President Obama.. Did you really think your cover up on slaughtered Americans would last this long?

  1. This post has been removed.

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from skeeter20. Show skeeter20's posts

    Re: President Obama.. Did you really think your cover up on slaughtered Americans would last this long?

    When are we going to hear from the survivors of Bengazi?  Why won't Obama let them speak?

     
  3. This post has been removed.

     
  4. This post has been removed.

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from StalkingButler. Show StalkingButler's posts

    Re: President Obama.. Did you really think your cover up on slaughtered Americans would last this long?

    When are we going to hear from the survivors of Bengazi?  Why won't Obama let them speak?

    That depends on whether or not Hillary becomes the next Democrat candidate for president. If she does don't plan on hearing from them until at least 2024.

     

     

     
  6. This post has been removed.

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from StalkingButler. Show StalkingButler's posts

    Re: President Obama.. Did you really think your cover up on slaughtered Americans would last this long?

    We shouldn't attack terrorists because that might make them mad? Back when Bush was President, isn't that exactly the strawman the RIGHT accused the LEFT of making, and then called the left a bunch of wusses?

     

    We're cool with attacking terrorists. We're not so cool about lying about it when there are the inevitable consequences. This is a common theme in this administration, say one thing and do somthing completely different.

    Go ahead and keep attacking terrorists but don't try to hide it and pretend that the Islamists are our friends.

    Oh, and when our people are attacked don't go for some beauty sleep so you'll look your best at the campaign rally the next day.

     

     
  8. This post has been removed.

     
  9. This post has been removed.

     
  10. This post has been removed.

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from StalkingButler. Show StalkingButler's posts

    Re: President Obama.. Did you really think your cover up on slaughtered Americans would last this long?

    Why haven't the wingnuts in the HoR subpoened any of the survivors?

     

    Why don't the Obamy drones at NBC/ABC/CBS/NYT/ETC go find them for an interview? You'd think that it falls under some important "Americans need to know" journalistic rule.


    And when I say CBS I'm excluding Sheryl Atkinson, she's great.

     

     
  12. This post has been removed.

     
  13. This post has been removed.

     
  14. This post has been removed.

     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from slomag. Show slomag's posts

    Re: President Obama.. Did you really think your cover up on slaughtered Americans would last this long?

    Why were we wasting our time with congressional hearings, when there was an e-book by a right-wing blogger and a chief petty officer in the works?

     

     
  16. This post has been removed.

     
  17. You have chosen to ignore posts from slomag. Show slomag's posts

    Re: President Obama.. Did you really think your cover up on slaughtered Americans would last this long?

    In response to Newtster's comment:

    In response to WhatDoYouWantNow's comment:

     

    In response to NO MO O's comment:

    Former CIA Director David Petraeus and other top intelligence officials were kept out of the loop on secret raids in Libya which may have triggered the attacks on the U.S. Consulate last year



     

    We shouldn't attack terrorists because that might make them mad?

    Back when Bush was President, isn't that exactly the strawman the RIGHT accused the LEFT of making, and then called the left a bunch of wusses?

    Now Fox is going to Blame Obama for Benghazi because we attacked terrorists? Because Brennan didn't coordinate with Petreaus?

    Clue: Even if that was a valid argument, it would be completely irrelevant because the terrorists don't care how the attacks against them are coordinated. They care about the attacks!

     

     

     

     

     

     

    LOL

     

     

     




    So next time you complain about Republicans causing the terrorists to get mad we will know you are a hypocrite too??

     

    Just trying out my crystal ball.

    Anyway, you have a point here, which is unusual. I hardly believe that these raids were some motivation to attack the embassy. What about all the other places that were attacked? Even if it were true that the attacks were carried out in response to these raids, so what?

    The questions I have for moonbats: Doesn't the rogue nature of this raid bother you? Did Congress authorize this use of force?  I thought that we were told no "boots on the ground" in Libya? Are you going to regret your approval of this action when a Republican adminstration pulls this crappp?? (I am assuming that the article has some resemblance to the truth in asking these questions. Of course it's possible the thing is made up or a lie)




    You're giving the authors too much credit.  The assassination of Osama bin Laden goes through the normal chain of command, but the operations in Libya are too sensitive?

    Ambassador Stevens was a revenge assassination target, but he was recovered by Libyan civilians and brought (without any resistance) to a nearby hospital where he died of smoke inhalation?

    These guys are just a couple of jack-asses trying to capitalize off right-wing paranoia.

     

     
  18. This post has been removed.

     
  19. This post has been removed.

     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share