Realizing that the economy isn't his strong point, Mittens shifts focus to education. You know, that part of the federal government over half his party wants to get rid of.

  1. This post has been removed.

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from UserName99. Show UserName99's posts

    Re: Realizing that the economy isn't his strong point, Mittens shifts focus to education. You know, that part of the federal ...

    In Response to Re: Realizing that the economy isn't his strong point, Mittens shifts focus to education. You know, that part of the federal government over half his party wants to get rid of.:
    In Response to Re: Realizing that the economy isn't his strong point, Mittens shifts focus to education. You know, that part of the federal government over half his party wants to get rid of. : I`ve been here since 2005 and I have NEVER seen a more ridiculous, stupid, and outright wrong post!!!  Seven years with the likes of Grim, Taco, Truth hurts, sheeple and it`s user (drug user) 99 that comes up with the all time dumbest post.  Yippeeee!!! Here`s the facts: January 20th 2009 (Obama`s 1st day)                 Today Gas      $1.83/gallon                                         $3.75/gallon DOW     14,000                                                12,000 and dropping Unemployment    5%                                         10% (CBO and NLRB) Avg net worth    $58,000                                   $36,000 Food stamps       29 million                                 54 million Debt                 $9.5 Trillion                              $15 Trillion Foreclosures       130,000/year                            1,500,000/year These are facts!  Show us ONE THING that has "improved".  ONE THING!!! And let`s not forget.........housing is in the toilet, food costs in the last 2 years  up as much as 35%, healthcare across the board is up 20% in the last 16 months, Iran is developing nukes, Russia is back and strong, N Vietnam is laughing in our face.  We lost almost 2 million jobs in the first 3 months of THIS FREAKIN year!  And your lying dope in chief is saying he`s "creating jobs"??? You are EXACTLY correct, "repeating lies over and over does not make them true".  You (and Obama) should practice what you preach. Thanks again for the BDC dumbest post ever.  Hope I`m around another 7 years to watch it reign as champ.
    Posted by jmel


    The Dow was 14000 and unemployment was at 5% on Obama's first day....you're sure about that?  Your credibility is on the line here.  Answer honestly.
     
  3. This post has been removed.

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from UserName99. Show UserName99's posts

    Re: Realizing that the economy isn't his strong point, Mittens shifts focus to education. You know, that part of the federal ...

    In Response to Re: Realizing that the economy isn't his strong point, Mittens shifts focus to education. You know, that part of the federal government over half his party wants to get rid of.:
    In Response to Re: Realizing that the economy isn't his strong point, Mittens shifts focus to education. You know, that part of the federal government over half his party wants to get rid of. : You`ve just posted the single dumbest post to ever hit BDC and you have the balls to question my credibility?   And...........you mention in your insane post, "manufacturing".  America has dropped from #1 to #5 in global competiveness druing this administration.  I`ll answer your DOW and unemployment question when you address the plethora of stupid lies you posted. 
    Posted by jmel


    I'll answer for you then, since these are facts.

    The Dow was under 8000 on Obama's 1st day.  Its now up 60%

    Unemployment was 7.8


     
  5. This post has been removed.

     
  6. This post has been removed.

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from macnh1. Show macnh1's posts

    Re: Realizing that the economy isn't his strong point, Mittens shifts focus to education. You know, that part of the federal ...

    That's President Mittens to you!!!
     
  8. This post has been removed.

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from skeeter20. Show skeeter20's posts

    Re: Realizing that the economy isn't his strong point, Mittens shifts focus to education. You know, that part of the federal ...

    In Response to Re: Realizing that the economy isn't his strong point, Mittens shifts focus to education. You know, that part of the federal government over half his party wants to get rid of.:
    In Response to Re: Realizing that the economy isn't his strong point, Mittens shifts focus to education. You know, that part of the federal government over half his party wants to get rid of. : If I weren't convinced you are a miserable excuse of a human being who vomits diahhrea for attention - whether it's a pat or a kick - I might actually be offended. After all, I am ethnically Jewish and often come down on the liberal side of issues.....        so calling me a nazi? Well...  mm Fortuantely, I don't think you are intelligent enough to mean your hate speech.   Then again.....      Maybe just a teenager hiding behind anonymity. That would explain things. Teenagers are generally d!cks in the most belligerently stupid way possible.
    Posted by WhatDoYouWantNow


    So, you post something about me and nazi's, and I am not allowed to respond?  Piece of work you are.

    Am I no allowed to clear up my slur by you against my point?


     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from doozy-day. Show doozy-day's posts

    Re: Realizing that the economy isn't his strong point, Mittens shifts focus to education. You know, that part of the federal ...

    In Response to Re: Realizing that the economy isn't his strong point, Mittens shifts focus to education. You know, that part of the federal government over half his party wants to get rid of.:
    In Response to Re: Realizing that the economy isn't his strong point, Mittens shifts focus to education. You know, that part of the federal government over half his party wants to get rid of. : Since the president took office, every aspect of the American economy — job creation, economic growth, manufacturing, the stock market, etc. — has improved considerably. Repeating lies over and over don't make them true.
    Posted by UserName99


    OMG, I just sprayed diet-Sprite all over my screen, you can't be serious!

    Please read what you just wrote while looking in the mirror, and tell me that you believe it?

    If that is the case, why are there so many Obama voters deserting the ship?

    Why are the polls so close?

    Why is Obama and team waging a war against romney that has no substance whatsoever?

    If what you say is true, then Obama would be riding a 70% wave, and Ron Paul would be the next GOP nominee!

    Jeebus what a dope!
     
  11. This post has been removed.

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from UserName99. Show UserName99's posts

    Re: Realizing that the economy isn't his strong point, Mittens shifts focus to education. You know, that part of the federal ...

    In Response to Re: Realizing that the economy isn't his strong point, Mittens shifts focus to education. You know, that part of the federal government over half his party wants to get rid of.:
    In Response to Re: Realizing that the economy isn't his strong point, Mittens shifts focus to education. You know, that part of the federal government over half his party wants to get rid of. : You`ve just posted the single dumbest post to ever hit BDC and you have the balls to question my credibility?   And...........you mention in your insane post, "manufacturing".  America has dropped from #1 to #5 in global competiveness druing this administration.  I`ll answer your DOW and unemployment question when you address the plethora of stupid lies you posted. 
    Posted by jmel


    Barack Obama: Increase of 157,368 manufacturing jobs per year in office
    George W. Bush: Decrease of 434,143 manufacturing jobs per year in office
    Bill Clinton: Increase of 37,143 manufacturing jobs per year in office
    George H.W. Bush: Decrease of 336,000 manufacturing jobs per year in office
    Ronald Reagan: Increase of 1,429 manufacturing jobs per year in office
    Jimmy Carter: Increase of 15,333 manufacturing jobs per year in office

    http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2011/dec/06/newt-gingrich/newt-gingrich-says-barack-obama-has-killed-jobs-en/
     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from UserName99. Show UserName99's posts

    Re: Realizing that the economy isn't his strong point, Mittens shifts focus to education. You know, that part of the federal ...

    In Response to Re: Realizing that the economy isn't his strong point, Mittens shifts focus to education. You know, that part of the federal government over half his party wants to get rid of.:
    In Response to Re: Realizing that the economy isn't his strong point, Mittens shifts focus to education. You know, that part of the federal government over half his party wants to get rid of. : Told ya that post was a "keeper".  It will have a very long run at the top of the dumb-list at BDC.  Going to be hard to beat.
    Posted by jmel


    Does this look to you like a president who “lost jobs”, or like a president who inherited an economy in free fall? You can accuse Obama of not doing enough to promote recovery, but to claim that Obama caused the job loss is indefensible.

    This thread is further evidence that conservatives become furious and indignant when presented with facts and history.  That usually leads them to resort to lying...saying things like Bush left a 14000 Dow and unemployment at 5.....followed by a flurry of exclamation points (and probably spittle on the liars keyboard).  Of course you can always backpeddal and lie again when called on it.

     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from skeeter20. Show skeeter20's posts

    Re: Realizing that the economy isn't his strong point, Mittens shifts focus to education. You know, that part of the federal ...

    In Response to Re: Realizing that the economy isn't his strong point, Mittens shifts focus to education. You know, that part of the federal government over half his party wants to get rid of.:
    In Response to Re: Realizing that the economy isn't his strong point, Mittens shifts focus to education. You know, that part of the federal government over half his party wants to get rid of. : By doing what? Claiming that when you called liberals nazis, you weren't actually calling liberals nazis? Instead you were giving us a critique of the theory of special relativity? Whatever. Scum deserves little to no attention.
    Posted by WhatDoYouWantNow


    Nazi's were progressives/liberal, whatever.  I posted the evidence.  that you sling it at me like it is some bizarre concept is in essence a slur.

    If you understood half of what you claim, you would see that controlling the people, the core tenet of national socialism, is also the core tenet of liberalism.  In liberalism, the government has always got to issue a regulation, make a law, restrict someone's freedom.  That you ascribe "they mean well" values to current liberals makes it no less fascism.  don't you think people in germany thought they "meant well"?

    I see a similarity there, don't you?
     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from skeeter20. Show skeeter20's posts

    Re: Realizing that the economy isn't his strong point, Mittens shifts focus to education. You know, that part of the federal ...

    In Response to Re: Realizing that the economy isn't his strong point, Mittens shifts focus to education. You know, that part of the federal government over half his party wants to get rid of.:
    In Response to Re: Realizing that the economy isn't his strong point, Mittens shifts focus to education. You know, that part of the federal government over half his party wants to get rid of. : Does this look to you like a president who “lost jobs”, or like a president who inherited an economy in free fall? You can accuse Obama of not doing enough to promote recovery, but to claim that Obama caused the job loss is indefensible.
    Posted by UserName99


    Seeing where the axis crosses, it quite clearly show that Obama is in a deficit position when it come to jobs.
     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from skeeter20. Show skeeter20's posts

    Re: Realizing that the economy isn't his strong point, Mittens shifts focus to education. You know, that part of the federal ...

    In Response to Re: Realizing that the economy isn't his strong point, Mittens shifts focus to education. You know, that part of the federal government over half his party wants to get rid of.:
    In Response to Re: Realizing that the economy isn't his strong point, Mittens shifts focus to education. You know, that part of the federal government over half his party wants to get rid of. : Does this look to you like a president who “lost jobs”, or like a president who inherited an economy in free fall? You can accuse Obama of not doing enough to promote recovery, but to claim that Obama caused the job loss is indefensible.
    Posted by UserName99


    Oh, I found it in the NYT.  This is a Krugman chart.  I extent and revise my remarks:  It's total BS.  Krugman couldn't count to ten using both hands. He is a total socialist and an Obama apologist.   I am sure there is some twist to this chart that is not apparent.
     
  17. This post has been removed.

     
  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from UserName99. Show UserName99's posts

    Re: Realizing that the economy isn't his strong point, Mittens shifts focus to education. You know, that part of the federal ...

    In Response to Re: Realizing that the economy isn't his strong point, Mittens shifts focus to education. You know, that part of the federal government over half his party wants to get rid of.:
    In Response to Re: Realizing that the economy isn't his strong point, Mittens shifts focus to education. You know, that part of the federal government over half his party wants to get rid of. : Oh, I found it in the NYT.  This is a Krugman chart.  I extent and revise my remarks:  It's total BS.  Krugman couldn't count to ten using both hands. He is a total socialist and an Obama apologist.   I am sure there is some twist to this chart that is not apparent.
    Posted by skeeter20


    A 'Krugman chart'?  Actually its a Bureau of Labor Statistics chart and pretty much lines up identically with ADT charts that track employment trends.  Are you saying there is a Krugman, BLS, and ADT conspiracy to put out BS info?
     
  19. This post has been removed.

     
  20. This post has been removed.

     
  21. This post has been removed.

     
  22. This post has been removed.

     
  23. You have chosen to ignore posts from skeeter20. Show skeeter20's posts

    Re: Realizing that the economy isn't his strong point, Mittens shifts focus to education. You know, that part of the federal ...

    In Response to Re: Realizing that the economy isn't his strong point, Mittens shifts focus to education. You know, that part of the federal government over half his party wants to get rid of.:
    In Response to Re: Realizing that the economy isn't his strong point, Mittens shifts focus to education. You know, that part of the federal government over half his party wants to get rid of. : A 'Krugman chart'?  Actually its a Bureau of Labor Statistics chart and pretty much lines up identically with ADT charts that track employment trends.  Are you saying there is a Krugman, BLS, and ADT conspiracy to put out BS info?
    Posted by UserName99


    Here's why it is BS.  The chart redrawn to include all of Bush and all of Obama:

    FRED Graph
     
  24. You have chosen to ignore posts from skeeter20. Show skeeter20's posts

    Re: Realizing that the economy isn't his strong point, Mittens shifts focus to education. You know, that part of the federal ...

    In Response to Re: Realizing that the economy isn't his strong point, Mittens shifts focus to education. You know, that part of the federal government over half his party wants to get rid of.:
    In Response to Re: Realizing that the economy isn't his strong point, Mittens shifts focus to education. You know, that part of the federal government over half his party wants to get rid of. : We`ve been through this before airborne.  We`ve all got it.  A president is responsible for NOTHING during his term if it`s BAD and said president is a DEMOCRAT.  If it`s GOOD, and the president is a REPUBLICAN, it was NOT because of policy, it`s due to the PREVIOUS DEMOCRAT president.  If a DEMOCRAT president has a successful term (or 2), it`s because he is a genius and despite the "whacko-wingnuts" he managed to perform and be great. All the incompetence, destruction, and complete failure, of the Obama administration is BUSH`S FAULT.  Again, we`ve got it. Pssssst..........How`s that AAA credit rating working out?
    Posted by jmel


    Your post is too complicated for airhead.  Let me simplyfy it a bit:

    Democrats = GOOD

    Republicans = BAD

    and, it's Bush's fault.

    HALLIBURTON CHENEY!  WAR FOR OIL!

    The above is the complete sum of the progressive contribution to these forums from the beginning of time.
     
  25. This post has been removed.

     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share