In Response to Re: Scott Brown in lockstep with Repubs yet again...:



YOU decided it was emblematic.  I said the last amendment took 200 years, and not even to you.

It did.  You're the idiot AGAIN, and I can actually spell, "amendment".  This is great fun.  Keep it rolling.  Even my kids are laughing at you.

C'mon Ubu, SPEAK!

Greg. The back and forth between you and airborne is paradigmatic. This happens regularly between you and others.

Perhaps you had a nugget of knowledge he did not have memorized: That an amendment passed in 1992 was first proposed 205 years ago.

Con-grat-u-la-ma-f**king-lations. You can have a gold star. There you go. Here's my drawing of your star:


*



Well anyway, what what's the result of bringing it up, having a back and forth?

The result: You're jumping up and down congratulating yourself on how you proved him wrong about something.

The problem: Even if you zinged him, it had absolutely nothing to do with the f**king issues: (1) Whether or not Brown supports or opposes the Republican platform, and (2) people considering his position on abortion in whether to vote for him.

Who f**king cares how hard it takes to get an amendment passed?  Seriously? Who? Other than you? It isn't the point at all. The entire point is that the GOP's position isn't merely to get an amendment passed. It's that they do everything else as well: Trying to put up justices who might overturn it. Pushing laws that clamp down on it. Fighting funding for anything that might help people get abortions. Etc.

Brown's statements about the GOP platform on abortion are directly relevant to those concerns.

So, your zing on airborne is just so damn irrelevant that it hurts to watch you congratulate yourself about it.

In Response to Re: Scott Brown in lockstep with Repubs yet again...:


Allright. Whatever. Go on and jump up and down. I'm sure someone will give you a banana.





(Of course none of this would be an issue if that gaggle of @sshats would just stop bringing abortion up. But other Republicans have to tell them that.)

This post has been removed.

This post has been removed.

In Response to Re: Scott Brown in lockstep with Repubs yet again...:


"as by the date it was introduced in Congress"  Yea, thats what counts.

Who said it took 200 years, and who said I should look that up again?

HILARIOUS!!!

Wow.  26 is after 27, and 1971 is after 1992.

You are such a good doggy.

Speak Ubu!

This is just TOO much fun.  My kids are inviting their friends over.  You're a frigg1n HIT man!  Glorious!!!

In Response to Re: Scott Brown in lockstep with Repubs yet again...:


What about the thousands of black anglo-saxons that follow you around? I'm sure they could help you laugh at airborne.

About something Completely. F**king. Irrelevant.

This post has been removed.

Go easy on Greg.  He goes through these often absurd gyrations to avoid the unfortuante fact that he has tied himself to a party that has a social agenda that he does not accept.  Rather than confront that fact he gyrates away with these scatological tangents.  He will be talking about Byrd and the KKK and Clinton and DADT in another minute.  More gyrations of avoidance.  He can't help it, it is a compulsion to avoid an unfortunate reality.

Greg. The back and forth between you and airborne is paradigmatic. This happens regularly between you and others.

Perhaps you had a nugget of knowledge he did not have memorized: That an amendment passed in 1992 was first proposed 205 years ago.

Con-grat-u-la-ma-f**king-lations. You can have a gold star. There you go. Here's my drawing of your star

---------------------------------------
Even you knew it was a joke.  Perhaps it being followed by "relax" was the first hint.  I mean, I suppose one could surmise I actually think all 17 amendments (NB, spelling), take 200 years, which would make our country 3400 years old, or ancient Egypt and the Pyramids.  Now THOSE dudes were some fcking Free Masons!

Obelisk, schmobelisk - here's your Great Seal! Orf orf (hold the Carmina Burana jokes)

And yes, I continue to work with more than one black anglo-saxon, but I'm sure you know more about them than they do.

See?  I got YOUR joke!

I hope...

BTW, I didn't know 12 was Airborne too.  Cheers mate.

In Response to Re: Scott Brown in lockstep with Repubs yet again...:


Good Ubu.

Now Sit

Brown knows that if he supports that bill it would be political suicide for him in MA. Simple as that. Listen, I like Brown as a person. As a person, I like him a lot better than Elizabeth Warren.  I voted for him in the last election. I supported him even when I didn't agree with his votes because for the most part, he seemed to be genuinely voting for what he thought was best for the people he represented. All of that changed for me when he voted "yes" on the Blunt amendment. Sorry, but as a woman and a human being, I don't want my access to affordable healthcare and my insurance coverage based on the whim of a religious organization..especially when we have separation of Church and State in this country.

This post has been removed.

In Response to Re: Scott Brown in lockstep with Repubs yet again...:

This post has been removed.