So, will Coakley really investigate Cahill?

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from whatnow3. Show whatnow3's posts

    So, will Coakley really investigate Cahill?

    It seems that this has fallen off the radar.  Let alone he was a benficiary of the newest scandal.  You know the one that Deleo promises he will investigate.  But of course he too benefitted.  This state is a joke!!! 

    Email her, and let her know you expect her to do her job. 

    ago@state.ma.us
     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from skeeter20. Show skeeter20's posts

    Re: So, will Coakley really investigate Cahill?

    In Response to So, will Coakley really investigate Cahill?:
    It seems that this has fallen off the radar.  Let alone he was a benficiary of the newest scandal.  You know the one that Deleo promises he will investigate.  But of course he too benefitted.  This state is a joke!!!  Email her, and let her know you expect her to do her job.  ago@state.ma.us
    Posted by whatnow3


    Technically, in Massachusetts, it is not illegal to be an illegal shill for Deval.

    Do you really expect Marsha Choakley to investigate anything?
     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from ProfessorPain. Show ProfessorPain's posts

    Re: So, will Coakley really investigate Cahill?

    I don't think anyone really cares about this issue to be honest. Baker lost. He would of lost whether Cahill ran or not. The republicans need to stop making excuses for why they lost in mass.
     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from ForumCleaner. Show ForumCleaner's posts

    Re: So, will Coakley really investigate Cahill?

    No one cares. The republicans lost. Cahill's campaign didn't impact the outcome. Get over it.
     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from whatnow3. Show whatnow3's posts

    Re: So, will Coakley really investigate Cahill?

    Forum, did you get kicked in the head by a horse?  Nobody cares that Cahill used lottery funds to run campaign ads?

    You don't care?  What the heck is wrong with you. 

    And your disgusting display the other day with Hawkeye makes me believe you are sick in the head.  Grow up!

    You actually met someone in park so you could fight. . . . . .I use to like you.  You have become an embarassment. 
     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from RevWright. Show RevWright's posts

    Re: So, will Coakley really investigate Cahill?

    In Response to Re: So, will Coakley really investigate Cahill?:
    No one cares. The republicans lost. Cahill's campaign didn't impact the outcome. Get over it.
    Posted by ForumCleaner


    You're smarter than that.
     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from ForumCleaner. Show ForumCleaner's posts

    Re: So, will Coakley really investigate Cahill?

    In Response to Re: So, will Coakley really investigate Cahill?:
    In Response to Re: So, will Coakley really investigate Cahill? : You're smarter than that.
    Posted by RevWright


    It didn't. And everyone knows it. Cahill probably took more votes from patrick than he took from baker. Just accept that you lost the race.
     
  8. This post has been removed.

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from hawkeye01. Show hawkeye01's posts

    Re: So, will Coakley really investigate Cahill?

    Is RevWright really Baker?
     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from ForumCleaner. Show ForumCleaner's posts

    Re: So, will Coakley really investigate Cahill?

    In Response to Re: So, will Coakley really investigate Cahill?:
    Forum, did you get kicked in the head by a horse?  Nobody cares that Cahill used lottery funds to run campaign ads? You don't care?  What the heck is wrong with you.  And your disgusting display the other day with Hawkeye makes me believe you are sick in the head.  Grow up! You actually met someone in park so you could fight. . . . . .I use to like you.  You have become an embarassment. 
    Posted by whatnow3


    I care that he may have done it, but I'm not going to lose sleep over it. The guy lost. He isn't in a position of power. He gained nothing. If they have the resources, by all means investigate. But I'd honeslty rather the attorney general investigate more serious and pressing concerns than waste its time pandering tot he public by going after cahill. It has more symbolic value than real value.

    I'm sorry you were dissappointed by my performance but hawkeye deserved a beating anyways, and it was the only way I could prove to him I wasn't lying. He is a coward and didn't show though, so I guess it doesn't matter in the end.
     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from RevWright. Show RevWright's posts

    Re: So, will Coakley really investigate Cahill?

    In Response to Re: So, will Coakley really investigate Cahill?:
    In Response to Re: So, will Coakley really investigate Cahill? : It didn't. And everyone knows it. Cahill probably took more votes from patrick than he took from baker. Just accept that you lost the race.
    Posted by ForumCleaner


    I'm not in denial. It's really moot.

    I hope that nobody is holding their breath waiting for Martha to do anything.
     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from hawkeye01. Show hawkeye01's posts

    Re: So, will Coakley really investigate Cahill?

    I'm sorry you were dissappointed by my performance but hawkeye deserved a beating anyways, and it was the only way I could prove to him I wasn't lying. He is a coward and didn't show though, so I guess it doesn't matter in the end.


    Dahn da naaaaa....Captain Internet-Tough-Guy strikes again.
    He is to be admired for his courage in challenging posters on message boards to fights. Only a true brave and courageous mature adult would behave this way. Men want to be him...women want to be with him. He is what we all strive to be. Hail all to Captain Internet-Tough-Guy!

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from DirtyWaterLover. Show DirtyWaterLover's posts

    Re: So, will Coakley really investigate Cahill?

    Isn't political corruption something the FBI usually handles?  I for one would prefer the FEDs deal with this. 

     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from DirtyWaterLover. Show DirtyWaterLover's posts

    Re: So, will Coakley really investigate Cahill?

    In Response to Re: So, will Coakley really investigate Cahill?:
    In Response to Re: So, will Coakley really investigate Cahill? : Well, she sued the fed over DOMA and won.  Of course, Obambi is challenging that too. Ah, the tolerant left and their support for gay rights.
    Posted by GreginMeffa


    Support for Gay rights?????  Oh, you mean the full application of the Constitution to all citizens.  I didn't realize you considered Gays to be less than full citizens of the country. 
     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from DirtyWaterLover. Show DirtyWaterLover's posts

    Re: So, will Coakley really investigate Cahill?

    "Obama is fighting in the courts on two fronts. "

    I believe the Justice Department is doing what they are supposed to be doing - defending the Law. 
     
  16. This post has been removed.

     
  17. You have chosen to ignore posts from massmoderateJoe. Show massmoderateJoe's posts

    Re: So, will Coakley really investigate Cahill?

    In Response to Re: So, will Coakley really investigate Cahill?:
    Back to Cahill  Shouldn't AG investigate whether State funds were use to Advertise under cover lottery for him.  For the life of me, I can not see why he stayed in the race, unless he thought somehow it would help him in the further down the line.
    Posted by howiewho

    He's a politician, hence ego, hence like all of them he doesn't get it.

     
  18. This post has been removed.

     
  19. You have chosen to ignore posts from DirtyWaterLover. Show DirtyWaterLover's posts

    Re: So, will Coakley really investigate Cahill?

    In Response to Re: So, will Coakley really investigate Cahill?:
    In Response to Re: So, will Coakley really investigate Cahill? : Defend a law he promised to repeal.  Maybe he was lying. I'll give ya DOMA.  He's said he's against gay marriage from the gitgo.
    Posted by GreginMeffa


    What's wrong with defending a law he wants repealed?  Until the law is repealed, it's still the law of the land.  Just because Bush only enforced laws that he agreed with doesn't mean that's the norm.
     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from hawkeye01. Show hawkeye01's posts

    Re: So, will Coakley really investigate Cahill?

    What's wrong with defending a law he wants repealed?


    So it IS possible to defend something you don't agree with...hmmmm
     
  21. You have chosen to ignore posts from NowWhatDoYouWant. Show NowWhatDoYouWant's posts

    Re: So, will Coakley really investigate Cahill?

     

     

    In response to FortySixAndTwo's comment:

    In response to Xacto's comment:

    In response to FortySixAndTwo's comment:

    In response to NowWhatDoYouWant's comment:

    In response to FortySixAndTwo's comment:


    You're the one who has to live with being the liar. You know you said it. Why would you deny such a thing?

    Not my fault you make accusations you can't back up.

    I'm terribly sorry they picked on you for your size in grade school, but this is completely pathetic. Post a link, or admit you were wrong for once in your life.

    Hahaha...If you think I have the time to go through thousands of posts to try to find your statement you're dumber than I thought. Don't be mad at me because I called you out for being a fraud.

     


    Fraud: A false representation of a matter of fact—whether by words or by conduct, by false or misleading allegations, or by concealment...

    Find the link why don't ya?

    Because we all know it's impossible. There isn't a search engine on BDC to look up only his posts. He knows that which is why he keeps asking. He knows it can't be done without spendings hours and hours of looking. Not to mention he's had screen names banned. So even if I were to spend hours and hours looking it might not be there because I can't search for anything under his old name(s)

     

     

    Really?

    There isn't a search engine? So for example if I wanted to show that it was someone else who threatened you with physical violence, I wouldn't be able to do it?

    And even if there was a search engine, I couldn't use it because as you say, the screen names were "banned"?

    (And if I did, you'd make brave little remarks about "too much time" or "databases"?)

     

     

     

    In response to ForumCleaner's comment:

    In Response to Re: So, will Coakley really investigate Cahill?:

     

    Forum, did you get kicked in the head by a horse? Nobody cares that Cahill used lottery funds to run campaign ads? You don't care? What the heck is wrong with you. And your disgusting display the other day with Hawkeye makes me believe you are sick in the head. Grow up! You actually met someone in park so you could fight. . . . . .I use to like you. You have become an embarassment.
    Posted by whatnow3

     

    I care that he may have done it, but I'm not going to lose sleep over it. The guy lost. He isn't in a position of power. He gained nothing. If they have the resources, by all means investigate. But I'd honeslty rather the attorney general investigate more serious and pressing concerns than waste its time pandering tot he public by going after cahill. It has more symbolic value than real value.

    I'm sorry you were dissappointed by my performance but hawkeye deserved a beating anyways, and it was the only way I could prove to him I wasn't lying. He is a coward and didn't show though, so I guess it doesn't matter in the end.

     

    Ohhh.....

    So it was some guy "forumcleaner" and not me who challenged you to fight as a result of words on BDC?

    So I could just punch a few words into google along with "www.boston.com/community" as a search term and find old posts? Under these supposedly banned accounts?

    Guess you were lying again, 46.

     

    In response to hawkeye01's comment:

    In response to ForumCleaner's comment:

    I'm sorry you were dissappointed by my performance but hawkeye deserved a beating anyways, and it was the only way I could prove to him I wasn't lying. He is a coward and didn't show though, so I guess it doesn't matter in the end.He is a coward and didn't show though, so I guess it doesn't matter in the end. 


    Dahn da naaaaa....Captain Internet-Tough-Guy strikes again.
    He is to be admired for his courage in challenging posters on message boards to fights. Only a true brave and courageous mature adult would behave this way. Men want to be him...women want to be with him. He is what we all strive to be.

    Hail all to Captain Internet-Tough-Guy!

     

    . . . and instead of showing up, you decided to run to BDC to run your mouth at him some more?

     

     

    Instead of saying that fighting is immature, you pull a no-show, THEN call HIM the internet tough guy?

    What's that you like to say in these situations?

    BWWAAAAAA!

     

     
  22. You have chosen to ignore posts from high-road. Show high-road's posts

    Re: So, will Coakley really investigate Cahill?

    Interesting ....

     
  23. You have chosen to ignore posts from NowWhatDoYouWant. Show NowWhatDoYouWant's posts

    Re: So, will Coakley really investigate Cahill?

    In response to high-road's comment:

    Interesting ....




    Yes it is, isn't it?

    No doubt this is "trying too hard," "databases," or "creepy", and a pack of lies defends his last pack of lies.

    Anything to paper over who the real internet tough guy is.

     
  24. This post has been removed.

     
  25. You have chosen to ignore posts from NowWhatDoYouWant. Show NowWhatDoYouWant's posts

    Re: So, will Coakley really investigate Cahill?

    Spin spin spin, little man. You got caught lying.

     

     

    (And it still cracks me up that you think it makes you tough that we called each other hypocrites in a Starbucks.)

     
Sections
Shortcuts