Re: Swine on Parade
posted at 10/9/2013 7:40 AM EDT
In response to A_Concerned_Citizen's comment:
In response to Hansoribrother's comment:
You lack an objective point of view on this. How shocking!
Where can you find someone on the Repbulican side demanding "unconditional surrender"? They state some public position and want to talk. Obama says "I will not negotiate". Really, are you that partisan that you can't see who is demanding "unconditional surrender".? I guess so.
Is a one year delay on Obamacare for individuals "unconditional surrender" when Obama himself has delayed it for corporations and doled out 1000's of exemptions?
You forget that the President's power to veto is no stronger in power than the Republican's power in Congress to deny him what he wants. Why is the power of Congress to be ignored?
You seem to believe that there are only two positions - either Congress caves or the President does. There isn't anything in between?
Oh, I forgot.
"I will not negotiate"
- Barack Hussein Obama
According to you the party willing to negotiate is shutting down government while the party who refuses to negotiate has no responsibility.
Of for gawds sake... seriously?
You're spouting partisan bullcrappe while accusing others of doing it.
You really aren't the sharpest tool in the shed are ya spanky? Does 'projection' mean anything to a dunce like you?
Hey how about this:
Follow the dang Constitution!
The whackjobs have had their vote, passed their proposal and sent it to the Senate.
The Senate, as a co-equal chamber has the power, vested by the Article 1 of the CONSTITUTION, to "concur or propose amendments" to the wingnuts bill.
Ya got that so far spanky?
The Senate has, 3 times, allowed an open and honest vote on every House CR.
They have sent back that same CR bill with their Constitutionally granted power of amending that bill.
So why hasn't the wingnuts allowed a vote that on the CR that has already passed these Constitutional hurdles?
Why won't you freakin cowards allow a vote on the same bill that the Senate allowed a vote on?
What are you so afraid of?
Rhetorical question: You are afraid that you idiots don't have the power to stop commonsense.
So just shut the fcvk up about "objectivity". You're sitting here encouraging one party to break the Constitutional process of appropriations just so you can keep your lips locked onto a very dirty part of your lemmings-with-suicide-vests anatomy.
Here's an objective statement, a few of them:
Only Obama can default on the national debt.
Only Democrats are calling their political opponents terrorists.
Either the free market or single payer is preferable to Obamacare.
Liberals, knowing that most people are lazy and dependent at some level, see this breaking their way to single payer, as Obamacare craters. I think they are right.