Timeline anyone.. It appears this administration is incompetent .. or LYING.

  1. This post has been removed.

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from DirtyWaterLover. Show DirtyWaterLover's posts

    Re: Timeline anyone.. It appears this administration is incompetent .. or LYING.

    What's the difference between a terrorist attack and an attack by insurgents/extremists?

    Were the Viet Cong terrorists or insurgents?  Were the Contra terrorists or extremists?

    Does it matter if the attack was by extremists, terrorists, or insurgents?

    Where's the proof that the attack was planned before the video went viral?

    Do terrorists normally use mortars when they attack?  Attacks involing mortars doesn't sound like the normal MO of terrorists.  Don't most terrorist attacks involve a car bomb or some guy wearing a suicide vest?

    If I were an intelligence analyst, I'm calling them insurgents just because they were using mortars.

     

     
  3. This post has been removed.

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from StalkingButler. Show StalkingButler's posts

    Re: Timeline anyone.. It appears this administration is incompetent .. or LYING.

    What's the difference between a terrorist attack and an attack by insurgents/extremists?


    It all depends on what the meaning if attack is.


    Seriously, parsing the words doesn't, in the end, show that the administration wasn't lying. They were. And while I do think that there is a boatload of incompetence in this administration it's pretty clear that they knew exactly what was going on during the first few hours of it happening and they chose to spin it differently for political reasons.


    As Hillary said "We're going to put that film-maker in prison."

     

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from slomag. Show slomag's posts

    Re: Timeline anyone.. It appears this administration is incompetent .. or LYING.

    In response to StalkingButler's comment:

     

    What's the difference between a terrorist attack and an attack by insurgents/extremists?

     


    It all depends on what the meaning if attack is.


    Seriously, parsing the words doesn't, in the end, show that the administration wasn't lying. They were. And while I do think that there is a boatload of incompetence in this administration it's pretty clear that they knew exactly what was going on during the first few hours of it happening and they chose to spin it differently for political reasons.


    As Hillary said "We're going to put that film-maker in prison."

     




    It's not parsing words - if the consulate was attacked by Al Qaeda, then the fox news narrative was correct - it was a pre-planned attack on the anniversary of 9/11.

    If the attack was from Ansar al Shari, a group of Libyan militants that did not exist when bin Laden was killed - let alone the original 9/11, then the fox news narrative is sh1t.

     

     
  6. This post has been removed.

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from StalkingButler. Show StalkingButler's posts

    Re: Timeline anyone.. It appears this administration is incompetent .. or LYING.

    t's not parsing words - if the consulate was attacked by Al Qaeda, then the fox news narrative was correct - it was a pre-planned attack on the anniversary of 9/11. If the attack was from Ansar al Shari, a group of Libyan militants that did not exist when bin Laden was killed - let alone the original 9/11, then the fox news narrative is sh1t.

     

    This is what a colleague of mine calls "throwing up chaff."


    It doesn't really matter WHO the terrorists (or militants, whatever) call themselves or who is reporting it. The fact is that a pre-planned assault by Islamists probably connected to al Qaeda took the lives of four Americans including our ambassador.


    That is what happened. The only real questions now are who made the decision to tell our assets in the area to stand down and who made the decision to make it official administration policy to lie about these events.

     

     

     

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from MattyScornD. Show MattyScornD's posts

    Re: Timeline anyone.. It appears this administration is incompetent .. or LYING.

    Much ado about nothing.

    Crankshaft McCain and his pals are chasing their tails, as usual, over a non-controversy...just about the worst they can drum up against the surprisingly scandal-free admin.

    Aren't there some minorities or women or foreign countries they should be denigrading right about now...?

     

     
  9. This post has been removed.

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from BilltheKat. Show BilltheKat's posts

    Re: Timeline anyone.. It appears this administration is incompetent .. or LYING.

    You guys lonely? Yelling out into the wilderness?

     

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from Reubenhop. Show Reubenhop's posts

    Re: Timeline anyone.. It appears this administration is incompetent .. or LYING.

    In response to msobstinate99's comment:

    There is no doubt there has been lie after lie told. The bottom line, the commander in chief has blood on his hands. Will he be held responsible? 




    Actually there is considerable doubt.  Care to prove your points?  But you can't.  You arrived at your conclusion first, facts to prove it are completely secondary.

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from StalkingButler. Show StalkingButler's posts

    Re: Timeline anyone.. It appears this administration is incompetent .. or LYING.

    Much ado about nothing.

    Unless you care about minor issues as the security of our foreign service members worldwide, our standing in the world with our putative allies, and an administration that's proving time and time again that it is untrustworthy and incompetent.


    But then again you probably do care much more about the big issues like free contraception for college women and the proper way to transport dogs. So, in that case, carry on.

     

     

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from skeeter20. Show skeeter20's posts

    Re: Timeline anyone.. It appears this administration is incompetent .. or LYING.

    In response to slomag's comment:

    In response to StalkingButler's comment:

     

    What's the difference between a terrorist attack and an attack by insurgents/extremists?

     


    It all depends on what the meaning if attack is.


    Seriously, parsing the words doesn't, in the end, show that the administration wasn't lying. They were. And while I do think that there is a boatload of incompetence in this administration it's pretty clear that they knew exactly what was going on during the first few hours of it happening and they chose to spin it differently for political reasons.


    As Hillary said "We're going to put that film-maker in prison."

     




    It's not parsing words - if the consulate was attacked by Al Qaeda, then the fox news narrative was correct - it was a pre-planned attack on the anniversary of 9/11.

    If the attack was from Ansar al Shari, a group of Libyan militants that did not exist when bin Laden was killed - let alone the original 9/11, then the fox news narrative is sh1t.

     



    Which group was ticked off by the video?

    Look, it is simple.  Who in the Obama administration decided is was about the video?

     
  14. This post has been removed.

     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from slomag. Show slomag's posts

    Re: Timeline anyone.. It appears this administration is incompetent .. or LYING.

    In response to skeeter20's comment:

    In response to slomag's comment:

    In response to StalkingButler's comment:

     

    What's the difference between a terrorist attack and an attack by insurgents/extremists?

     


    It all depends on what the meaning if attack is.


    Seriously, parsing the words doesn't, in the end, show that the administration wasn't lying. They were. And while I do think that there is a boatload of incompetence in this administration it's pretty clear that they knew exactly what was going on during the first few hours of it happening and they chose to spin it differently for political reasons.


    As Hillary said "We're going to put that film-maker in prison."

     




    It's not parsing words - if the consulate was attacked by Al Qaeda, then the fox news narrative was correct - it was a pre-planned attack on the anniversary of 9/11.

    If the attack was from Ansar al Shari, a group of Libyan militants that did not exist when bin Laden was killed - let alone the original 9/11, then the fox news narrative is sh1t.

     



    Which group was ticked off by the video?

    Look, it is simple.  Who in the Obama administration decided is was about the video?




    Ansar al Sharia was ticked off by the video, according to Reuters ...

    U.S. officials have said they believe militants used the protests as cover to carry out an armed assault on the U.S. diplomatic compound and a building that was supposed to be a safe house.

    "The film which insulted the Prophet was a direct attack on our values and if America wants good relations with the Muslim world it needs to do so with respect," Abu Khattala said. "If they want to do it with force, they will be met with force."

     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share