Re: Vindicated... told ya so - Climate Change aka Global Warming
posted at 11/24/2010 11:38 PM EST
In Response to Re: Vindicated... told ya so - Climate Change aka Global Warming
[QUOTE]In Response to Re: Vindicated... told ya so - Climate Change aka Global Warming : Oh, a Republican went along with the charade. I think I'll change my mind now! Curious that ALL Democrat and Republican Senators voted against the Kyoto Protocol when Democrat Clinton was President. And even when Democrats control a majority of House and Senate today - cap and trade is toast. I see you speak the language of junk science practiced by the global warmers: "cap and trade to deal with some of the environmental issues at at hand" Limiting CO2 emissions has NOTHING TO DO WITH THE ENVIRONMENT! You either never took a chemistry course in your life or you are more of a liar than Bernie Madoff. OK, I'll slack off and say that in your ignorance and meaning to do well, you have fallen for the scientific charade pulled off by the global warming zealots. They show you a picture of a smoke stack or a traffic jam in smog and appeal to your sense of wanting to have some clean air to breathe. CO2 is not pollution. Smog is caused by unburned hydrocarbons and ozone - has nothing to do with CO2. Pollution is stuff like PCB's, pesticides, nitrous oxides, sulfur dioxide, etc. Limiting CO2 will do nothing to limit pollution, nevermind whether or not it does anything to mitigate climate change. I'm a chemist by education (and a decade of experience before I decided that potential exposure to stuff like dioxin as a chemist was not worth it). The lies told by the global warming scaremongers about environmental chemistry are outrageous.
Posted by Newtster[/QUOTE]
Wow, big bad "scientist" gets a chance to unload on someone who has already posted that he was not up on all the science ....im shaking as you show us that you are a legend in your own twisted mind......science guy lite..
From my limited reading and what i have gleaned is that you are on one side, the minority side on the shrinking debate on man made emissions. However you post some things I can't say are right, wrong, political, or up for debate. I do have a resource who works with trying to sequester CO2 (oh for some reason since its not an issue but the compamy she works for seems to spend a good amount of resources tring o work this process.... I can ask about this so I will inquire to see the reasons about CO2 then hit them with Newster's take.
I'm sure the CEO will say, why didn't anyone tell me Newster said CO2 isn't a problem.Why I will shut our operation down and apologize profusely to Newster for our insolence and ignorance and hubris. We will tear up our years of work and fire our experts on this area of science....and go with da Newster's ideas.
Well, at least thats a possible Newster twisted sci-fantasy.........ya gots ta wonder about these RW'ers LOL