Watergate II?

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from tvoter. Show tvoter's posts

    Re: Watergate II?

    In response to WhatDoYouWantNow's comment:

    Are you asserting that you have searched every "alphabet network" and see zero mention of an investigation into possible bugging and/or how the tape was leaked?

    Or are you simply claiming none of them have any such reporting and betting that nobody here is going to be inspired to search them for you and prove you wrong? (Nevermind that if they did you'd just start another thread with the same false claim, as with Benghazi).


    I am saying that the alphabets networks ar the MSM along with CNN Foxnews etc to a lessor extent.

    I only watch TV news in the morning and it's local news on the alphabets but, they give a "Here's what's coming" talking about Good Morning America; George Steponamopulas stated "in breaking news people are outraged over a "released" recording of senator Repubican leader Mitch McConnell and staffers planning attack the actress Ashley judd"

    That is just partisan reporting from Clintons right hand man!

  2. This post has been removed.

  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from skeeter20. Show skeeter20's posts

    Re: Watergate II?

    In response to A_Concerned_Citizen's comment:

    Wasn't the entire brouhaha over Acorn a result of the surreptitious recording of meetings without consent?


    Never mind the selective editing and the fact that O'Keefe lost a lawsuit for violating privacy laws.

    Did you defend Acorn as being unfairly targeted in the media?

    Possibly a fair point, but remember that at least one party in the ACORN recordings had consented.  In this case, no parties involved inthe conversation consented.

  4. This post has been removed.

  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from tvoter. Show tvoter's posts

    Re: Watergate II?

    UH OH


    The head of a group accused of illegally taping private meetings of Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell's campaign visited the White House days before the group's Twitter account began actively attacking the Kentucky Republican, according to White House visitors logs.

    White House logs and the Twitter feed of Shawn Reilly, one of two men at the heart of the McConnell wiretapping scandal, show he met with White House officials on Dec. 5, just days before his organization Progress Kentucky began a messaging blitzkrieg against the Republican leader.

    Reilly and Curtis Morrison are currently under investigation by the FBI for illicitly taping a campaign conversation between McConnell and a handful of his advisors. During the conversation McConnell and his aides discussed the potential candidacy of actress Ashley Judd — including using her mental health problems against her.

    For days, Democrats in the state and nationally have sought to cast the duo as a pair of bungling amateurs who simply got in over their heads and made a series of bad decisions. But the White House visit suggests the distance from Reilly to his party's leaders may not have been quite that far.

    The White House visitors log, showing Reilly met with administration officials Dec. 5th, appears to have been signed in by Victoria McCullough, a staff assistant to Obama confidante Valerie Jarrett.