Lawboy...Congrats!
Taliban suppress women much like republicans
It's a wonder he makes it through the day without killing himself.
We have a winner...
posted at 4/28/2011 8:30 AM EDT
Re: We have a winner...
posted at 4/28/2011 8:33 AM EDT
Re: We have a winner...
posted at 4/28/2011 8:37 AM EDT
This post has been removed.
Re: We have a winner...
posted at 4/28/2011 8:49 AM EDT
This post has been removed.
Re: We have a winner...
posted at 4/28/2011 9:13 AM EDT
Re: We have a winner...
posted at 4/28/2011 9:15 AM EDT
Re: We have a winner...
posted at 4/28/2011 10:13 AM EDT
Re: We have a winner...
posted at 4/28/2011 10:18 AM EDT
Lawboy - you really shouldn't be drinking this heavily in the morning. I mean I get it that it's noon somewhere in the world but come on....
This post has been removed.
Re: We have a winner...
posted at 4/28/2011 10:26 AM EDT
Re: We have a winner...
posted at 4/28/2011 10:28 AM EDT
Re: We have a winner...
posted at 4/28/2011 10:41 AM EDT
Re: We have a winner...
posted at 4/28/2011 10:46 AM EDT
With Senator Scott Brown saying he will vote to repeal "Don't Ask Don't Tell" if it comes up for a stand alone vote in the Senate he recovers, slightly, from his initial vote against it but will his Republican colleagues follow? With Brown saying he will vote for it if it comes up Senate Republicans no longer appear to have the votes for a filibuster but it still has to come up for a vote in the Senate and time is a wastin'. In recent days Republicans have shownlittle interest in taking it up again as they are focusing more on the controversial omnibus spending bill.
Recent polling indicates that an overwhelming majority of Americans support the repeal of DADT and the Pentagon has officially stated that repealing the legislation would have minimal impact on military operations. A majority of active duty military personnel have said that repealing the bill would not have a negative impact. Even the most stringent opponent of this could point to Department of Defense and say "I listened to the generals" as their cover. Many won't because they're probably scared of the social conservative lobby.
Long term trends point towards a more accepting view of gays not just in the military but in everyday life and the Republicans should recognize these changes. In the long and short term Republicans are foolish to continue opposing the repeal of this law. It is an outdated relic of some long forgotten moral code where being openly gay was something to be ashamed of.
Re: We have a winner...
posted at 4/28/2011 10:48 AM EDT
Republican congressional leaders have joined local activists in a court fight to allow voters to decide whether same-sex marriage should be legal in the District, underscoring the continued uncertainty surrounding the issue.
Re: We have a winner...
posted at 4/28/2011 10:50 AM EDT
Re: We have a winner...
posted at 4/28/2011 10:50 AM EDT
The 1980s culture wars are back. Incoming House Speaker John Boehner and House Majority Leader Eric Cantor have called on the Smithsonian to dismantle a groundbreaking art exhibit focused on same-sex attraction, threatening to de-fund the federally-sponsored institution if it does not do so.
The exhibit, “Hide/Seek: Difference and Desire in American Portraiture,” at the Smithsonian's National Portrait Gallery is "the first major museum exhibition" focused on gender and sexual identity in American culture, celebrating "gay and lesbian art and delineat[ing] its place in the history of American painting and photography."
For soon-to-be reigning House Republicans, the thought of exploring gay sexuality in a museum settling is apparently an outrage, and they wasted no time lobbing absurd and baseless threats at the institution. Cantor called it an "outrageous use of taxpayer money and an obvious attempt to offend Christians during the Christmas season," while Boehner said "Smithsonian officials should either acknowledge the mistake and correct it, or be prepared to face tough scrutiny beginning in January when the new majority in the House moves to end the job-killing spending spree in Washington."
Although federal funds are only used at the Smithsonian to support buildings, staff, and the care of artworks (i.e., taxpayer dollars did not pay for the exhibit in question), Smithsonian leaders were rattled enough by the right-wing backlash that they agreed to take down one controversial piece, a four-minute video by David Wojnarowicz, who died from AIDS in 1992, that includes 11 seconds of a crucifix with ants crawling on it.
Blake Gopnik of the WashingtonPost.com, who wrote a compelling review of "Hide/Seek" when it opened in early November, notes:
This fuss is about the larger topic of the show: Gay love, and images of it. The headline that ran on [the Post's] coverage of the matter on the right-wing Web site CNSnews.com mentioned the crucifix—but as only one item in a list of the exhibition’s ‘shockers’ that included ‘naked brothers kissing, genitalia and Ellen DeGeneres grabbing her breast.’ (Through a bra, one might note, in an image that’s less shocking than many moves by Lady Gaga.)
Re: We have a winner...
posted at 4/28/2011 10:53 AM EDT
Re: We have a winner...
posted at 4/28/2011 10:56 AM EDT
Re: We have a winner...
posted at 4/28/2011 10:58 AM EDT
Re: We have a winner...
posted at 4/28/2011 11:13 AM EDT
This post has been removed.
Re: We have a winner...
posted at 4/28/2011 11:58 AM EDT
Re: We have a winner...
posted at 4/28/2011 12:01 PM EDT