Where is the coverage of the Bengazi hearings?

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from slomag. Show slomag's posts

    Re: Where is the coverage of the Bengazi hearings?

    In response to tvoter's comment:

    "swampland" is your source?

    smells like teen fear! lol



    It's too late to blame the source game - every version of the talking points has been made public (http://abcnews.go.com/images/Politics/Benghazi%20Talking%20Points%20Timeline.pdf) as well as every email regarding the talking points.

    Go ahead - make your case for impeachment.  I'll wait Mr. Trump.

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from slomag. Show slomag's posts

    Re: Where is the coverage of the Bengazi hearings?

    In response to skeeter20's comment:

    In response to A_Concerned_Citizen's comment:

     

    Friday, Sept. 14, Gen. David Petraeus goes to the Hill to brief lawmakers. It is unclear which version he relates, the video demonstration or the deliberate attack. The lawmakers ask for talking points. In their first incarnation the talking points from CIA combine the narrative, saying the attack was “spontaneous inspired” by the anti-Muslim video but that CIA did “know that Islamic extremists with ties to al Qa’ida” participated.

     



    A story quickly dispelled long before Rice went on the talk show, Obama went to the U.N., and Hillary told the families of the killed about the video.

     

    Face it.  The Obama administration has been caught in a masisve cover up.




    Dispelled by whom?  Still no links supporting this narrative.

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from Sistersledge. Show Sistersledge's posts

    Re: Where is the coverage of the Bengazi hearings?

    Now we know more about Benghazi than most GOP politicians

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from StalkingButler. Show StalkingButler's posts

    Re: Where is the coverage of the Bengazi hearings?

    We know far more about General Petraeus's affair than we do about Benghazi.

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from tvoter. Show tvoter's posts

    Re: Where is the coverage of the Bengazi hearings?

    Has anyone from the left done anything other than deflect and defend in light of these serious issues?

    Where is the accountibility?

     

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from Sistersledge. Show Sistersledge's posts

    Re: Where is the coverage of the Bengazi hearings?

    In response to StalkingButler's comment:

    We know far more about General Petraeus's affair than we do about Benghazi.




    Is that the guy who cheated on his wife ?

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from Sistersledge. Show Sistersledge's posts

    Re: Where is the coverage of the Bengazi hearings?

    In response to tvoter's comment:

    Has anyone from the left done anything other than deflect and defend in light of these serious issues?

    Where is the accountibility?

     




    Hey the left didn't want to cut the fundings for Embassy Security .....

     
  8. This post has been removed.

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from FortySixAndTwo. Show FortySixAndTwo's posts

    Re: Where is the coverage of the Bengazi hearings?

    So Airbornes new thing is "neo-con-poops" rather than his old tried and true "whacko wingnuts"

    Not sure which one I like better. 

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from StalkingButler. Show StalkingButler's posts

    Re: Where is the coverage of the Bengazi hearings?

    Hey the left didn't want to cut the fundings for Embassy Security .....

    Of course not, the only thing "the left" wants to cut is funding for the military.

    Be that as it may, a state department official has already testified under oath that funding was not the issue behind not responding favorably to requests for additional security. Nice try though.

     

     
  11. This post has been removed.

     
  12. This post has been removed.

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from FortySixAndTwo. Show FortySixAndTwo's posts

    Re: Where is the coverage of the Bengazi hearings?

    In response to A_Concerned_Citizen's comment:

    In response to FortySixAndTwo's comment:

     

     

    So Airbornes new thing is "neo-con-poops" rather than his old tried and true "whacko wingnuts"

    Not sure which one I like better. 

     

     




    And now you're reporting my posts...sad.

    Sorry that you have such delicate eyes....

     



    I am? Based on what evidence? I mean really? Do we have to go down this road AGAIN? 

     
  14. This post has been removed.

     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from FortySixAndTwo. Show FortySixAndTwo's posts

    Re: Where is the coverage of the Bengazi hearings?

    In response to A_Concerned_Citizen's comment:

    In response to FortySixAndTwo's comment:

     

    In response to A_Concerned_Citizen's comment:

     

    In response to FortySixAndTwo's comment:

     

     

    So Airbornes new thing is "neo-con-poops" rather than his old tried and true "whacko wingnuts"

    Not sure which one I like better. 

     

     




    And now you're reporting my posts...sad.

    Sorry that you have such delicate eyes....

     

     



    I am? Based on what evidence? I mean really? Do we have to go down this road AGAIN? 

     

     




    The same evidence you like to use.... I just know it.

     



    HAHAHAHAHA...still a coward I see. 

     
  16. This post has been removed.

     
  17. You have chosen to ignore posts from FortySixAndTwo. Show FortySixAndTwo's posts

    Re: Where is the coverage of the Bengazi hearings?

    In response to A_Concerned_Citizen's comment:

    In response to FortySixAndTwo's comment:

     

    In response to A_Concerned_Citizen's comment:

     

    In response to FortySixAndTwo's comment:

     

    In response to A_Concerned_Citizen's comment:

     

    In response to FortySixAndTwo's comment:

     

     

    So Airbornes new thing is "neo-con-poops" rather than his old tried and true "whacko wingnuts"

    Not sure which one I like better. 

     

     




    And now you're reporting my posts...sad.

    Sorry that you have such delicate eyes....

     

     



    I am? Based on what evidence? I mean really? Do we have to go down this road AGAIN? 

     

     




    The same evidence you like to use.... I just know it.

     

     



    HAHAHAHAHA...still a coward I see. 

     

     




    Ohhh, you're sooooo tough.

     

    I'm soooo scared.

     

    Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeee



    HAHAHAHA....not Airborne eh? : )  OOPSIE!

     
  18. This post has been removed.

     
  19. You have chosen to ignore posts from FortySixAndTwo. Show FortySixAndTwo's posts

    Re: Where is the coverage of the Bengazi hearings?

    In response to A_Concerned_Citizen's comment:

    In response to FortySixAndTwo's comment:

     

    In response to A_Concerned_Citizen's comment:

     

    In response to FortySixAndTwo's comment:

     

    In response to A_Concerned_Citizen's comment:

     

    In response to FortySixAndTwo's comment:

     

    In response to A_Concerned_Citizen's comment:

     

    In response to FortySixAndTwo's comment:

     

     

    So Airbornes new thing is "neo-con-poops" rather than his old tried and true "whacko wingnuts"

    Not sure which one I like better. 

     

     




    And now you're reporting my posts...sad.

    Sorry that you have such delicate eyes....

     

     



    I am? Based on what evidence? I mean really? Do we have to go down this road AGAIN? 

     

     




    The same evidence you like to use.... I just know it.

     

     



    HAHAHAHAHA...still a coward I see. 

     

     




    Ohhh, you're sooooo tough.

     

    I'm soooo scared.

     

    Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

     



    HAHAHAHA....not Airborne eh? : )  OOPSIE!

     

     




    Let me guesss.... you just know who I am.

     

    Whether it's airborn or angryman or that dave guy or that pitchfork guy...you just know this stuff because you call people cowards on an anonymous discussion board.

    Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee



    Um...no. I know it because of your writing style. I also know it because you're using "weeeeeee". Which is something I use. Except that I haven't really used it in quite some time. In fact pretty much haven't used it since you were kicked off as Airborne. I mean...if you're as new as you pretend then how could you know I use that??? WHOOPS!

     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from skeeter20. Show skeeter20's posts

    Re: Where is the coverage of the Bengazi hearings?

    In response to slomag's comment:

    In response to skeeter20's comment:

     

    In response to A_Concerned_Citizen's comment:

     

    Friday, Sept. 14, Gen. David Petraeus goes to the Hill to brief lawmakers. It is unclear which version he relates, the video demonstration or the deliberate attack. The lawmakers ask for talking points. In their first incarnation the talking points from CIA combine the narrative, saying the attack was “spontaneous inspired” by the anti-Muslim video but that CIA did “know that Islamic extremists with ties to al Qa’ida” participated.

     



    A story quickly dispelled long before Rice went on the talk show, Obama went to the U.N., and Hillary told the families of the killed about the video.

     

    Face it.  The Obama administration has been caught in a masisve cover up.

     




     

    Dispelled by whom?  Still no links supporting this narrative.



    I provided them in another forum.  Not going to waste my time here, again, just because you won't read 'em.

     
  21. This post has been removed.

     
  22. You have chosen to ignore posts from FortySixAndTwo. Show FortySixAndTwo's posts

    Re: Where is the coverage of the Bengazi hearings?

    In response to A_Concerned_Citizen's comment:

    In response to FortySixAndTwo's comment:

     

    In response to A_Concerned_Citizen's comment:

     

    In response to FortySixAndTwo's comment:

     

    In response to A_Concerned_Citizen's comment:

     

    In response to FortySixAndTwo's comment:

     

    In response to A_Concerned_Citizen's comment:

     

    In response to FortySixAndTwo's comment:

     

    In response to A_Concerned_Citizen's comment:

     

    In response to FortySixAndTwo's comment:

     

     

    So Airbornes new thing is "neo-con-poops" rather than his old tried and true "whacko wingnuts"

    Not sure which one I like better. 

     

     




    And now you're reporting my posts...sad.

    Sorry that you have such delicate eyes....

     

     



    I am? Based on what evidence? I mean really? Do we have to go down this road AGAIN? 

     

     




    The same evidence you like to use.... I just know it.

     

     



    HAHAHAHAHA...still a coward I see. 

     

     




    Ohhh, you're sooooo tough.

     

    I'm soooo scared.

     

    Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

     



    HAHAHAHA....not Airborne eh? : )  OOPSIE!

     

     




    Let me guesss.... you just know who I am.

     

    Whether it's airborn or angryman or that dave guy or that pitchfork guy...you just know this stuff because you call people cowards on an anonymous discussion board.

    Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

     



    Um...no. I know it because of your writing style. I also know it because you're using "weeeeeee". Which is something I use. Except that I haven't really used it in quite some time. In fact pretty much haven't used it since you were kicked off as Airborne. I mean...if you're as new as you pretend then how could you know I use that??? WHOOPS!

     

     




    Seriously?

     

    You're trademarking that?

    Of course it couldn't be this:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hxRoXuPjAKc



    Trademark? Not quite. I've done my job. Welcome back Airborne!!! Hahahaha...I know it burns your a55 you've been outed. Especially by me. If you had only had the balls at the 99 to step up and be a man. Oh well.

     
  23. This post has been removed.

     
  24. You have chosen to ignore posts from FortySixAndTwo. Show FortySixAndTwo's posts

    Re: Where is the coverage of the Bengazi hearings?

    In response to A_Concerned_Citizen's comment:

    In response to FortySixAndTwo's comment:

     

    In response to A_Concerned_Citizen's comment:

     

    In response to FortySixAndTwo's comment:

     

    In response to A_Concerned_Citizen's comment:

     

    In response to FortySixAndTwo's comment:

     

    In response to A_Concerned_Citizen's comment:

     

    In response to FortySixAndTwo's comment:

     

    In response to A_Concerned_Citizen's comment:

     

    In response to FortySixAndTwo's comment:

     

    In response to A_Concerned_Citizen's comment:

     

    In response to FortySixAndTwo's comment:

     

     

    So Airbornes new thing is "neo-con-poops" rather than his old tried and true "whacko wingnuts"

    Not sure which one I like better. 

     

     




    And now you're reporting my posts...sad.

    Sorry that you have such delicate eyes....

     

     



    I am? Based on what evidence? I mean really? Do we have to go down this road AGAIN? 

     

     




    The same evidence you like to use.... I just know it.

     

     



    HAHAHAHAHA...still a coward I see. 

     

     




    Ohhh, you're sooooo tough.

     

    I'm soooo scared.

     

    Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

     



    HAHAHAHA....not Airborne eh? : )  OOPSIE!

     

     




    Let me guesss.... you just know who I am.

     

    Whether it's airborn or angryman or that dave guy or that pitchfork guy...you just know this stuff because you call people cowards on an anonymous discussion board.

    Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

     



    Um...no. I know it because of your writing style. I also know it because you're using "weeeeeee". Which is something I use. Except that I haven't really used it in quite some time. In fact pretty much haven't used it since you were kicked off as Airborne. I mean...if you're as new as you pretend then how could you know I use that??? WHOOPS!

     

     




    Seriously?

     

    You're trademarking that?

    Of course it couldn't be this:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hxRoXuPjAKc

     



    Trademark? Not quite. I've done my job. Welcome back Airborne!!! Hahahaha...I know it burns your a55 you've been outed. Especially by me. If you had only had the balls at the 99 to step up and be a man. Oh well.

     

     




    Yep, you just know things....on an anonymous board....with a catch phrase from a popular commercial as your 'proof'.

     

     

    Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee



    Like I said....your writing style. It's painfully obvious. Don't get mad at me because you're too much of a coward to be open about who you are.

     

     
  25. You have chosen to ignore posts from FortySixAndTwo. Show FortySixAndTwo's posts

    Re: Where is the coverage of the Bengazi hearings?

    In response to bigdog2's comment:

    In response to FortySixAndTwo's comment:

     

    In response to A_Concerned_Citizen's comment:

     

    In response to FortySixAndTwo's comment:

     

    In response to A_Concerned_Citizen's comment:

     

    In response to FortySixAndTwo's comment:

     

    In response to A_Concerned_Citizen's comment:

     

    In response to FortySixAndTwo's comment:

     

    In response to A_Concerned_Citizen's comment:

     

    In response to FortySixAndTwo's comment:

     

    In response to A_Concerned_Citizen's comment:

     

    In response to FortySixAndTwo's comment:

     

     

    So Airbornes new thing is "neo-con-poops" rather than his old tried and true "whacko wingnuts"

    Not sure which one I like better. 

     

     




    And now you're reporting my posts...sad.

    Sorry that you have such delicate eyes....

     

     



    I am? Based on what evidence? I mean really? Do we have to go down this road AGAIN? 

     

     




    The same evidence you like to use.... I just know it.

     

     



    HAHAHAHAHA...still a coward I see. 

     

     




    Ohhh, you're sooooo tough.

     

    I'm soooo scared.

     

    Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

     



    HAHAHAHA....not Airborne eh? : )  OOPSIE!

     

     




    Let me guesss.... you just know who I am.

     

    Whether it's airborn or angryman or that dave guy or that pitchfork guy...you just know this stuff because you call people cowards on an anonymous discussion board.

    Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

     



    Um...no. I know it because of your writing style. I also know it because you're using "weeeeeee". Which is something I use. Except that I haven't really used it in quite some time. In fact pretty much haven't used it since you were kicked off as Airborne. I mean...if you're as new as you pretend then how could you know I use that??? WHOOPS!

     

     




    Seriously?

     

    You're trademarking that?

    Of course it couldn't be this:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hxRoXuPjAKc

     



    Trademark? Not quite. I've done my job. Welcome back Airborne!!! Hahahaha...I know it burns your a55 you've been outed. Especially by me. If you had only had the balls at the 99 to step up and be a man. Oh well.

     

     




     

    He did a good job (for a while) keeping his temper under control.  Gotta give him credit.



    He always starts out subdued to try to fool people into thinking he's someone different but then his true colors come out. He gives it away everytime. It's telling that he wants to hide who he is. I admit fully who I am whenever I've had to get a new name. I guess he's embarrassed to admit who he is. 

     

Share