Where is the coverage of the Bengazi hearings?

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from Sistersledge. Show Sistersledge's posts

    Re: Where is the coverage of the Bengazi hearings?

    In response to skeeter20's comment:

    In response to tvoter's comment:

     

    http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2013/05/10/White-House-Benghazi-off-the-record

    whitehouse meets privately with select reporters?

     




    They aren't "reporters" as much as they are "supporters".

    This is to give them the game plan.




    Sounds like dubya and faux during those Dark Days for the US of A !

     
  2. This post has been removed.

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from skeeter20. Show skeeter20's posts

    Re: Where is the coverage of the Bengazi hearings?

    In response to Sistersledge's comment:

    bigdog where is the coverup ..... there is no new information that came out of these hearings ....




    Get the wax out of your ears.  TONS of new info.

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from skeeter20. Show skeeter20's posts

    Re: Where is the coverage of the Bengazi hearings?

    In response to jedwardnicky's comment:

    In response to skeeter20's comment:

     

    In response to A_Concerned_Citizen's comment:

     

    In response to bigdog2's comment:

     

     

    Question him on what?

     

     

     

     

     




    Oh I don't know, maybe question him on anyof the 54 attacks and 13 dead Americans...

     

     

    As a starter;

    "Have you changed any security at our embassies after the 3rd, 10th, 20th...54th attack?"

    "If so, why are Americans still dying?"

    "What do you propose to do in order to ensure the safety of our diplomatic corps around the world?"

     

    And then you could ask the same questions the neo-cons are asking of this admin:

     

    "Why didn't you forsee the possibility of the 3rd, 10th, 20th...54th attack?"

    "Why didn't you change security after the 1st death or the 4th death or the 10th death of an American overseas?"

     

     

     

     

    So, is your poisn't that Obama gets to skate because stuff happened under Bush?  Tat quite a lax standard you have there.

    Many, many of these attacks happened in war zones, and to the best of my memory, none of them were covered up like Benghazi.  nor we're any Ambassadors killed.

     

    Obama lied, an ambassador died.

     

     

     

    Skeeter, we're all concerned about you. Here's a link you might want to check out.......

    http://www.aaboston.org/




    Nice!

    You are losing the argument so, start the personal attacks.

    It must really rankle you that the story is finally coming to light, real journalism triumphing over the activist journalism you push.

    You keep this up and you will become part of the Obama press office for sure.

     

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from Sistersledge. Show Sistersledge's posts

    Re: Where is the coverage of the Bengazi hearings?

    Hey conspiracy freaks ... google Bob Cocker .... read what his feelings are about Benghazi ....why didn't Issa call Thomas Pickering or General Petraeus to testify during these hearings ... would it be that their testimony isn't what they want to hear .....

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from Sistersledge. Show Sistersledge's posts

    Re: Where is the coverage of the Bengazi hearings?

    In response to skeeter20's comment:

    In response to Sistersledge's comment:

     

    bigdog where is the coverup ..... there is no new information that came out of these hearings ....

     




    Get the wax out of your ears.  TONS of new info.

     




    what new info .... give examples .....

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from StalkingButler. Show StalkingButler's posts

    Re: Where is the coverage of the Bengazi hearings?

    Apparently someone told Boston.com about Benghazi:


    http://www.boston.com/news/politics/2013/05/10/state-dep-sought-change-libya-talking-points/yzLWgGdvIkspwWpPNXWjXL/story.html

     

    It's nice to be informed about the issues of the day.

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from slomag. Show slomag's posts

    Re: Where is the coverage of the Bengazi hearings?

    In response to Sistersledge's comment:

    In response to skeeter20's comment:

     

    In response to Sistersledge's comment:

     

    bigdog where is the coverup ..... there is no new information that came out of these hearings ....

     




    Get the wax out of your ears.  TONS of new info.

     

     




    what new info .... give examples .....

     



    The CIA drafted talkng points that suggesting the CIA told everybody there were a lot of terrorists in Libya so it shouldn't be hung out to dry for this mess.  So the state department said "that's not fair - now you're hanging us out to dry" and somebody at the CIA agreed because ultimately all edits were made by the intelligence community.

    And our conservative friends, who can smell conspiracy, have now turned their noses to the State Dept and Hillary Clinton because Obama cannot run again in 2016.   And even though they will rail for hours about money spent on scientific studies they don't care about, they don't have a problem spending millions of dollars and countless hours on nine hearings about talking points.

    The coverage is where it should be - Fox News, Breitbart, the conservative bubble, and this forum.  

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from nhsteven. Show nhsteven's posts

    Re: Where is the coverage of the Bengazi hearings?

    In response to slomag's comment:

     

    In response to Sistersledge's comment:

     

    In response to skeeter20's comment:

     

    In response to Sistersledge's comment:

     

    bigdog where is the coverup ..... there is no new information that came out of these hearings ....

     




    Get the wax out of your ears.  TONS of new info.

     

     




    what new info .... give examples .....

     

     



    The CIA drafted talkng points that suggesting the CIA told everybody there were a lot of terrorists in Libya so it shouldn't be hung out to dry for this mess.  So the state department said "that's not fair - now you're hanging us out to dry" and somebody at the CIA agreed because ultimately all edits were made by the intelligence community.

     

    And our conservative friends, who can smell conspiracy, have now turned their noses to the State Dept and Hillary Clinton because Obama cannot run again in 2016.   And even though they will rail for hours about money spent on scientific studies they don't care about, they don't have a problem spending millions of dollars and countless hours on nine hearings about talking points.

    The coverage is where it should be - Fox News, Breitbart, the conservative bubble, and this forum.  

     



     

    The Republicans are obsessed with this incident, aren't they? If not this, I'm sure it would be something else.

    Prediction time: After what Lindsay Graham said recently that this "Appears To Be As Bad As Watergate", expect them to initiate impeachment proceedings; not that it shall work; but the modus operandi going forward these for these crackpots is to impeach every sitting Dem President.

    And yet, these numbnuts were completely silent about the the war criminal/profiteer Cheney and his duped accomplice W, (Resulting in an explosion of red ink), the related Valerie Plame & Abu Ghraib incidents, the Justice Dept scandal where subpeonas went unanswered, Katrina, 9/11, the deregulation of Wall St,  the tax cuts for the uber wealthy, and a dozen or so similar breaches on par with Benghazi (except no ambassadors were killed) during the previous admin.

    I believe the motive here is to think it shall help with constituents in 2014 & 2016 (including bringing down Hillary), not realizing that the recent failed gun control legislation (where 84-90% of the populace was in favor of, depending on what survey you look at) and women's rights are far more important to them; to wit; yesterday, I unexpectedly saw in my town an angry bipartisan rally decrying the lack of a weapons background check.

     
  10. This post has been removed.

     
  11. This post has been removed.

     
  12. This post has been removed.

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from skeeter20. Show skeeter20's posts

    Re: Where is the coverage of the Bengazi hearings?

    In response to A_Concerned_Citizen's comment:

    In response to bigdog2's comment:

     

    Question him on what?


    Oh I don't know, maybe question him on anyof the 54 attacks and 13 dead Americans...

     

     

    As a starter;

    "Have you changed any security at our embassies after the 3rd, 10th, 20th...54th attack?"

    "If so, why are Americans still dying?"

    "What do you propose to do in order to ensure the safety of our diplomatic corps around the world?"

     

    And then you could ask the same questions the neo-cons are asking of this admin:

     

    "Why didn't you forsee the possibility of the 3rd, 10th, 20th...54th attack?"

    "Why didn't you change security after the 1st death or the 4th death or the 10th death of an American overseas?"

     

     

     

     




     

    Again........................you`re missing the point.  It wasn`t the act, it was the COVERUP!

     




     

    I thought I was answering your question of what the neo-cons should have been asking Bush, but apparently you don't really care about the other 13 dead diplomats or the 54 previous attacks on our facilities around the world, just this attack and just these four Americans.

    I guess the lives of American diplomats are expendable under a neo-con admin.

     

     

     




    You can dredge up all sorts of stuff about Bush.  how does this innoculate Obama?

     

     
  14. This post has been removed.

     
  15. This post has been removed.

     
  16. This post has been removed.

     
  17. This post has been removed.

     
  18. This post has been removed.

     
  19. This post has been removed.

     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from Sistersledge. Show Sistersledge's posts

    Re: Where is the coverage of the Bengazi hearings?

     
  21. This post has been removed.

     
  22. You have chosen to ignore posts from Sistersledge. Show Sistersledge's posts

    Re: Where is the coverage of the Bengazi hearings?

     
  23. You have chosen to ignore posts from Sistersledge. Show Sistersledge's posts

    Re: Where is the coverage of the Bengazi hearings?

     
  24. You have chosen to ignore posts from Sistersledge. Show Sistersledge's posts

    Re: Where is the coverage of the Bengazi hearings?

     
  25. You have chosen to ignore posts from Sistersledge. Show Sistersledge's posts

    Re: Where is the coverage of the Bengazi hearings?

    Big Dog make sure you watch Meet the Press tomorrow morning

     

Share