Guess shupe was rignt.
Unreal "not enough evidence" is the reason what a bunch of B S
Burrows not suspended its officall acording to 985 the sports hub
-
Burrows not suspended its officall acording to 985 the sports hub
posted at 6/2/2011 2:47 PM EDT
- LUCICmilan17
- Posts: 1776
- First: 2/18/2011
- Last: 4/17/2012
-
This post has been removed.
-
Re: Burrows not suspended its offically acording to 985 the sports hub
posted at 6/2/2011 2:54 PM EDT
- 86redsox
- Posts: 2029
- First: 7/21/2007
- Last: 5/23/2013
well we know whose teeth to knock out now. -
Re: Burrows not suspended its offically acording to 985 the sports hub
posted at 6/2/2011 2:56 PM EDT
- maddog2020
- Posts: 1715
- First: 4/25/2006
- Last: 10/18/2011
Did anybody hear the Vancouver guy crying about the Colin Campell to Felger and Amonte - I wonder what he has to say about this? -
This post has been removed.
-
Re: Burrows not suspended its offically acording to 985 the sports hub
posted at 6/2/2011 3:06 PM EDT
- 49-North
- Posts: 1359
- First: 5/28/2011
- Last: 5/23/2013
In Response to Re: Burrows not suspended its offically acording to 985 the sports hub:Can someone explain how this makes sense? No evidence? There is video and physical evidence. What is the league reasoning???? When was the last time a dirty or cheap play went punished when it was against a Bruins player????? 1995?
Posted by RidingWithTheKing
Seriously? Chara got away with a near-decapitation of Pachioretty, and you're complaining about an alleged bite? -
Re: Burrows not suspended its offically acording to 985 the sports hub
posted at 6/2/2011 3:08 PM EDT
- olsonstephanie
- Posts: 500
- First: 11/8/2009
- Last: 7/9/2011
How can this Alex Burrows even call himself an NHL player? It's one thing to be criticized for rough play - but for biting? What a sissy. A real man's man. -
Re: Burrows not suspended its offically acording to 985 the sports hub
posted at 6/2/2011 3:10 PM EDT
- Newfiebullet
- Posts: 460
- First: 4/7/2010
- Last: 5/5/2013
Should be suspended for a classless act.
But it is hard to complain when we had a guy on the Bruins last season in the playoffs who was a repeat offender when it comes to biting & got no suspension.
Therefore, as a Bruins fan it is hard to complain when it happens to one of our guys. Kind of hypocritical. -
Re: Burrows not suspended its offically acording to 985 the sports hub
posted at 6/2/2011 3:11 PM EDT
- bostonbruins69
- Posts: 112
- First: 7/5/2009
- Last: 2/23/2012
In Response to Re: Burrows not suspended its offically acording to 985 the sports hub:In Response to Re: Burrows not suspended its offically acording to 985 the sports hub : Seriously? Chara got away with a near-decapitation of Pachioretty, and you're complaining about an alleged bite?
Posted by 49-North
Too bad that was a legal hit. and I mean who bites someone? I guess the same guy that pulls on a dudes hair during a scrum. What a pu**. -
This post has been removed.
-
Re: Burrows not suspended its offically acording to 985 the sports hub
posted at 6/2/2011 3:12 PM EDT
- TimThomas-god
- Posts: 1092
- First: 9/12/2009
- Last: 7/17/2011
As stated above, there is video evidence! Not to mention, Burrows himself said "I don't know" when asked if he bit Bergeron. I don't know = YES. -
Re: Burrows not suspended its offically acording to 985 the sports hub
posted at 6/2/2011 3:12 PM EDT
- 4FortheCup
- Posts: 169
- First: 5/31/2011
- Last: 6/15/2011
In Response to Re: Burrows not suspended its offically acording to 985 the sports hub:How can this Alex Burrows even call himself an NHL player? It's one thing to be criticized for rough play - but for biting? What a sissy. A real man's man.What about Savard he did the same...
Posted by olsonstephanie -
Re: Burrows not suspended its offically acording to 985 the sports hub
posted at 6/2/2011 3:13 PM EDT
- Kennedy97
- Posts: 1411
- First: 7/2/2008
- Last: 5/22/2013
Another shocking decision by the NHL. And by "shocking" I mean "completely predictable in its stupidity". -
Re: Burrows not suspended its offically acording to 985 the sports hub
posted at 6/2/2011 3:14 PM EDT
- 4FortheCup
- Posts: 169
- First: 5/31/2011
- Last: 6/15/2011
In Response to Re: Burrows not suspended its offically acording to 985 the sports hub:In Response to Re: Burrows not suspended its offically acording to 985 the sports hub : Seriously? Chara got away with a near-decapitation of Pachioretty, and you're complaining about an alleged bite?
Posted by 49-North
:) i forgot this one....good one bro -
Re: Burrows not suspended its offically acording to 985 the sports hub
posted at 6/2/2011 3:17 PM EDT
- LUCICmilan17
- Posts: 1776
- First: 2/18/2011
- Last: 4/17/2012
I guess our players can bite the canucks fingers then is the message I am getting from the league
-
This post has been removed.
-
Re: Burrows not suspended its offically acording to 985 the sports hub
posted at 6/2/2011 3:18 PM EDT
- olsonstephanie
- Posts: 500
- First: 11/8/2009
- Last: 7/9/2011
I think this is just what the Bruins need for Game 2. They need a reason to hate Vancouver. They found one. Hopefully this brings out the nasty in Lucic and Horton. -
Re: Burrows not suspended its offically acording to 985 the sports hub
posted at 6/2/2011 3:18 PM EDT
- bostonguy67
- Posts: 69
- First: 7/12/2009
- Last: 1/30/2012
There's no biting...there's no biting in hockey!
I hope Burrows gets to bite Lucic's fist
-
Re: Burrows not suspended its offically acording to 985 the sports hub
posted at 6/2/2011 3:22 PM EDT
- deejm2112
- Posts: 291
- First: 7/12/2009
- Last: 1/30/2012
wow...it's on NHL.com too....maybe we should all start calling 911? -
Re: Burrows not suspended its offically acording to 985 the sports hub
posted at 6/2/2011 3:23 PM EDT
- seobrien
- Posts: 1366
- First: 3/25/2006
- Last: 5/23/2013
why is anyone surprised?
...and please, trolls, don't start with the "alleged" schpeel.
He bit him as clear as day, and it is the mark of a real wussy. No arguing that.
Lets see what you would say if a Nyuck got bit. Hypocrites. If it was a Bruin who did it, I'd support a suspension.
Burrows = baby and sissy. Babies and sissies bite. -
Re: Burrows not suspended its offically acording to 985 the sports hub
posted at 6/2/2011 3:24 PM EDT
- crono420
- Posts: 2518
- First: 12/10/2006
- Last: 12/4/2011
Its all good. The whole world saw it an now knows what kind of team the Canucks are. They have embarressed themselves in front of the whole continent. We can now always call them biters lol -
Re: Burrows not suspended its officall acording to 985 the sports hub
posted at 6/2/2011 5:27 PM EDT
- LUCICmilan17
- Posts: 1776
- First: 2/18/2011
- Last: 4/17/2012
Not the that the bruins needed any more motivation since its the finals but this has to add some -
Re: Burrows not suspended its officall acording to 985 the sports hub
posted at 6/2/2011 5:44 PM EDT
- Voyageurs
- Posts: 3
- First: 4/22/2011
- Last: 6/2/2011
He may have actually biten him, but I don't think it was intentional.
Not sure he knew it was Bergeron's finger.
You know, like Ferrence finger kind of thing, like Ferrence cheap shot on Halpern, like Chara didn't know it was Pacioretti on the ice. -
Re: Burrows not suspended its officall acording to 985 the sports hub
posted at 6/2/2011 5:47 PM EDT
- 4FortheCup
- Posts: 169
- First: 5/31/2011
- Last: 6/15/2011
Good post voyageurs!
-
Re: Burrows not suspended its officall acording to 985 the sports hub
posted at 6/2/2011 5:50 PM EDT
- LUCICmilan17
- Posts: 1776
- First: 2/18/2011
- Last: 4/17/2012
If a bruin bit a canuck I wouldn't even try to defend it