Chiarelli gets 4 year extension

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from marco0863. Show marco0863's posts

    Re: Chiarelli gets 4 year extension

    In response to bostonfan191646's comment:

    marco loses. 



    lots of self proclaimed winners here must be after so many losses

    I lostNothing

    read the books  if u think gorton was talking to chia at 2006 draft ur nuts 

    and I read from another blogger he was at tabke 

    shoukd have checjeit out

    and ur video solves nothing I

     

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from 50belowzero. Show 50belowzero's posts

    Re: Chiarelli gets 4 year extension

    Wow,great reading, glad to be back after a relaxing summer. Hockey is in the air and i am and was a Sinden supporter at least until his last few years. Glad Chiarelli is staying put and good luck to Gorton, he obviously won't be forgotten. 

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from bostonfan191646. Show bostonfan191646's posts

    Re: Chiarelli gets 4 year extension

    In response to marco0863's comment:

    In response to bostonfan191646's comment:

     

    marco loses. 

     



    lots of self proclaimed winners here must be after so many losses

     

    I lostNothing

    read the books  if u think gorton was talking to chia at 2006 draft ur nuts 

    and I read from another blogger he was at tabke 

    shoukd have checjeit out

    and ur video solves nothing I

     



    my video proves you wrong. so do the other ones. everything you have said has been wrong. Chara thanks Mr. Chiarelli for bringing him to Boston. done. 

    you said that Gorton claimed that he wanted kessel so bad that he was thinking about trading the pick if kessel weren't available. So, instead, we have video evidence of Gorton asking the Capitals to trade picks so the Bruins could take Backstrom instead. You're posts have no basis in reality. You pass off farces as researched fact. We don't win, and I never proclaimed victory for anyone, but you, most certainly, lose. 

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from BadHabitude. Show BadHabitude's posts

    Re: Chiarelli gets 4 year extension

    I'm frustrated with this thread.

    I don't understand what marco's point is.

    It might be that Gorton was the main reason for the Bruins 2011 cup, but I can't believe that what he is trying to say because that's just absurd.

     

     
     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from SanDogBrewin. Show SanDogBrewin's posts

    Re: Chiarelli gets 4 year extension

    You have to be kidding BadHab ? 

    Look at the broken english and when he shows up to troll. The hatred for the Bruins in the comment section after an article in TSN has been posted is filled with venom from Laff and Shab fans.

    For some hockey to think Jeromy Jacobs with that much money to an outgoing ASM is hilarious. KPD wrote several articles about the supervised meetings between Chiarelli and the Bruins then scouting staff. MarcoPolo is just getting a rise out of posters that bite on his "delusional bait".

    Chiarelli could have traded any of the 2006 draft picks, Thomas or Rask at anytime but he didnt.

     





     

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from Fletcher1. Show Fletcher1's posts

    Re: Chiarelli gets 4 year extension

    Yeah guys, this is every argument with marco.  He's clearly losing the argument and everyone knows it, but he'll never admit it.  He either doesn't read, or doesn't understand, the posts which correct his delusions.  Then, like a kid who isn't getting enough respect and attention, he just becomes an aggravating little twerp.  Which is why he's had so many accounts banned.  

    At least he's talking Bruins this time, I'll give him that.  Not making any sense, but talking Bruins...it's progress.

    If you think you've seen this before, there were several 'marco...' accounts, winthecup, bruins8, stanjon, and a bunch of others I can't remember.  All the same poster.

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from marco0863. Show marco0863's posts

    Re: Chiarelli gets 4 year extension

    In response to bostonfan191646's comment:

    In response to marco0863's comment:

     

    In response to bostonfan191646's comment:

     

     

     

    marco loses. 

     

     



    lots of self proclaimed winners here must be after so many losses

     

     

    I lostNothing

    read the books  if u think gorton was talking to chia at 2006 draft ur nuts 

    and I read from another blogger he was at tabke 

    shoukd have checjeit out

    and ur video solves nothing I

     

     



    my video proves you wrong. so do the other ones. everything you have said has been wrong. Chara thanks Mr. Chiarelli for bringing him to Boston. done. 

     

    you said that Gorton claimed that he wanted kessel so bad that he was thinking about trading the pick if kessel weren't available. So, instead, we have video evidence of Gorton asking the Capitals to trade picks so the Bruins could take Backstrom instead. You're posts have no basis in reality. You pass off farces as researched fact. We don't win, and I never proclaimed victory for anyone, but you, most certainly, lose. 



    like others have said video makes no sense 

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from marco0863. Show marco0863's posts

    Re: Chiarelli gets 4 year extension

    In response to Fletcher1's comment:

    Yeah guys, this is every argument with marco.  He's clearly losing the argument and everyone knows it, but he'll never admit it.  He either doesn't read, or doesn't understand, the posts which correct his delusions.  Then, like a kid who isn't getting enough respect and attention, he just becomes an aggravating little twerp.  Which is why he's had so many accounts banned.  

    At least he's talking Bruins this time, I'll give him that.  Not making any sense, but talking Bruins...it's progress.

    If you think you've seen this before, there were several 'marco...' accounts, winthecup, bruins8, stanjon, and a bunch of others I can't remember.  All the same poster.


    fletch I am curious to know in ur mind how I lost this argument. do u realky think that because 2or 3 agree with u it makes u more knowledgeable. there is nothing wrong in being wtong 

    so u like to keep to topic

    I showed u what the nucleus and I am quite surprised u dont see it. in fsct it is like ur doing it for the sake of arguing

    2- u can argue all u want about whether or not chia signed him or what chia says  but technicallyGorton was gm when they signed him

    and 2006 like I ckearly showed were all picks from Gorton

    now read and tell me how am Iwrong? dont assume show facts.

    u really think that bcuz two or three agree wuth u ur right I can produce many more thst will findsome posts laughable but I assure u thatif I am with one of u without use of net I will not ve the one outa place

    keep somethingin mind not everything Bruins mgmt do or say is right.

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from red75. Show red75's posts

    Re: Chiarelli gets 4 year extension

    No one said the video made no sense - they said the conversation made no sense, in that it was bad strategically. Not that the veracity of the video was incorrect.

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from marco0863. Show marco0863's posts

    Re: Chiarelli gets 4 year extension

    In response to BadHabitude's comment:

    I'm frustrated with this thread.

    I don't understand what marco's point is.

    It might be that Gorton was the main reason for the Bruins 2011 cup, but I can't believe that what he is trying to say because that's just absurd.

     

     



    well bad hab I am saying that Gorton had lots to do with the cup team of 2011 and why u fail to see that is beyond me. do u wish for me to again find linj that show what he did

    he draftedkessel lucic marchand

    traded for rask 

     

    he was scouting didirector when they draftedbergy and thomad

     

     

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from red75. Show red75's posts

    Re: Chiarelli gets 4 year extension

    You're wrong because even if you include those six players - Chara, Savard, Rask, Kessel, Lucic Marchand - that means only 8 players with their name on the Cup in 2011 predate PC. For their recent run to the Finals, only 7 would predate PC. Only two of the players in 2011 predate May 26, 2006, and 1 from 2013 opredates May 26 2006.

    The simple facts make your argument - that PC did not build the team - completely and unbelievably wrong.

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from marco0863. Show marco0863's posts

    Re: Chiarelli gets 4 year extension

    In response to red75's comment:

    No one said the video made no sense - they said the conversation made no sense, in that it was bad strategically. Not that the veracity of the video was incorrect.



    dont play with words - the vidoe proved nothing certainly did not prove that chiarell drafted those pkayers

    and maybe just maybe thats why tge rangers made girton assistant

    I have necer witnessed sucstubbornness

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from marco0863. Show marco0863's posts

    Re: Chiarelli gets 4 year extension

    In response to SanDogBrewin's comment:

    You have to be kidding BadHab ? 

    Look at the broken english and when he shows up to troll. The hatred for the Bruins in the comment section after an article in TSN has been posted is filled with venom from Laff and Shab fans.

    For some hockey to think Jeromy Jacobs with that much money to an outgoing ASM is hilarious. KPD wrote several articles about the supervised meetings between Chiarelli and the Bruins then scouting staff. MarcoPolo is just getting a rise out of posters that bite on his "delusional bait".

     

    what the heck are you saying- man what a board.u need to get out of these boards.

    where the fk u think those picks came from anyway.

    so u want to give credit for not getting rid of a nucleus that was taking notice from all the NHl.

    Chiarelli could have traded any of the 2006 draft picks, Thomas or Rask at anytime but he didnt.

     





     




     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from marco0863. Show marco0863's posts

    Re: Chiarelli gets 4 year extension

    In response to red75's comment:

    You're wrong because even if you include those six players - Chara, Savard, Rask, Kessel, Lucic Marchand - that means only 8 players with their name on the Cup in 2011 predate PC. For their recent run to the Finals, only 7 would predate PC. Only two of the players in 2011 predate May 26, 2006, and 1 from 2013 opredates May 26 2006.

    The simple facts make your argument - that PC did not build the team - completely and unbelievably wrong.




    Red, once again i said simply that Gorton deserves alot of the credit. If u cannot see this no matter what i say or do nothing will work.

    It is quite simple- answer these questions

    who was the gm when the following was drafted - kesssel, lucic, marchand, who was i believe the scouting director when bergy got drafed, when thomas got signed, kreci drafted?

    answer these questions- answer them as fact.

    now, Chara also signed when Gorton was gm - maybe he signed cuz he knew pc was going to be gm and he knew Pc from Ottawa,

    i cannot believe that only on these boards they totally discredit Gorton. Why do u think the rangers gave him an assistant job the same type Chia had before he became gm

                        

     
  15. This post has been removed.

     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from marco0863. Show marco0863's posts

    Re: Chiarelli gets 4 year extension

    In response to Fletcher1's comment:

    Yeah guys, this is every argument with marco.  He's clearly losing the argument and everyone knows it, but he'll never admit it.  He either doesn't read, or doesn't understand, the posts which correct his delusions.  Then, like a kid who isn't getting enough respect and attention, he just becomes an aggravating little twerp.  Which is why he's had so many accounts banned.  

    At least he's talking Bruins this time, I'll give him that.  Not making any sense, but talking Bruins...it's progress.

    If you think you've seen this before, there were several 'marco...' accounts, winthecup, bruins8, stanjon, and a bunch of others I can't remember.  All the same poster.




    For the last time i do not have many accounts as u say - you are paranoid but if u keep gettin ppl suspended for no valid reason . i will bombard these boards with new posters.

    u wanna talk hockey any time go ahead. Not that iyt makes me richer knowing hockey anyway but whatever

     
  17. You have chosen to ignore posts from red75. Show red75's posts

    Re: Chiarelli gets 4 year extension

    Who was the GM? Peter Chiarelli - fact. Hired on May 26, 2006.

    Who was Acting GM due to pre-existing contractual obligations? Gorton.

    Who had supervised meetings with Bruins scouts and management to discuss how and who he wanted to draft, trade and sign prior to the end of his contractual obligations? Peter Chiarelli.

    Those are all facts, that you seem to willfully ignore.

     
  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from Bookboy007. Show Bookboy007's posts

    Re: Chiarelli gets 4 year extension

    In response to marco0863's comment:

    In response to red75's comment:

     

    No one said the video made no sense - they said the conversation made no sense, in that it was bad strategically. Not that the veracity of the video was incorrect.

     



    dont play with words - the vidoe proved nothing certainly did not prove that chiarell drafted those pkayers

     

    and maybe just maybe thats why tge rangers made girton assistant

    I have necer witnessed sucstubbornness



    He's right, red.  The Zapruder film does not show the Caramilk secret.

     
  19. You have chosen to ignore posts from bostonfan191646. Show bostonfan191646's posts

    Re: Chiarelli gets 4 year extension

    In response to marco0863's comment:

    In response to bostonfan191646's comment:

     

    In response to marco0863's comment:

     

     

     

    In response to bostonfan191646's comment:

     

     

     

     

     

    marco loses. 

     

     

     



    lots of self proclaimed winners here must be after so many losses

     

     

     

    I lostNothing

    read the books  if u think gorton was talking to chia at 2006 draft ur nuts 

    and I read from another blogger he was at tabke 

    shoukd have checjeit out

    and ur video solves nothing I

     

     

     



    my video proves you wrong. so do the other ones. everything you have said has been wrong. Chara thanks Mr. Chiarelli for bringing him to Boston. done. 

     

     

    you said that Gorton claimed that he wanted kessel so bad that he was thinking about trading the pick if kessel weren't available. So, instead, we have video evidence of Gorton asking the Capitals to trade picks so the Bruins could take Backstrom instead. You're posts have no basis in reality. You pass off farces as researched fact. We don't win, and I never proclaimed victory for anyone, but you, most certainly, lose. 

     



    like others have said video makes no sense 

     



    no one else has said the video doesn't make any sense. You are the only one that doesn't think Gorton saying that he wants "the swede" means he wanted backstrom over kessel. the only thing that didn't make sense (and this is what another poster pointed out) was telling the caps who he wanted. 

     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from Fletcher1. Show Fletcher1's posts

    Re: Chiarelli gets 4 year extension

    In response to marco0863's comment:

    In response to Fletcher1's comment:

     

    Yeah guys, this is every argument with marco.  He's clearly losing the argument and everyone knows it, but he'll never admit it.  He either doesn't read, or doesn't understand, the posts which correct his delusions.  Then, like a kid who isn't getting enough respect and attention, he just becomes an aggravating little twerp.  Which is why he's had so many accounts banned.  

    At least he's talking Bruins this time, I'll give him that.  Not making any sense, but talking Bruins...it's progress.

    If you think you've seen this before, there were several 'marco...' accounts, winthecup, bruins8, stanjon, and a bunch of others I can't remember.  All the same poster.

     




    For the last time i do not have many accounts as u say - you are paranoid but if u keep gettin ppl suspended for no valid reason . i will bombard these boards with new posters.

     

    u wanna talk hockey any time go ahead. Not that iyt makes me richer knowing hockey anyway but whatever



    So let me get this straight.  You're threatening to "bombard" the board with a whole bunch of new accounts because you're not getting respect here??

    I don't think I've ever seen a more pitiful cry for attention here.  Is that supposed to be a threat?  Go for it.

    Or, even better...

    Get. A. Life.  

    I've been talking hockey.  Along with everyone else, I'm not trashing Gorton at all.  Just pointing out how foolish and incorrect your argument is about Chiarelli not being responsible for the Cup team.  

    Again, we can only show you the evidence, but we can't make you understand it any better than I can teach the alphabet to my dog.

    That's why we always get to this dead end with you.

     
  21. You have chosen to ignore posts from marco0863. Show marco0863's posts

    Re: Chiarelli gets 4 year extension

    In response to red75's comment:

     

    Who was the GM? Peter Chiarelli - fact. Hired on May 26, 2006.

    Who was Acting GM due to pre-existing contractual obligations? Gorton.

    Who had supervised meetings with Bruins scouts and management to discuss how and who he wanted to draft, trade and sign prior to the end of his contractual obligations? Peter Chiarelli.

    Those are all facts, that you seem to willfully ignore.

     



    ok Red you are saying that Chia drafted all those players in 2006 and that Rask was a trade done by Chia.

     

    if this is indeed what  ur saying. history has just been re written!

    Look research it and get back to me show me clearly that PC drafted those players. 

    also as much as i liked savard he was not part of the cup championship so we can also exclude him ( make it easier)

     
  22. You have chosen to ignore posts from red75. Show red75's posts

    Re: Chiarelli gets 4 year extension

    In response to Fletcher1's comment:

     

     

    So let me get this straight.  You're threatening to "bombard" the board with a whole bunch of new accounts because you're not getting respect here??

     

    I don't think I've ever seen a more pitiful cry for attention here.  Is that supposed to be a threat?  Go for it.

    Or, even better...

    Get. A. Life.  

    I've been talking hockey.  Along with everyone else, I'm not trashing Gorton at all.  Just pointing out how foolish and incorrect your argument is about Chiarelli not being responsible for the Cup team.  

    Again, we can only show you the evidence, but we can't make you understand it any better than I can teach the alphabet to my dog.

    That's why we always get to this dead end with you.

     


     



    You'd have better luck with the dog - you could actually teach him the alphabet.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kg89Wz-9Fss

     
  23. You have chosen to ignore posts from asmaha. Show asmaha's posts

    Re: Chiarelli gets 4 year extension

    I'm out. Everyone else should be, too. Go enjoy the sun....

     
  24. You have chosen to ignore posts from red75. Show red75's posts

    Re: Chiarelli gets 4 year extension

    Savard's name is on the Cup, whether he played in the finals or not.

    Why the heck am I even bothering?

     
  25. You have chosen to ignore posts from marco0863. Show marco0863's posts

    Re: Chiarelli gets 4 year extension

    In response to Fletcher1's comment:

    In response to marco0863's comment:

     

    In response to Fletcher1's comment:

     

     

     

    Yeah guys, this is every argument with marco.  He's clearly losing the argument and everyone knows it, but he'll never admit it.  He either doesn't read, or doesn't understand, the posts which correct his delusions.  Then, like a kid who isn't getting enough respect and attention, he just becomes an aggravating little twerp.  Which is why he's had so many accounts banned.  

    At least he's talking Bruins this time, I'll give him that.  Not making any sense, but talking Bruins...it's progress.

    If you think you've seen this before, there were several 'marco...' accounts, winthecup, bruins8, stanjon, and a bunch of others I can't remember.  All the same poster.

     

     




    For the last time i do not have many accounts as u say - you are paranoid but if u keep gettin ppl suspended for no valid reason . i will bombard these boards with new posters.

     

     

    u wanna talk hockey any time go ahead. Not that iyt makes me richer knowing hockey anyway but whatever

     



    So let me get this straight.  You're threatening to "bombard" the board with a whole bunch of new accounts because you're not getting respect here??

     

    I don't think I've ever seen a more pitiful cry for attention here.  Is that supposed to be a threat?  Go for it.

    Or, even better...

    Get. A. Life.  

    I've been talking hockey.  Along with everyone else, I'm not trashing Gorton at all.  Just pointing out how foolish and incorrect your argument is about Chiarelli not being responsible for the Cup team.  

    Again, we can only show you the evidence, but we can't make you understand it any better than I can teach the alphabet to my dog.

    That's why we always get to this dead end with you.



    Fletch u have almost 6000 posts and i have to get a life.

    Respect? once again your not being very smart- idc about the respect if i did i would just well do what everyone here does is agree with each other so they can get respect.

    U wanna talk hockey with me - like i said go ahead. 

    Once again you are calling me foolish and blah blah- read my posts- I said Chiarelli has done an admirable job. i said he has made great trades but the nucleus was already mostly there now Fletch if u watcg the bruins you would know that It is not me inventing this . It is a fact that this team was set for stardom but Pc fine tuned it but to say he built it alone- NO

    that is wrong

    If i am not mistaken and i am not searching this - a similar situation happened in chi only they had a few number 1 picks to help. Dale tallon had pretty much built a strong nucleus and Bowman then took over.

    Now, look at the league now teams that i see building a strong nucleua is Edmonton , Colorado, chicago still young and so are the bruins, Islanders too but nucleus not strong enough .

    The oilers are building a very strong team and unless they break the team up. the cup is not that far away for them 

     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share