Defensive zone coverage disgusting

  1. This post has been removed.

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from hangnail. Show hangnail's posts

    Re: Defensive zone coverage disgusting

    What are you doing here, they won tonight

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from Not-A-Shot. Show Not-A-Shot's posts

    Re: Defensive zone coverage disgusting

    In response to mitchco98's comment:

    Ugly game tonight from our back end, no lead is safe with this bunch. Difficulty cycling the puck outlet passes were horrific, you had 2 Dmen (won't mention their names) in the corner for Jersey's 4th goal. CJ and management better be concerned heading into the playoffs.




    A 5-3 lead was safe.

     

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from BsLegion. Show BsLegion's posts

    Re: Defensive zone coverage disgusting

    Devils 4th goal was all on Thornton. Could have costed the game.

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from SoxFanInIL. Show SoxFanInIL's posts

    Re: Defensive zone coverage disgusting

    In response to Not-A-Shot's comment:

    In response to mitchco98's comment:

     

    Ugly game tonight from our back end, no lead is safe with this bunch. Difficulty cycling the puck outlet passes were horrific, you had 2 Dmen (won't mention their names) in the corner for Jersey's 4th goal. CJ and management better be concerned heading into the playoffs.

     




    A 5-3 lead was safe.

     

     




    What? A 9-3 lead isnt safe with this team.

    PS- Im not ragging on them any more- but the fact is, its true.

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from Bruinfaninnewjersey. Show Bruinfaninnewjersey's posts

    Re: Defensive zone coverage disgusting

    In response to BsLegion's comment:

    Devils 4th goal was all on Thornton. Could have costed the game.




    Third goal was a Looch turnover. THAT could have cost the game too. It is what it is.

     
  7. This post has been removed.

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from Not-A-Shot. Show Not-A-Shot's posts

    Re: Defensive zone coverage disgusting

    In response to SoxFanInIL's comment:



    What? A 9-3 lead isnt safe with this team.

     

    PS- Im not ragging on them any more- but the fact is, its true.



    They've won five of six.  Were any of those leads safe?

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from dezaruchi. Show dezaruchi's posts

    Re: Defensive zone coverage disgusting

    In response to Bruinfaninnewjersey's comment:

     

    In response to BsLegion's comment:

     

    Devils 4th goal was all on Thornton. Could have costed the game.

     




    Third goal was a Looch turnover. THAT could have cost the game too. It is what it is.

     

     




    Boychuk was the worse mistake on that play. He was last man back and decided to jump up into the play after Lucic turned it over. No open lane to the net for Zajac if J-Boy holds his position.

     

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from SanDogBrewin. Show SanDogBrewin's posts

    Re: Defensive zone coverage disgusting

    Oh how nice...SoxFan trolling with mitch.

    Shocker

     

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from RichHillOntario. Show RichHillOntario's posts

    Re: Defensive zone coverage disgusting

    I'd be more concerned if they weren't scoring to get the leads.

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from BsLegion. Show BsLegion's posts

    Re: Defensive zone coverage disgusting

    In response to dezaruchi's comment:

     

    Boychuk was the worse mistake on that play. He was last man back and decided to jump up into the play after Lucic turned it over. No open lane to the net for Zajac if J-Boy holds his position.

     




    I was going to comment something similar.  Lucic has been a clutz with the puck but Boychuk went for the puck taking off Lucic , they both left the puck and Zajac stole it.

     
  13. This post has been removed.

     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from BsLegion. Show BsLegion's posts

    Re: Defensive zone coverage disgusting

    In response to SanDogBrewin's comment:

    Oh how nice...SoxFan trolling with mitch.

    Shocker

     



    wait soon ipot wil come in and bring up the loss to the Habs last month and compare it to Vancouver loss last season

     
  15. This post has been removed.

     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from hangnail. Show hangnail's posts

    Re: Defensive zone coverage disgusting

    In response to mitchco98's comment:

    In response to hangnail's comment:

     

    What are you doing here, they won tonight

     

     

    NJ is the 2nd worst scoring team in the league and they score 4 goals very distrubing to watch. Boston's last 4 games 3 games were they have given up 40 shots or more. Not typical Bruin Hockey.

     Another great post by a Habs fan.  What else ya got?

     

     
  17. You have chosen to ignore posts from hangnail. Show hangnail's posts

    Re: Defensive zone coverage disgusting

    In response to BsLegion's comment:

    Devils 4th goal was all on Thornton. Could have costed the game.


     I'll go 50/50 with you San, Khudo saw it all the way and it still beat him.  IMO he should have had that one but yea, Thornton was late on coverage.

     
  18. This post has been removed.

     
  19. You have chosen to ignore posts from hangnail. Show hangnail's posts

    Re: Defensive zone coverage disgusting

    In response to mitchco98's comment:

    In response to hangnail's comment:

     

    In response to mitchco98's comment:

     

    In response to hangnail's comment:

     

    What are you doing here, they won tonight

     

     

    NJ is the 2nd worst scoring team in the league and they score 4 goals very distrubing to watch. Boston's last 4 games 3 games were they have given up 40 shots or more. Not typical Bruin Hockey.

     

     

     Another great post by a Habs fan.  What else ya got?

     

     




    OK Lou you the man. I mean idiot.

     




    Weak

     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from Bookboy007. Show Bookboy007's posts

    Re: Defensive zone coverage disgusting

    In response to RichHillOntario's comment:

    I'd be more concerned if they weren't scoring to get the leads.




    BINGO!

     
  21. You have chosen to ignore posts from Not-A-Shot. Show Not-A-Shot's posts

    Re: Defensive zone coverage disgusting

    In response to mitchco98's comment:



    The new over under for shots against is 40 moving forward.

     



    Bruins goaltenders stop 92.9% of all shots on average.  On 40 shots, 2.84 will get through.  The B's score 2.89 goals per game on average.

    So the Bruins will win every game.

    Woo!  (woo!)

     
  22. You have chosen to ignore posts from RichHillOntario. Show RichHillOntario's posts

    Re: Defensive zone coverage disgusting

    In response to mitchco98's comment:

    In response to RichHillOntario's comment:

     

    I'd be more concerned if they weren't scoring to get the leads.

     



    Not too many night this team scores 5 with 2 shorties very fortunate tonight, almost let this game get away from them.

     



    True but I'm thinking the play in their own end can improve.  If they weren't scoring there wouldn't be any leads to jeopardize. 

     
  23. You have chosen to ignore posts from RichHillOntario. Show RichHillOntario's posts

    Re: Defensive zone coverage disgusting

    In response to Bookboy007's comment:

    In response to RichHillOntario's comment:

     

    I'd be more concerned if they weren't scoring to get the leads.

     




    BINGO!

     



    They can't fritter away leads they don't have, Book.

     
  24. You have chosen to ignore posts from goodnewsbears. Show goodnewsbears's posts

    Re: Defensive zone coverage disgusting

    The same idiots who are complaining about a 5-4 win will complain about a 1-0 win.  Bruins D sucks.  Bruins can't score.

     
  25. You have chosen to ignore posts from Bookboy007. Show Bookboy007's posts

    Re: Defensive zone coverage disgusting

    All they do is win games.  They're brutal.

     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share