Game 48: Boston at Chicago

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from mattbs. Show mattbs's posts

    Re: Game 48: Boston at Chicago

    In response to BsLegion's comment:

    C'mon !  what a dumb penalty call on Toews .



    They had to call it.  Its in the rules.

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from BsLegion. Show BsLegion's posts

    Re: Game 48: Boston at Chicago

    In response to zamboni24's comment:

    Toews -- nice blank look back at the refs -- try reading the rulebook -- it's a penalty




    he didn't do it on purpose, dumb rule, dum penalty.

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from Bruinfaninnewjersey. Show Bruinfaninnewjersey's posts

    Re: Game 48: Boston at Chicago

    Marchand seems to be involved in EVERY good play today... amazing!

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from Bookboy007. Show Bookboy007's posts

    Re: Game 48: Boston at Chicago

    In response to BsLegion's comment:

    In response to Bookboy007's comment:

    In response to BsLegion's comment:

    Bookboy figured out what the Bruins were missing besides a little luck and those bounces ?



    You were saying?

     

    ??? I'm bringing back the discussion from the the Leafs game thread.

    Yeah, when it was 1-0 Hawks.  It's 2-1 Bruins.  What are they missing other than the bounces between two very evenly matched, very good teams?  Playing the class of the league and the game couldn't be more even. 

     

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from BsLegion. Show BsLegion's posts

    Re: Game 48: Boston at Chicago

    In response to mattbs' comment:

    In response to BsLegion's comment:

    C'mon !  what a dumb penalty call on Toews .



    They had to call it.  Its in the rules.




    not a PP though

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from Bruinfaninnewjersey. Show Bruinfaninnewjersey's posts

    Re: Game 48: Boston at Chicago

    In response to mattbs' comment:

    In response to BsLegion's comment:

    C'mon !  what a dumb penalty call on Toews .



    They had to call it.  Its in the rules.



    Yeah... cause the refs always get it right

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from BsLegion. Show BsLegion's posts

    Re: Game 48: Boston at Chicago

    Spooner playing ?

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from dezaruchi. Show dezaruchi's posts

    Re: Game 48: Boston at Chicago

    In response to BsLegion's comment:

     

    C'mon !  what a dumb penalty call on Toews .

     




    Very dumb play on his part. You don't toss a piece of lumber in the air with other people around. Imagine if a player or fan got hit in the eye with that. Broken sticks should be dropped to the ice.

     

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from SanDogBrewin. Show SanDogBrewin's posts

    Re: Game 48: Boston at Chicago

    In response to BsLegion's comment:

    Toews -- nice blank look back at the refs -- try reading the rulebook -- it's a penalty




    he didn't do it on purpose, dumb rule, dum penalty.


    It's not the Olympics just yet go get your Bruins jersey on please.

 
  • You have chosen to ignore posts from NeelyOrrBourque. Show NeelyOrrBourque's posts

    Re: Game 48: Boston at Chicago

    In response to BsLegion's comment:

    Crawford doesn't have those extra large pads from last season I see



    Rask is one of the few in the league who didn't have to make any adjustments. When you look at the goalie stats from last year. There's only ONE goalie who's among the leaders in all categories that is the same. He plays on the Bruins. But, since were on equipment..Pavlac of the Jets I noticed he changed his pads recently. Did some digging & found out they're 5 lbs lighter. The Jets have been winning with him the net.

     
  • You have chosen to ignore posts from dezaruchi. Show dezaruchi's posts

    Re: Game 48: Boston at Chicago

    In response to BsLegion's comment:

    Spooner playing ?




    Not particularly well today.

     
  • You have chosen to ignore posts from RichHillOntario. Show RichHillOntario's posts

    Re: Game 48: Boston at Chicago

    In response to dezaruchi's comment:

    In response to BsLegion's comment:

     

    C'mon !  what a dumb penalty call on Toews .

     




    Very dumb play on his part. You don't toss a piece of lumber in the air with other people around. Imagine if a player or fan got hit in the eye with that. Broken sticks should be dropped to the ice.

     



    Sundin was suspended for a game back in 2004 for doing it.

     
  • You have chosen to ignore posts from NeelyOrrBourque. Show NeelyOrrBourque's posts

    Re: Game 48: Boston at Chicago

    In response to dezaruchi's comment:

    In response to BsLegion's comment:

     

    C'mon !  what a dumb penalty call on Toews .

     




    Very dumb play on his part. You don't toss a piece of lumber in the air with other people around. Imagine if a player or fan got hit in the eye with that. Broken sticks should be dropped to the ice.

     



    Exactly Dez! Imagine how Toews would feel if he hit some 4 yr old in the face with it.

     
  • You have chosen to ignore posts from mattbs. Show mattbs's posts

    Re: Game 48: Boston at Chicago

    Come on RASK!!!

     
  • You have chosen to ignore posts from Sobchack. Show Sobchack's posts

    Re: Game 48: Boston at Chicago

    Rask on sleep mode.   

     
  • You have chosen to ignore posts from zamboni24. Show zamboni24's posts

    Re: Game 48: Boston at Chicago

    What is with Rask lately -letteng in these stinkers

     
  • You have chosen to ignore posts from NeelyOrrBourque. Show NeelyOrrBourque's posts

    Re: Game 48: Boston at Chicago

    OH Tuukka, Tuukka.......Tuukka! 

     
  • You have chosen to ignore posts from Bruinfaninnewjersey. Show Bruinfaninnewjersey's posts

    Re: Game 48: Boston at Chicago

    What the heck Rask?

     
  • You have chosen to ignore posts from perrysound. Show perrysound's posts

    Re: Game 48: Boston at Chicago

    horrible goal

     

     
  • You have chosen to ignore posts from BsLegion. Show BsLegion's posts

    Re: Game 48: Boston at Chicago

    In response to Bookboy007's comment:

    In response to BsLegion's comment:

    In response to Bookboy007's comment:

    In response to BsLegion's comment:

    Bookboy figured out what the Bruins were missing besides a little luck and those bounces ?



    You were saying?

     

    ??? I'm bringing back the discussion from the the Leafs game thread.

    Yeah, when it was 1-0 Hawks.  It's 2-1 Bruins.  What are they missing other than the bounces between two very evenly matched, very good teams?  Playing the class of the league and the game couldn't be more even. 

     




    LOL you're talking about regular season game, I'm talking about last playoffs against the Hawks.  You say it was because of some bad bounces and luck.  I said they were missing something.  Who ever wins today does not answer that. 

    I still say they're missing something to win it all, if they win with this exact team (not including Seidenberg'S replacment) I will buy you a steak dinner .

     
  • You have chosen to ignore posts from mxt. Show mxt's posts

    Re: Game 48: Boston at Chicago

    Wake up Rask. No excuse for that

     
  • You have chosen to ignore posts from BsLegion. Show BsLegion's posts

    Re: Game 48: Boston at Chicago

    In response to NeelyOrrBourque's comment:

    In response to dezaruchi's comment:

    In response to BsLegion's comment:

     

    C'mon !  what a dumb penalty call on Toews .

     




    Very dumb play on his part. You don't toss a piece of lumber in the air with other people around. Imagine if a player or fan got hit in the eye with that. Broken sticks should be dropped to the ice.

     



    Exactly Dez! Imagine how Toews would feel if he hit some 4 yr old in the face with it.




    point is he didn;'t do it on purpose.

     
  • You have chosen to ignore posts from NeelyOrrBourque. Show NeelyOrrBourque's posts

    Re: Game 48: Boston at Chicago

    Lucic is gonna score today!

     
  • You have chosen to ignore posts from SanDogBrewin. Show SanDogBrewin's posts

    Re: Game 48: Boston at Chicago

    Bruins won't get out of the 2nd round without a Seidenberg replacement.

     
  • You have chosen to ignore posts from BsLegion. Show BsLegion's posts

    Re: Game 48: Boston at Chicago

    In response to Bookboy007's comment:

    In response to BsLegion's comment:

    In response to Bookboy007's comment:

    In response to BsLegion's comment:

    Bookboy figured out what the Bruins were missing besides a little luck and those bounces ?



    You were saying?

     

    ??? I'm bringing back the discussion from the the Leafs game thread.

    Yeah, when it was 1-0 Hawks.  It's 2-1 Bruins.  What are they missing other than the bounces between two very evenly matched, very good teams?  Playing the class of the league and the game couldn't be more even. 

     




    and it should have been 3-1 and now 2-2 .  I'll give you that the luck and bounces do keep going their way

     
  • Sections
    Shortcuts

    Share