Game 73: Hawks @ Bruins GDT

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from shuperman. Show shuperman's posts

    Re: Game 73: Hawks @ Bruins GDT

    In response to Fletcher1's comment:

    In response to shuperman's comment:

    In response to Fletcher1's comment:

    shupe, seriously , you've done nothing for two days but run down Bruins for anything and everything and your excitment over losing to Montreal has been off the charts.  If you respect and enjoy Subban, Emelin, Crawford, etc. so much more than anyone on Boston, by all means...

    ...I know, I know, you're just so delightfully objective that you only whine about Bruin players...yawn...time for a new routine...?



    Hey Fletch.  when was i delightful about losing to the habs.  Tell me when?   Tell me when i brought up crawford.  Tell me when?   My routine.  Lets recap. 

    1.   Yemelin hit was clean.  Lucic looks like a baby.  Um. I didnt even make that thread

    2.   Lucic feet didnt leave the ice on his hit on Yemelin.  No one sees this but me. 

    3.   I brought up the crawford issue on this thread.  All me.  Yup. That was all me.  This was in fun.  Thats what i had with it.  

    Why are you trying to tell me what to think on a play.  there were plenty of others that agreed that it was a fine hit.  Yet you use my name in your reply to it.  

    give it a rest.  



    shupe, 90% of your posts are whining about the Bruins dirty tactics or worshiping guys like Crawford (you're still celebrating his Stanley Cup -- read your posts^).  

    Sometimes your comparisons of 'our own backyard' are intersting when everyone is remarking about how saintly the Bruins are and complaining about other teams being dirty.  You're good at that.  But you just never stop...

    I already said Emelin's hit wasn't illegal.  As a Bruins fan though, I'm not celebrating it endlessly or whining about Lucic throwing some hard checks afterwards.  



    No. 90percent arent.  I also started an oiler thread.  100% sure this is a made up fletch stat.  

    i commented on the thread about yemelin and lucic like a bunch of others.  I think it was a great hit.  You dont.  Well guess what.  Idgaf what you think.  Crawfords name was brought up in fun.  I had fun with it.  The lucic hit that he left his feet was brought into the game when i said yemelin has taken some hard hits and keeps coming back.  

    i have one bruins tshirt.  Its lucic.  I love him.  but he looked like a punk.  Get up skate away and get him another time.  Ive been consistant with this.  

    If celebrating is giving an opinion im guilty.  

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from adkbeesfan. Show adkbeesfan's posts

    Re: Game 73: Hawks @ Bruins GDT

    In response to shuperman's comment:

    In response to adkbeesfan's comment:

    shupe IS the lone gunman... despite the entire hockey world's opinion that tuukka deserved a top flight goalie contract and  is a vezina front-runner the year after getting that contract.... shupe knows best. at some point shupe it's not everyone else that is misguided, it's you. i swear people on this site feel they have to defend to the death everything they've ever said here. even if it was just said in passing, of the cuff. btw your nap clause would hold some weight if he was being relieved by a bum who had trouble winning games. that's not the case. the bruins paid tuukka top $$ because they believed he is the best goalie in the league. well, this year he should win the award for the best goalie in the league. at this point you're just arguing with yourself. we're laughing.     



    For the record i hate both contracts. Just like i hate all goalie contracts.  For the record i said tukka deserves vezina.  But yeah lets omit those facts.  



    then pay equal time bashing all goalies on THIS site. if not, your just "trollin'". when you go trollin' this is the response you get. 

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from BsLegion. Show BsLegion's posts

    Re: Game 73: Hawks @ Bruins GDT

    In response to adkbeesfan's comment:

    shupe IS the lone gunman... despite the entire hockey world's opinion that tuukka deserved a top flight goalie contract and  is a vezina front-runner the year after getting that contract.... shupe knows best. at some point shupe it's not everyone else that is misguided, it's you. i swear people on this site feel they have to defend to the death everything they've ever said here. even if it was just said in passing, of the cuff. btw your nap clause would hold some weight if he was being relieved by a bum who had trouble winning games. that's not the case. the bruins paid tuukka top $$ because they believed he is the best goalie in the league. well, this year he should win the award for the best goalie in the league. at this point you're just arguing with yourself. we're laughing.     




    Oh my...... now you've done it LOL

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from SanDogBrewin. Show SanDogBrewin's posts

    Re: Game 73: Hawks @ Bruins GDT

    This GDT is on it's 2nd page already and the games just under 5 hours away

    Love this place!

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from shuperman. Show shuperman's posts

    Re: Game 73: Hawks @ Bruins GDT

    In response to NeelyOrrBourque's comment:

    In response to shuperman's comment:

    In response to NeelyOrrBourque's comment:

    In response to Fletcher1's comment:

    shupe, seriously , you've done nothing for two days but run down Bruins for anything and everything and your excitment over losing to Montreal has been off the charts.  If you respect and enjoy Subban, Emelin, Crawford, etc. so much more than anyone on Boston, by all means...

    ...I know, I know, you're just so delightfully objective that you only whine about Bruin players...yawn...time for a new routine...?



    I concur! It's getting over the top. Objectivity is one thing, but if I was a new poster I would think that shupe was either a habs fan, or a Cory Crawford dink stroker! 



    You started the lucic thread you moron.  



    I know I did! But I also don't bash the Bruins on a continuous basis! I think the Emelin hit was clean, I think Rask is 5x the goalie Crawford is. I think the Lucic' hit on Emelin & Weaver were clean. I don't think Lucic shouldn't be whining about something that happened almost 24 hrs after the fact!  



    What bruins.  I bash a contract and the same bruin you bashed.  The crawford thing was a debate that you guys always bring up.  you think hes 5x better.  I dont.   fletch says hes borderline avg.  i say hes not.  Not based on what his short career has shown.  Lucic hit on weaver was fine.  i was talking about the jump hit which was brought. Into the debate of questionable hits.  

    But guess what.  I really dont give a ratsass what you think.  You created the thread and try and walk away clean.   Heres a tip. Maybe you can jump on fletch's white horse on your way outta town.  

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from asmaha. Show asmaha's posts

    Re: Game 73: Hawks @ Bruins GDT

    Sigh. Well, this is my cue to avoid the GDT today. Oh well. Now back to those #AskNeal tweets....

     
  7. This post has been removed.

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from stan17. Show stan17's posts

    Re: Game 73: Hawks @ Bruins GDT


    Stinks that I'll miss tonight's gm but my son has a H.S. baseball gm.   

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from shuperman. Show shuperman's posts

    Re: Game 73: Hawks @ Bruins GDT

    In response to adkbeesfan's comment:

    In response to shuperman's comment:

    In response to adkbeesfan's comment:

    shupe IS the lone gunman... despite the entire hockey world's opinion that tuukka deserved a top flight goalie contract and  is a vezina front-runner the year after getting that contract.... shupe knows best. at some point shupe it's not everyone else that is misguided, it's you. i swear people on this site feel they have to defend to the death everything they've ever said here. even if it was just said in passing, of the cuff. btw your nap clause would hold some weight if he was being relieved by a bum who had trouble winning games. that's not the case. the bruins paid tuukka top $$ because they believed he is the best goalie in the league. well, this year he should win the award for the best goalie in the league. at this point you're just arguing with yourself. we're laughing.     



    For the record i hate both contracts. Just like i hate all goalie contracts.  For the record i said tukka deserves vezina.  But yeah lets omit those facts.  



    then pay equal time bashing all goalies on THIS site. if not, your just "trollin'". when you go trollin' this is the response you get. 



    Its been beaten to death adk.  I let it go.  Some people dont.  If you see me commenting on rask or crawford im 96% percent sure i didnt bring it up.  I promised nas i would leave it be.  

    If you dont wanna play the carve game like i did with this rask-crawford joke dont get involved.  You can call me a troll all you want.  I had fun with it. I stepped on a few toes and once it didnt go their way im a troll. 

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from shuperman. Show shuperman's posts

    Re: Game 73: Hawks @ Bruins GDT

    In response to asmaha's comment:

    Sigh. Well, this is my cue to avoid the GDT today. Oh well. Now back to those #AskNeal tweets....



    Priceless eh.  I roared. 

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from shuperman. Show shuperman's posts

    Re: Game 73: Hawks @ Bruins GDT

    In response to SanDogBrewin's comment:

    This GDT is on it's 2nd page already and the games just under 5 hours away

    Love this place!



    Me to you pot stirring #asspirate

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from SanDogBrewin. Show SanDogBrewin's posts

    Re: Game 73: Hawks @ Bruins GDT

    In response to stan17's comment:


    Stinks that I'll miss tonight's gm but my son has a H.S. baseball gm.  




    I wish a fellow Bruins fans son to have a great baseball game tonight.

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from NeelyOrrBourque. Show NeelyOrrBourque's posts

    Re: Game 73: Hawks @ Bruins GDT

    In response to shuperman's comment:

    In response to NeelyOrrBourque's comment:

    In response to shuperman's comment:

    In response to NeelyOrrBourque's comment:

    In response to Fletcher1's comment:

    shupe, seriously , you've done nothing for two days but run down Bruins for anything and everything and your excitment over losing to Montreal has been off the charts.  If you respect and enjoy Subban, Emelin, Crawford, etc. so much more than anyone on Boston, by all means...

    ...I know, I know, you're just so delightfully objective that you only whine about Bruin players...yawn...time for a new routine...?



    I concur! It's getting over the top. Objectivity is one thing, but if I was a new poster I would think that shupe was either a habs fan, or a Cory Crawford dink stroker! 



    You started the lucic thread you moron.  



    I know I did! But I also don't bash the Bruins on a continuous basis! I think the Emelin hit was clean, I think Rask is 5x the goalie Crawford is. I think the Lucic' hit on Emelin & Weaver were clean. I don't think Lucic shouldn't be whining about something that happened almost 24 hrs after the fact!  



    What bruins.  I bash a contract and the same bruin you bashed.  The crawford thing was a debate that you guys always bring up.  you think hes 5x better.  I dont.   fletch says hes borderline avg.  i say hes not.  Not based on what his short career has shown.  Lucic hit on weaver was fine.  i was talking about the jump hit which was brought. Into the debate of questionable hits.  

    But guess what.  I really dont give a ratsass what you think.  You created the thread and try and walk away clean.   Heres a tip. Maybe you can jump on fletch's white horse on your way outta town.  


    Yes I created the thread. I'm not walking away from anything. Do me a favor? Reach behind where your butt is. Get a good hold on the crack of your pants and un-twist the panties. 

     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from Fletcher1. Show Fletcher1's posts

    Re: Game 73: Hawks @ Bruins GDT

    In response to shuperman's comment:

     


    No. 90percent arent.  I also started an oiler thread.  100% sure this is a made up fletch stat.  

    i commented on the thread about yemelin and lucic like a bunch of others.  I think it was a great hit.  You dont.  Well guess what.  Idgaf what you think.  Crawfords name was brought up in fun.  I had fun with it.  The lucic hit that he left his feet was brought into the game when i said yemelin has taken some hard hits and keeps coming back.  

    i have one bruins tshirt.  Its lucic.  I love him.  but he looked like a punk.  Get up skate away and get him another time.  Ive been consistant with this.  

    If celebrating is giving an opinion im guilty.  



    I'm fine with all of the Emelin debate, well except all the whining about his metal plate.

    If you don't like the Lucic on Weaver hit, it is hard to believe you're much of a Lucic fan.  That's his bread and butter.  He has to punish people there.  Clean hit too.  He's not gonna play like Sidney Crosby shupe.

    But, of course I believe you, if you say so.  

    You'd be bored if I came here and said, "gee shupe, that's a swell point." anyhow.

    I find your Hab apologies and ball-washing tiresome, that's all.  And you do seem extra excited here after a big Bruins loss or a 'dirty' Bruin play.  That's when you get the most excited and post the most.

    There will be no pot-stirer immunity for you, you know. 

     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from SanDogBrewin. Show SanDogBrewin's posts

    Re: Game 73: Hawks @ Bruins GDT

    In response to shuperman's comment:

    This GDT is on it's 2nd page already and the games just under 5 hours away

    Love this place!



    Me to you pot stirring #asspirate



    #Youputwordsinmymouth

    #whydoeseveryonepickonme

 
  • You have chosen to ignore posts from socca10. Show socca10's posts

    Re: Game 73: Hawks @ Bruins GDT

    On a related subject, looking forward to this game a lot. I hope the B's rinse the bad taste out of their mouths from Monday with a solid 60 minutes of hard work and sweet team play. No need to worry about floppers tonight.

     
  • You have chosen to ignore posts from stan17. Show stan17's posts

    Re: Game 73: Hawks @ Bruins GDT

    In response to SanDogBrewin's comment:

    In response to stan17's comment:


    Stinks that I'll miss tonight's gm but my son has a H.S. baseball gm.  




    I wish a fellow Bruins fans son to have a great baseball game tonight.



    Thx San, last away gm he had went well.  He went 2-3 and crushed a double off the left-field wall, I then got home in time to watch the B's beat the Colorado.  It was a very good night. 

    I'll be watching the updates on the board here tonight.

     
  • You have chosen to ignore posts from shuperman. Show shuperman's posts

    Re: Game 73: Hawks @ Bruins GDT

    In response to Fletcher1's comment:

    In response to shuperman's comment:

     


    No. 90percent arent.  I also started an oiler thread.  100% sure this is a made up fletch stat.  

    i commented on the thread about yemelin and lucic like a bunch of others.  I think it was a great hit.  You dont.  Well guess what.  Idgaf what you think.  Crawfords name was brought up in fun.  I had fun with it.  The lucic hit that he left his feet was brought into the game when i said yemelin has taken some hard hits and keeps coming back.  

    i have one bruins tshirt.  Its lucic.  I love him.  but he looked like a punk.  Get up skate away and get him another time.  Ive been consistant with this.  

    If celebrating is giving an opinion im guilty.  



    I'm fine with all of the Emelin debate, well except all the whining about his metal plate.

    If you don't like the Lucic on Weaver hit, it is hard to believe you're much of a Lucic fan.  That's his bread and butter.  He has to punish people there.  Clean hit too.  He's not gonna play like Sidney Crosby shupe.

    But, of course I believe you, if you say so.  

    You'd be bored if I came here and said, "gee shupe, that's a swell point." anyhow.

    I find your Hab apologies and ball-washing tiresome, that's all.  And you do seem extra excited here after a big Bruins loss or a 'dirty' Bruin play.  That's when you get the most excited and post the most.

    There will be no pot-stirer immunity for you, you know. 



    Man you and San are slow.  I clearly indicated it was the hit on Yemelin.  I never mentioned the Weaver hit.  It was brought into it as the war of the two players rages on.  Which i think is great.  No issue with how yemelin plays.   

    how do you rate extra excited on a blog?   This isnt porn.  Im giving an opinion that the hit was clean.  YOU brought me into your reply.  Not once did i bring fletch into mine. 

    habs apology.  Here we go.  Now im the best troll ever.  Yep.  Heard that from you before.  I defended a hit many others did.  Bottom line. 

    Todays rask crawford rant i took in fun.   

    neither did i start.  But you get your kicks however you want.  I dont really care.  

     

     
  • You have chosen to ignore posts from Beezfan4life. Show Beezfan4life's posts

    Re: Game 73: Hawks @ Bruins GDT

    In response to shuperman's comment:

    In response to SanDogBrewin's comment:

     

    Hope Crawford is net tonight.

     



    Im sure hes yawning.  He owns rask. Stanley Cup.  Check.  Win this year against Rask.  Check.  

     



    Not as good as Rask....check mate . P.S bill ranford won a cup , would you say he's in Rasks league . Be honest with yourself here .

     
  • You have chosen to ignore posts from watchtower. Show watchtower's posts

    Re: Game 73: Hawks @ Bruins GDT

    In response to SanDogBrewin's comment:

    This GDT is on it's 2nd page already and the games just under 5 hours away

    Love this place!




    and not one post about the game

     
  • You have chosen to ignore posts from NBbruinsfan. Show NBbruinsfan's posts

    Re: Game 73: Hawks @ Bruins GDT

    Chicago Blackhawks - Offensive Power house

    Crawford   Vs.  Rask - Crawford says: "We're all ready for this one."

    Corey Crawford (29-13-10, 2.20 GAA, .919 save %, 2 SO)

    Tuukka Rask       (32-14-5, 2.05 GAA, .930 save %, 6 SO)

    Keith   vs.  Chara

    Toews   vs.  Bergeron

    Hossa   vs.  Iginla

    Oduya  Vs.   OH DOOO YAA ……. Let’s get it on. GO Bruins

     
  • You have chosen to ignore posts from BsLegion. Show BsLegion's posts

    Re: Game 73: Hawks @ Bruins GDT

    So what if SHupe is a Habs fan , he would be very welcomed here as being the best Hab fan on BDC.

    As for the Crawford - Rask debate I don't think it can be determined whom is the better of the 2 .  It's easy to say Crawford because of the SCF last year.  Although I would like to add the year the Bruins won the cup Crawford brought the Canucks to a game7, if it were n't for him Chicago would have lost in 5.  That's when I noticed how good he was. Then it seemed like he regressed from there and in the final I thought he might have been a little lucky but with his play this year I think it's because he very good .  You know what they say; You have to be good to be lucky.

    Too bad Kane is not there, if Bruins win it won't be as satisfying.

     

     

     
  • You have chosen to ignore posts from shuperman. Show shuperman's posts

    Re: Game 73: Hawks @ Bruins GDT

    In response to Beezfan4life's comment:

    In response to shuperman's comment:

    In response to SanDogBrewin's comment:

     

    Hope Crawford is net tonight.

     



    Im sure hes yawning.  He owns rask. Stanley Cup.  Check.  Win this year against Rask.  Check.  

     



    Not as good as Rask....check mate . P.S bill ranford won a cup , would you say he's in Rasks league . Be honest with yourself here .



    Osgood won multiple cups.  Likely gets considered for hof.  I dont think hes as good.  But its hard to compare generations.  At the time ranford was awesome.  

    I think if we dig into the old posts i put rask in the top 5.  Crawford in the top 7 range.  I have rask as the best goalie this year and likely should win vezina.  Im not sure what else i can add to that.  I defend crawford more so then rip rask.  I think both are elite goalies.  any goalie in the league would give up their last 2 yrs for crawfords yet some thing hes just avg.  had he not been injured he would be in the final 3 as he would have ran away with wins.  But its been a typical bizarro year for goalies. 

    very glad we have rask.  Hate his contract.  Rinne, king H smith etc etc.  i hate goalie contracts bc i sure as heck wouldnt want to insure them.  I think goalies are a product of their location.  CJ is putting up awesome numbers as is Crawfords caddy.  Griese is in for smith lets see how he does.  

    there is a strong goalie union in here.  I dont place their value higher then a stellar dman.  

     

     
  • You have chosen to ignore posts from NeelyOrrBourque. Show NeelyOrrBourque's posts

    Re: Game 73: Hawks @ Bruins GDT

    In response to Beezfan4life's comment:

    In response to shuperman's comment:

    In response to SanDogBrewin's comment:

     

    Hope Crawford is net tonight.

     



    Im sure hes yawning.  He owns rask. Stanley Cup.  Check.  Win this year against Rask.  Check.  

     



    Not as good as Rask....check mate . P.S bill ranford won a cup , would you say he's in Rasks league . Be honest with yourself here .



    You S.O.B. Bringing up that fawker lol. Different era, totally different styles. Radford was the last of the dying breed of reflex goaltenders. Rask as well as most NHL goalies are twice the athletes now. Not a fair comparison. I think Radford ended up being a lot like Cam Ward. He was a great goalie, but not among the greats. He rode the Conn Smythe and Canada Cup MVP coat tails for the rest of his career. Still one of my favourites though. Nobody was as fast as him stacking the pads! 

     
  • You have chosen to ignore posts from shuperman. Show shuperman's posts

    Re: Game 73: Hawks @ Bruins GDT

    In response to BsLegion's comment:

    So what if SHupe is a Habs fan , he would be very welcomed here as being the best Hab fan on BDC.

    As for the Crawford - Rask debate I don't think it can be determined whom is the better of the 2 .  It's easy to say Crawford because of the SCF last year.  Although I would like to add the year the Bruins won the cup Crawford brought the Canucks to a game7, if it were n't for him Chicago would have lost in 5.  That's when I noticed how good he was. Then it seemed like he regressed from there and in the final I thought he might have been a little lucky but with his play this year I think it's because he very good .  You know what they say; You have to be good to be lucky.

    Too bad Kane is not there, if Bruins win it won't be as satisfying.

     

     



    i would be 100% more of a caps troll.  They are my 2nd favorite.  

     
  • Sections
    Shortcuts

    Share