Gregorys Daddys Starting Lineup

  1. This post has been removed.

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from kelvana33. Show kelvana33's posts

    Re: Gregorys Daddys Starting Lineup

    Which one called the biting penalty on Burrows?

    Which one called the penalty on the B's in Game 7 when Bergeron score the goal while Bobby 5-hole was on all fours before the puck got there?

    Most important, which one will you blame when your Canucks fail to make it out of the West?

    Suck it Null.
     
  3. This post has been removed.

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from Bisson1. Show Bisson1's posts

    Re: Gregorys Daddys Starting Lineup

    Dan O'Rourke doesn't even deserve to see ANY playoff time. Calls every single little infraction and creates a game of non stop special teams. Can't stand watching games that he's assigned to. Let 'em play.
     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from BSXIII. Show BSXIII's posts

    Re: Gregorys Daddys Starting Lineup

    Posts from null are hidden

    Good feature.  Always concise and to the point.
     
  6. This post has been removed.

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from Bisson1. Show Bisson1's posts

    Re: Gregorys Daddys Starting Lineup

    In Response to Re: Gregorys Daddys Starting Lineup:
    In Response to Re: Gregorys Daddys Starting Lineup : There a method to the NHLOA madness. When you have O'Rourke calling everything one game and O'Halloran calling nothing the next game, teams get confused on whats going to get called.  When consistency is intentionally erratic then the Refs can Make you or Break you Tried and true playoff formula since 1994
    Posted by null


    That's actually a good point, but the players do know who the linesmen are prior to games, and coaches do have them all scouted out. Still, some consitency between them would be nice. O'Rourke gets ridiculous at times.
     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from Wheatskins. Show Wheatskins's posts

    Re: Gregorys Daddys Starting Lineup

    Please folks, do not reply to any threads that this Nullness posts. It's the only way we will get rid of him. If he starts a post - let it die a quick death.

    I have a very sneaking feeling that this Null is the alter-ego of a regular poster here; he should have been gone a long time ago, but he keeps hanging around.
     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from schlich. Show schlich's posts

    Re: Gregorys Daddys Starting Lineup

    I like reading the posts null is involved with.  People get pissed and it's fun to read.
     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from Bookboy007. Show Bookboy007's posts

    Re: Gregorys Daddys Starting Lineup

    In Response to Re: Gregorys Daddys Starting Lineup:
    In Response to Re: Gregorys Daddys Starting Lineup : Answer to your questions, Dr. Yo Yo: When did Burrows get a biting penalty? Did you see any teeth marks? O’Halloran watched Bergy chop Keslers stick in half in the first period of Gm. 7 and then he told a sleazy lie that he thought Kesler broke his stick shooting the puck. Posted by null


    You keep coming back to this one play. One play in a 7 game series where your team got blown the f--- out in every game it lost.  These weren't close games where the wrong call at the right time would be the difference.  You should stick to mindlessly repeating your usual garbage and not try to justify it with details.

    And "did you see any teeth marks?" is a sleazy excuse if I've ever heard one.
     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from kegarret. Show kegarret's posts

    Re: Gregorys Daddys Starting Lineup

    In Response to Re: Gregorys Daddys Starting Lineup:
    In Response to Re: Gregorys Daddys Starting Lineup : There a method to the NHLOA madness. When you have O'Rourke calling everything one game and O'Halloran calling nothing the next game, teams get confused on whats going to get called.  When consistency is intentionally erratic then the Refs can Make you or Break you Tried and true playoff formula since 1994
    Posted by null


    So, you can figure out how each ref calls a game, but players and coaches cannot?  Gifted.  It's the same way with baseball.  Umpires have different strike zones.  Usually pitchers are aware how an ump will call a game.  Sometimes umps and refs will tell the benches what they are looking for, or what they aren't going to put up with or will call.  It's not trial and error.  Would you prefer robots?  That would not seem to favor your little bush league canuck team that dives and bits and hacks all game long and gets away with it.  I hear Atlanta's looking for a new franchise...I bet the Sedin girls would love the deep south.
     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from skater68. Show skater68's posts

    Re: Gregorys Daddys Starting Lineup

    You people need to go easy on null.

    You know his mom spanks him if he talks this trash at home. Let the little boy have his say
     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from kitchener. Show kitchener's posts

    Re: Gregorys Daddys Starting Lineup

    In Response to Re: Gregorys Daddys Starting Lineup:
    In Response to Re: Gregorys Daddys Starting Lineup : There a method to the NHLOA madness. When you have O'Rourke calling everything one game and O'Halloran calling nothing the next game, teams get confused on whats going to get called.  When consistency is intentionally erratic then the Refs can Make you or Break you Tried and true playoff formula since 1994
    Posted by null

     Life most really suck for you,alway's living in the past,get over it,why don't you stay on a Vancouver forum and cry with the rest of there fans.
     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from Wheatskins. Show Wheatskins's posts

    Re: Gregorys Daddys Starting Lineup

    In Response to Re: Gregorys Daddys Starting Lineup:
    I like reading the posts null is involved with.  People get pissed and it's fun to read.
    Posted by schlich


    You must lead a wonderful life that you can amuse yourself with something like that.
     
  15. This post has been removed.

     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from kelvana33. Show kelvana33's posts

    Re: Gregorys Daddys Starting Lineup

    In Response to Re: Gregorys Daddys Starting Lineup:
    In Response to Re: Gregorys Daddys Starting Lineup : Answer to your questions, Dr. Yo Yo: When did Burrows get a biting penalty? Did you see any teeth marks? O’Halloran watched Bergy chop Keslers stick in half in the first period of Gm. 7 and then he told a sleazy lie that he thought Kesler broke his stick shooting the puck. (note: integrity in the NHLOA doesn't exist) In order of sycophantic loyalty to Bettman/NBC for the infamous honor of fixin the outcome of a game. #1 MVR (most valuable ref) is O’Halloran -Tied for 2nd are Sutherland and Walkom and then in no particular order are O’Rourke, Walsh, Watson, Leggo, Rooney, Kozari and Devorski. I see senior ref Don Van Massenhoven didn’t make the cut, i’m guessing he took the bullet for letting the B’s get schooled by the Canucks on Jan 7th?
    Posted by null


    So Null answer this then. You have the officials/Gregory's daddy rigging the game, I'm sure its true, bettman wanted the ratings

    WHO PAID OFF




    LUONGO TO


    SUCK SO




    BAD?????????????
     
  17. This post has been removed.

     
  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from kelvana33. Show kelvana33's posts

    Re: Gregorys Daddys Starting Lineup

    In Response to Re: Gregorys Daddys Starting Lineup:
    In Response to Re: Gregorys Daddys Starting Lineup : Keg, your in the know, but when refs tell only (1) one bench how the game will be called, it tilts the ice and this tactic is just one of the league tools in fixin the outcome.  A couple examples: No penalties being called Gm 7 in Tampa was without doubt advantage B's. No calls on many, many obvious blatant penalties by the B's on the Canucks in Gm's 3 through to Gm 7. Bottom line, O'Halloran, Sutherland, Walkom and O'Rourke deserve to have their names engraved on the 2011 Tainted Cup.
    Posted by null


    Wheres the answer?







    WHO PAID OFF










     LUONGO






    TO SUCK












    SO BAD????????
     
  19. You have chosen to ignore posts from dezaruchi. Show dezaruchi's posts

    Re: Gregorys Daddys Starting Lineup

    In Response to Re: Gregorys Daddys Starting Lineup:
    In Response to Re: Gregorys Daddys Starting Lineup : Keg, your in the know, but when refs tell only (1) one bench how the game will be called, it tilts the ice and this tactic is just one of the league tools in fixin the outcome.  A couple examples: No penalties being called Gm 7 in Tampa was without doubt advantage B's. No calls on many, many obvious blatant penalties by the B's on the Canucks in Gm's 3 through to Gm 7. Bottom line, O'Halloran, Sutherland, Walkom and O'Rourke deserve to have their names engraved on the 2011 Tainted Cup.
    Posted by null

    T-Bay managed to score on the PP in only 2 games out of the 7 against Boston. The Bruins scored PP goals in 3 out of the 7 games. Once again, you've failed as miserably as the Canucks PP in the Finals. I mean really, the Canucks go 2 for 33 on the PP in the Finals and you're still crying about a lack of PP time. Crying about the Canucks lack of PP goals would at least make some sense. Oh well, it's funnier and more pathetic this way so you hit the double whammy.
     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from Karl-Hungus. Show Karl-Hungus's posts

    Re: Gregorys Daddys Starting Lineup

    No van massengill?
     
  21. You have chosen to ignore posts from lucdufour. Show lucdufour's posts

    Re: Gregorys Daddys Starting Lineup

    "I mean really, the Canucks go 2 for 33 on the PP in the Finals and you're still crying about a lack of PP time."

    If you really want to talk special teams, the Bruins scored 3 Shorthanded goals in the series versus the 2 Powerplay goals the Vancouver Cityburnerfucks scored.  

    Bottom line: it didn't matter if it was even strength, man-up, man-down, paying off Gregory's Daddy, getting paid by Null's Mommy, being in cahoots with the refs, pumping tires----THE BRUINS WERE BETTER THAN THE CANUCKS AT EVERYTHING except biting.

    ps.  Cam Neely and Glen Wesley say hello
     
  22. This post has been removed.

     
  23. You have chosen to ignore posts from Bisson1. Show Bisson1's posts

    Re: Gregorys Daddys Starting Lineup

    In Response to Re: Gregorys Daddys Starting Lineup:
    In Response to Re: Gregorys Daddys Starting Lineup : So Book, did you see any real proof that Bergy got bit, other then his whining to Gregorys Daddys Lackeys? And seeing your so good at stats, how about your lame excuse for the following...We all know how important the first goal is, and so does Gregorys Daddys Lackeys. So over 7 games, penalties called in the 1st period were: Vancouver - 43 minutes Boston - 16 minutes Explain this little anomaly, Einstein?
    Posted by null


    Aaron Rome and lack of dicipline.
     
  24. This post has been removed.

     
  25. You have chosen to ignore posts from Bookboy007. Show Bookboy007's posts

    Re: Gregorys Daddys Starting Lineup

    Your stat is beside the point.  Your team lost four games by a combined score of what?  136-2 or something?

    As for "real proof" - are you auditioning for CSI-Vancouver?  You want dental records, DNA?  Because I saw Bergeron react to sudden and unexpected pain in a facewash with Burrows, a player with a long history of dirty tactics.  Moreover, and this won't matter to you, but it will matter to anyone who doesn't want to imitate a deluded drunk who blames others for his failures, a player with a league-wide reputation for class who is likely to be a Lady Byng candidate this year said Burrows bit him in the pile-up.

    But again - this is beside the point.  Burrows didn't get suspended or penalized as you might expect if the league wide conspiracy was to "tilt the ice".  And frankly, I don't care that he didn't.  See my Chiarelli quote below.  But he did bite Bergeron and to say otherwise is just cognitive dissonance.

     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share