In response to boborielly224's comment:

iginla on the third line? shut up 

All this "trade Horton" talk makes the "replace Bourque" talk sound reasonable!!!

I'd like the Bruins to score a few more goals and maybe play the body a little more... but at 9-2-2, I'm willing to accept that PC and CJ know a little more than me.

 

Yeah really, that's almost as foolish as somebody questioning Rask's rebound control during a 3-2 win?

 

Nice to know I can make a comment that will bother you for days. You do realize it's possible to play below one's ability and still win, right?

 

In response to Bruinfaninnewjersey's comment:

The Bruins have already done it 6 or 7 times this year so yes, I'm aware. Pointing out the foolishness of your comment doesn't mean I'm at all bothered by it. It only means I'm bored and vindictive. I suppose you think Rask should've got a shutout then?

The gift that keeps on giving. Good call genius

Flame away bruinsgenius!!!!!

In response to LoyalBlackNGold's comment:

He's probably the guy that Corvo punched.

In response to Not-A-Shot's comment:

Flamethrower ?

This post has been removed.

In response to ClarkGriswold's comment:

The OP is a dope.

In response to bruinsGENIUS' comment:

You still want to trade Nathan Horton ???

In response to StanleyCuptotheBruinsin2011's comment:

In response to boborielly224's comment:

LOL
If they acquire "Iggy Pop", I hope he won't be just a "Passenger" on a postseason run...

 

nice schedule Bruins have, instead of playing Florida tonight like most teams doing back to back they get to enjoy Florida till Sunday.

and in honor of Horton,  he's the one that knows all the ins and outs in South Florida therefore he's flipping the bill.

 

Makes no sense to trade away who has the highest percentage of GWG in # of play-off games played in the history of the game.

In response to bruinsGENIUS' comment:

A mind is a terrible thing to waste

In response to NeelyOrrBourque's comment:

Makes no sense to use that stat as anything more than trivia.

This post has been removed.

Another secret Montreal thread............

Trading Horton is foolish.  The B's were basically a .500 team (don't know exact record) without him after he went down last year.   Plus, the lines got all jacked up after he went out...I even remember DK playing the wing in a few games.  

In response to Not-A-Shot's comment:

Oh shut your pie hole NAS! Yea a triva question you didn't know the answer to dick weed. I suppose a guy who has a little less than a 40% rate of his goals in the play-offs are game winners isn't needed on a Stanley Cup contender eh? I love how when you use stats to make your argument it's ok, but when someone else does it it's wrong! You're double & convienent standards are totally over the top.

In response to NeelyOrrBourque's comment:

A guy scores the game's first goal at the 12 minute mark of the first period.  It ends 7-0.

GWG

Thats dumb. 

If they were to get more specific, and give us less than five minutes left in the third of a tie game or any time in OT, it would be useful.  As the stat currently stands, it's dumb.

Furthermore, using 40% here is stevegm-like.  Let's put an actual number on it:  3

And if he's such a pressure-cooker player, wouldn't he have had more than 2 for that season?

Or, maybe the stat is stupid.

 

 

Horton is the only player to score the GWG in 2 game 7's. One was in OT against the Habs. The other was the only goal in a 1-0 win against T-Bay. GWG's, what a useless stat eh?

 

 

 

A guy scores the game's first goal at the 12 minute mark of the first period.  It ends 7-0.

 

GWG

Thats dumb. 

If they were to get more specific, and give us less than five minutes left in the third of a tie game or any time in OT, it would be useful.  As the stat currently stands, it's dumb.

Furthermore, using 40% here is stevegm-like.  Let's put an actual number on it:  3

And if he's such a pressure-cooker player, wouldn't he have had more than 2 for that season?

Or, maybe the stat is stupid.

 

 

 

He scored the OT winner in game 5 vs the Habs, the OT winner in Gm 7 vs the Habs & the GWG in a 1-0 game which also is a game 7! So out of his 8 play-off goals...dickweed! He got 3 legit gwg....Kapish!!! Or, is that still a stupid stat as stupid as you just looked! You have the adasity to make comments on other people's behavior NAS, but I really think you need to take a hard look in the mirror there bud. Your knowledge & intelligence is dropping really fast as of late & your act is getting really old! 

And if I had a choice I'd much rather sound like stevegm than YOU any day of the week!!! 

 

In response to bruinsGENIUS' comment:

 

So what teams have a better player than Horton available for trade genius?

In response to NeelyOrrBourque's comment:

I never suggested that he didn't get three game winning goals, Nite.  I remember each one of them.  I remember where I was when they happened!

As for the rest of it, once again, you're discussing me instead of the topic.  It's okay if you hate me.  You and your buttbuddy Dezaruchi can feel free to write all the stuff you want about me here.  Neither of you mean anything to my life and if you both died in a firey car crash tomorrow, my life would be exactly the same.

So, keep writing your junk about me.  I'll keep discussing hockey.