Krejci call????
-
Krejci call????
posted at 5/19/2011 8:55 PM EDT
- vcec
- Posts: 304
- First: 5/16/2011
- Last: 2/9/2013
anyone?? -
Re: Krejci call????
posted at 5/19/2011 8:55 PM EDT
- kelvana33
- Posts: 5734
- First: 3/28/2010
- Last: 5/20/2013
overreaction..gone are the days of the big hit. -
Re: Krejci call????
posted at 5/19/2011 8:56 PM EDT
- hangnail
- Posts: 2159
- First: 4/28/2010
- Last: 5/20/2013
Wasn't an elbow, but point of contact was the head. -
Re: Krejci call????
posted at 5/19/2011 8:57 PM EDT
- BCeagles01
- Posts: 47
- First: 12/21/2010
- Last: 6/11/2011
ive seen boychuk deliver that hit 7 times
without a penalty. -
Re: Krejci call????
posted at 5/19/2011 8:57 PM EDT
- BsLegion
- Posts: 11890
- First: 12/28/2008
- Last: 5/20/2013
vcec , did you ever play at this level ? Just too fast and the follow through has Bergeron's elbow going up. That's what the ref sees and not that it was the shoulder.Sensitive subject and most of the time they call it. -
Re: Krejci call????
posted at 5/19/2011 9:00 PM EDT
- vcec
- Posts: 304
- First: 5/16/2011
- Last: 2/9/2013
In Response to Re: Krejci call????:vcec , did you ever play at this level ? Just too fast and the follow through has Bergeron's elbow going up. That's what the ref sees and not that it was the shoulder.Sensitive subject and most of the time they call it.
Posted by BsLegionjust asking for opinions......... -
Re: Krejci call????
posted at 5/19/2011 9:00 PM EDT
- LUCICmilan17
- Posts: 1776
- First: 2/18/2011
- Last: 4/17/2012
Guess it wasnt as bad as the radio guys said it was -
Re: Krejci call????
posted at 5/19/2011 9:04 PM EDT
- bnice0015
- Posts: 54
- First: 8/3/2005
- Last: 5/16/2013
he never came back out after..........i'm worried -
Re: Krejci call????
posted at 5/19/2011 9:05 PM EDT
- CafardoSaysTradeBrady
- Posts: 223
- First: 12/21/2010
- Last: 6/12/2011
a perfect hockey hit on a player looking down at the puck while gathering it and skating.exactly like Boychuck on Gagne game 1. -
Re: Krejci call????
posted at 5/19/2011 9:06 PM EDT
- BsLegion
- Posts: 11890
- First: 12/28/2008
- Last: 5/20/2013
In Response to Re: Krejci call????:In Response to Re: Krejci call???? : just asking for opinions.........
Posted by vcec
Not trying to offend you. I play hockey still today bit not at that level. Refs have a hard read on that play.
I just hope Krejci is ok. -
Re: Krejci call????
posted at 5/19/2011 9:07 PM EDT
- vcec
- Posts: 304
- First: 5/16/2011
- Last: 2/9/2013
In Response to Re: Krejci call????:In Response to Re: Krejci call???? : Not trying to offend you. I play hockey still today bit not at that level. Refs have a hard read on that play. I just hope Krejci is ok.
Posted by BsLegiontx, not offended at all. just soliciting feedback -
Re: Krejci call????
posted at 5/19/2011 9:08 PM EDT
- LUCICmilan17
- Posts: 1776
- First: 2/18/2011
- Last: 4/17/2012
hes on the bench now so thats good
-
Re: Krejci call????
posted at 5/19/2011 9:12 PM EDT
- shuperman
- Posts: 9584
- First: 12/16/2005
- Last: 5/18/2013
As BsL points out. Refs are over sensitive to these hits. Tbay got away with a few calls as well. Roli playing the puck in the no-no zone.
It was a clean hit. -
Re: Krejci call????
posted at 5/19/2011 9:16 PM EDT
- dbg1
- Posts: 16
- First: 12/3/2012
- Last: 5/19/2013
In Response to Re: Krejci call????:In Response to Re: Krejci call???? : Not trying to offend you. I play hockey still today bit not at that level. Refs have a hard read on that play. I just hope Krejci is ok.
Posted by BsLegion
I agree, i think we got the call, just because he followed through with his elbow. If he kept his arms down, then no penalty. -
Re: Krejci call????
posted at 5/19/2011 9:19 PM EDT
- red75
- Posts: 5665
- First: 11/28/2007
- Last: 5/20/2013
I so don't understand the new headshot rule. TSN was saying since it was a north south hit, no suspension and should not have been a penalty, but the same hit east west would be a penalty and deserve a suspension. What would be the difference in terms of physical effects? -
Re: Krejci call????
posted at 5/19/2011 9:20 PM EDT
- shuperman
- Posts: 9584
- First: 12/16/2005
- Last: 5/18/2013
And just on this topic. DK has to know these types of hits are gonna happen. Smarten up DK. -
Re: Krejci call????
posted at 5/19/2011 9:21 PM EDT
- shuperman
- Posts: 9584
- First: 12/16/2005
- Last: 5/18/2013
red,
I think its all about the blindside. And to be honest. Those bozo's don't know. Lord the league doesnt know either -
Re: Krejci call????
posted at 5/19/2011 9:36 PM EDT
- red75
- Posts: 5665
- First: 11/28/2007
- Last: 5/20/2013
Well just so long as NO ONE has a bloody clue. They really have to clarify this rule. -
Re: Krejci call????
posted at 5/19/2011 9:42 PM EDT
- shuperman
- Posts: 9584
- First: 12/16/2005
- Last: 5/18/2013
red,
I have more trust in you making the correct call. they seriously have no idea. I have seen hits I thought for sure would be a suspension and then shake my head at ones that are.
They are trying to take head shots out. Problem is they getting rid of good clean hockey hits -
Re: Krejci call????
posted at 5/19/2011 9:50 PM EDT
- red75
- Posts: 5665
- First: 11/28/2007
- Last: 5/20/2013
Shupe, thanks for the vote of cofidence, but I'm pretty sure that Kelly Fraser is happy he's retired now, because even he couldn't make sense of this mess.
Let's say Chara checks St. Louis north south while Z's arms are in front of his chest while making a hockey play. Odds are Z's arms are going to hit st Louis in the head, due to the foot in height difference. Now an arm to the head is supposed to be a suspension (maybe, sorta, sometimes) In this case is that a penalty? A minor or major? A mach penalty? A suspension? Or nothing?
The NHL has done a bloody mess of making sense of what the new rule means and how it is supposed to be enforced. -
Re: Krejci call????
posted at 5/19/2011 9:54 PM EDT
- shuperman
- Posts: 9584
- First: 12/16/2005
- Last: 5/18/2013
Actually red,
StLouis would hit Chara's knee but i understand where you are coming from. I thought the Torres hit on Eberle was clean. Torres wasnt playing the puck. He wanted to hit the man who leaned fwd exposing his head.
The victims are just as guilty in many cases as the hitter. What the heck is DK doing skating backwards up the ice to start. When was he ever taught that? -
Re: Krejci call????
posted at 5/19/2011 11:05 PM EDT
- SanDogBrewin
- Posts: 14490
- First: 4/18/2009
- Last: 5/20/2013
48.1 Illegal Check to the Head – A lateral or blind side hit to an opponent where the head is targeted and/or the principal point of contact is not permitted."
I think the play will get reviewed but I don't think Murphy will give a suspension out. -
Re: Krejci call????
posted at 5/19/2011 11:09 PM EDT
- Fletcher1
- Posts: 5200
- First: 7/14/2008
- Last: 5/20/2013
I thought it was a perfectly clean hit. Bad call.
If it makes you feel any better Roloson played the puck outside of the trapazoid during the PP, with the ref watching, and he just swallowed the whistle. Refs even things up. -
Re: Krejci call????
posted at 5/19/2011 11:16 PM EDT
- olsonstephanie
- Posts: 500
- First: 11/8/2009
- Last: 7/9/2011
I agree, refs are so inconsistent, and for that reason players will keep trying stuff -
Re: Krejci call????
posted at 5/19/2011 11:56 PM EDT
- SoxFanInIL
- Posts: 2347
- First: 8/9/2012
- Last: 5/13/2013
Absolutely not an elbowing penalty. And the league has been allowing the Nick Kronwall" "jumping into players" (should be called charging penalties) for quite awhile.
That hit was another function of the Darth Vader style shoulder pads from 2011 making the hit more damaging than it should be. No elbow, referees overreacting to shots near the head.
And David simply has to have his head up on that play. Legal hit, a hockey play.