Re: Marchund deserved a little more in his defense from his mates...
posted at 4/11/2013 5:33 PM EDT
In response to Fletcher1's comment:
In response to JWensink's comment:
Just accept the fact that half the posters on here will not type anything that ever is critical of the Bruins. This latest unemotional display of not defending a team mate goes back a long way. Just this year there have been more than a few, and after the Savard incident it would be nice to believe that that kind of thing was behind them, but sadly it's not. There was no mention from anyone but myself when earlier in the year Drew Stafford came across the ice and tried to take off Hamiltons head with a vicious elbow. There was no response, and that is unacceptable, and is a red flag to anyone who knows how to win and what it is to compete with character and emotion. Or the pathetic display by S.Thornton when he was so kind as to ask Neil if he did anything inappropriate to Kelly. Just lame as it gets. It's obvious that you are debating with those who don't have the the life experience to know any better. This is a team that threw 2 hits in the entire first period, and watched one of there own get a blatant head shot with intent to injure and did nothing. Those issues are one in the same. They did nothing when it happened - they did nothing after it happened - they did nothing for the rest of the game after everyone knew what happened. It is a sympton of a much bigger problem - you are right to be outraged, but you're not going to get some of these yahoos to give in. There are some of us who know what you're jumping up and down about, and feel the exact same way. These are the same ding dongs who defended the Bruins reaction after the Savard hit.
Oh boy, the perfect Wen-response. I couldn't have done a better parody if I tried.
-The usual whiny, victim mentality? Check.
-The imagined me-against-the-world drama? Check.
-The demands for "toughness" in every situation whether it makes sense or not, or has anything to do with winning hockey games ("Seguin needs more PIMs!")? Check.
-The delusions and made up info about other posters (name which posters defended the Savard response...) Check.
Classic. But MeanE doesn't deserve to get lumped in with the drama queen here.
"What do you want, someone to find him in the parking lot?
The guys on the ice didn't see it and then Volchenkov got kicked out of the game. "
Fletch the liar
Well can't help yourself I see...please tell us how you know what the players on the ice saw. Or is it just another one of your fabrications? Check
There were countless posters who said that it was about the two points, and that nobody saw it on the ice when Savard went down, any honest poster on this board will verify that - total nonsense without any reality at all , I see a pattern developing - Check
"The demands for "toughness" in every situation whether it makes sense or not, or has anything to do with winning hockey games ("Seguin needs more PIMs!")?"
Never said that Seguin needs more PIMs, never said it, I said that he rarely takes penalties due to playing with an edge in his game...another lie from the liar - Check
Toughness has everything to do with winning...That's what a loser can't understand - Check
Everything you just said is a lie - you are a proven liar - talk about a parody