Playing the second string goalie cost Bruins a point.

  1. This post has been removed.

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from dbg1. Show dbg1's posts

    Re: Playing the second string goalie cost Bruins a point.

    Anyone who has a user name dedicated to hoping that a bruins player fails is truly pathetic.  Why not post to the dumb.a.s.s. who drew the penalty that lead to the goal?  Are you a troll or a Hab fan?
     
  3. This post has been removed.

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from SanDogBrewin. Show SanDogBrewin's posts

    Re: Playing the second string goalie cost Bruins a point.

    In Response to Re: Playing the second string goalie cost Bruins a point.:
    [QUOTE]  Are you a troll or a Hab fan? Posted by dbg1[/QUOTE]

    Both of ^This!
     
  5. This post has been removed.

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from BadHabitude. Show BadHabitude's posts

    Re: Playing the second string goalie cost Bruins a point.



    CJ is finally making the right move. 
    1) a playoff spot is virtually clinched
    2) they still have 3 pts on the Habs
    3) as I've been saying all year, TT plays best when he's been rested and tonight even Milbury said that.
    4) Rask or Auld or name your backup you have to rest TT
     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from LoyalBlackNGold. Show LoyalBlackNGold's posts

    Re: Playing the second string goalie cost Bruins a point.

    In Response to Re: Playing the second string goalie cost Bruins a point.:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Playing the second string goalie cost Bruins a point. : Except for the fact he isn't a very good nhl goaltender. I am sure he is a decent person. This loss is all on Rask after blowing lead after lead.
    Posted by tukka_fall[/QUOTE]

    how can u possibly blame this game on tukka? even after the messed d-man line change he stopped 2 shots at point blank and couldn't get to the last chance cause bergeron was in the way. were u talking like this Tuesday nite when tukka absolutely stood on his head and was the biggest reason the bruins got 2 points.
     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from Bruinfaninnewjersey. Show Bruinfaninnewjersey's posts

    Re: Playing the second string goalie cost Bruins a point.

    Rask played well... the folks in front of him had too many breakdowns and Rinne made some great saves.

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from zamboni24. Show zamboni24's posts

    Re: Playing the second string goalie cost Bruins a point.

    Tying goal -- Save on a breakaway followed by save on a rebound followed by a third consecutive shot where an entire line of Bruins players decided to NOT follow anyone into the Bruin zone. CJ should make that line walk to Toronto for Saturday nights game.
     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from callodthedom19. Show callodthedom19's posts

    Re: Playing the second string goalie cost Bruins a point.

    In Response to Re: Playing the second string goalie cost Bruins a point.:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Playing the second string goalie cost Bruins a point. : how can u possibly blame this game on tukka? even after the messed d-man line change he stopped 2 shots at point blank and couldn't get to the last chance cause bergeron was in the way. were u talking like this Tuesday nite when tukka absolutely stood on his head and was the biggest reason the bruins got 2 points.
    Posted by LoyalBlackNGold[/QUOTE]
    He said Tuukka let in two softies on Tuesday actually.
     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from kelvana33. Show kelvana33's posts

    Re: Playing the second string goalie cost Bruins a point.

    Stupidest post yet.Blaming Tuuka...Wow. You actually insult the game when you have it on your television.
     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from anacanapana. Show anacanapana's posts

    Re: Playing the second string goalie cost Bruins a point.

    In Response to Re: Playing the second string goalie cost Bruins a point.:
    [QUOTE]Tying goal -- Save on a breakaway followed by save on a rebound followed by a third consecutive shot where an entire line of Bruins players decided to NOT follow anyone into the Bruin zone. CJ should make that line walk to Toronto for Saturday nights game.
    Posted by zamboni24[/QUOTE]

    Couldn't agree more! This was why Rask threw his stick in the air, IMO. Absolutely shitty backchecking. I kept waiting for a Bs sweater to make an appearance. Who was on the ice then? Somebody needs to call them out big time! This is the time to name names. Let the team know this won't be tolerated - ever!
     
  13. This post has been removed.

     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from thedauber1. Show thedauber1's posts

    Re: Playing the second string goalie cost Bruins a point.

    your calling the OT goal an unscreened shot. you are stupid. he threw his stick because he had two Bs that could have cleared that rebound, or maybe not given up the breakaway to begin with. you are stupid. seriously your stupidity should be researched, you are that stupid, i thought people that stupid were only found in texas
     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from lucaooo. Show lucaooo's posts

    Re: Playing the second string goalie cost Bruins a point.

    How many shots in a row he is suppose to stop on a breakaway.  You must be blind to say that Tukka was not good or just an habs fan!!  You will be very happy to have Tukka when TT is not with the BS no more!!
     
  16. This post has been removed.

     
  17. This post has been removed.

     
  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from thedauber1. Show thedauber1's posts

    Re: Playing the second string goalie cost Bruins a point.

    hes having an off season and is 16th with a .917, 7 thousandths of a point away from where your boy price is, 5th place at .924........you.are.stupid
     
  19. You have chosen to ignore posts from Bookboy007. Show Bookboy007's posts

    Re: Playing the second string goalie cost Bruins a point.

    Attention shoppers...

    Please do not feed the troll.

    ...enjoy your day.
     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from dezaruchi. Show dezaruchi's posts

    Re: Playing the second string goalie cost Bruins a point.

    In Response to Playing the second string goalie cost Bruins a point.:
    [QUOTE]Now that was a pathetic display of goaltending. Get this guy back to opening the door where he belongs.
    Posted by tukka_fall[/QUOTE]
    Saying the same thing over and over again makes it no less stupid!
     
  21. You have chosen to ignore posts from lucaooo. Show lucaooo's posts

    Re: Playing the second string goalie cost Bruins a point.

    I understand why everyone is ignoring that schizophrenic troll.  I think i will do the same because he is seing things he probaly has imaginary friends too!!  Another idiot that will dissapear as soon as Rask takes the number one job again!!

     
  22. This post has been removed.

     
  23. You have chosen to ignore posts from LoyalBlackNGold. Show LoyalBlackNGold's posts

    Re: Playing the second string goalie cost Bruins a point.

    In Response to Re: Playing the second string goalie cost Bruins a point.:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Playing the second string goalie cost Bruins a point. : So I will never be rid of a idiot like you? Rask is not good enough to take the starting job from anyone. His beginners luck ran out last season. But please still consider the ignore. So I do not have to read your bad spelling or dumb replies.
    Posted by tukka_fall[/QUOTE]

    good call on number #1 goalie being in the game huh buddy. thomas lets in 4 softies to get the pull for tuukka. u know what your talking about right!
     
  24. You have chosen to ignore posts from SoxFanInIL. Show SoxFanInIL's posts

    Re: Playing the second string goalie cost Bruins a point.



    So tell us about your boyfriend tonight against Toronto, Genius.


    Oh thats right, all goals against Tuukka are terrible, all goals on your boyfriend are the teams fault.  Got it.
     

Share