Re: Pretty embarrassing
posted at 12/7/2013 8:11 AM EST
In response to DeadAhead's comment:
In response to Not-A-Shot's comment:
In response to mattbs' comment:
I think the B's are playing alright and I know they will make the playoffs but that was a tired hated habs team we played lastnight and we got out hit, outskated and as a result we lost it in the second period.
I watched every game so far and many of the games against the better teams we dedint deserve to win. imo without rask they have been playing medocre so far. They rarely play an entire 60 min., often they only have only 1 line going, pp is mediocre and pk is not as good as past years. I'm not panicing but 25% of the season gone there needs to be some work done.
Also think that maybe lines need to be reshuffled for a bit.
No teams deserves to win any game. Each win is earned.
Yeah, without the guy who takes up about 10.5% of the salary cap, I would guess they'd be worse.
Last year's PK finished at 87.1%. This year they're at 86%. Fire all coaches. Oh, two years ago it was at 83.5% and the year before was 82.6%. But, you know, don't let number get in the way of your miserable attitude.
They're one point out of first place in an eight team division with two games in hand. Yeah, they need to change the lines.
Simple minded thinking and black/white logic is the sign of a low IQ. That's you, Handy. Go give yourself another handhob in the Garden balcony. lmao
No one is claiming anything that you have said. They are simply being honest about one game.
You troll the Pats board with miserable and trollish commentary and then hang here and don't allow fans to be fans with a simple honest assessment of one game by the Bruins.
You're a fraud. More fans should call you out.
And this is why whole slews of people turn on you: blatantly stupid statements that you wave around to criticize others. I can give you five or six core reasons why, in both logic and communications, the ability to simplify complex problems or ideas and to work through complexity by distilling simple black and white options is the sign of high functioning. Faux complexity is a sign of someone who doesn't understand what they're saying well enough to simplify it.
To anyone reading the thread through, it's obvious that NAS's comments respond directly to something in an earlier post. Without Rask, they are just mediocre (yes - take away the highest paid player on any team in NHL and they likely are going to struggle); the PK isn't as good as past years (marginally worse than last year, but better by a wider margin the the two years before that including the Cup year). Don't let basic reading comprehension get in your way.