Third line

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from Not-A-Shot. Show Not-A-Shot's posts

    Re: Third line

    Funny stuff, Bob.  Many here feel Peverley should play.  I feel he shouldn't.

    So, unfortunately, your entire post is worthless.

    P.S.  Shupe is totally one of the butt boys along with me, Chowda and Dez. 

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from dezaruchi. Show dezaruchi's posts

    Re: Third line

    In response to bobforte2002's comment:

    Hey Shuperman, just in case you haven't figured it out only the queer chums whose life is the message board are allowed to offer their opinions as facts and are allowed to be correct.   When you offer up an alternative opinion all the butt boys who post on this board just about as much as they spoon each other, jump all over you. 


    Thus I'd offer some advice.  Don't bother.  These guys either all live with their moms or haven't seen a girl naked except on the other window they have open besides this message board on their computers.   Dez, Not a Shot, Chowda and the likes.   What a bunch of clowns. 

    No one is always right and no one is always wrong. It's called an opinion.  Is Peverly expoentially better than the Dog-Man probably not.  Pevs has had a bad year and the only consistent thing about his play throughout his entire career is that he's inconsistent. 

    I don't think this move is about Peverly or Daugs, it's about Jagr.  Pevs has a bit more experience and play making ability than Daugs does, whose more off a one on one player versus a guy that can create offense for others.  The big problem here is that the Bruins traded for Jagr but because of our set top 6 and Claude's refusal to break them up, Jagr's stuck on the third line. 

    I understand that the Marchand - Bergeron - Seguin line has been the best and most consistent line all year but they have stuggled at times.  I'd personally move Seguin down to the third line to play with Peverly and Kelly only because Jagr, unlike Seguin, is capable of creating more offense for himself and others than Seguin who tends to lean towards just being a sniper.  Segs can be a sniper on any line.  Putting Jagr with more skilled players like Bergeron and Marchand would probably see increased production from all three.

    Now the fraternal order of losers that post on this board will all attack and back each other up because there opinions are right and everyone elses is wrong.  And to that I say who cares. Only they really do, which is sad at best and pathetic at worst.  Carry on.




    I wondered what happened to good old Brokeback Bob. Poor guy can't write a post without referring to man on man loving. I guess hockey makes different people feel different ways.

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from jmwalters. Show jmwalters's posts

    Re: Third line

    Nothing screams pathetic more than someone posting on an on-line message board to tell other posters they are pathetic for posting on said on-line message board....

     

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from shuperman. Show shuperman's posts

    Re: Third line

    In response to Chowdahkid-'s comment:


    Where is your weasel manager BsL? 


    ..........up on the top rope distracting/complaining to the ref.



    Best postive laughed at in a while.  

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from SanDogBrewin. Show SanDogBrewin's posts

    Re: Third line

    In response to shuperman's comment:

    Speaking of sucking...please send a nice warm blanky to Souray, he has to sleep with bags on the flight to Detroit!

    Yeah thats the guy you said was done.  Good call on that.  He only avg huge minutes everynight.  Playing on a number 2 team.   You also stated our defense was fine and our top 6 needed no change and johnson was a great number 7.  



    You are a liar, straight up. The argument was who was better Wiz or Souray.

    You certainly know more than Chiarelli and Julien by keeping the core of the defenseman. It has nothing to do whether or not Bruins like or dislkes Sheldon, the cap is going down with alllot of money commited to the forwards. Plus Rask needs to be re-signed.

    Nobody cares about Souray being in a Bruins uniform but you.

    Another Epic Fail!

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from shuperman. Show shuperman's posts

    Re: Third line

    In response to SanDogBrewin's comment:

    In response to shuperman's comment:

    Speaking of sucking...please send a nice warm blanky to Souray, he has to sleep with bags on the flight to Detroit!

     

    Yeah thats the guy you said was done.  Good call on that.  He only avg huge minutes everynight.  Playing on a number 2 team.   You also stated our defense was fine and our top 6 needed no change and johnson was a great number 7.  



    You are a liar, straight up. The argument was who was better Wiz or Souray.

     

    You certainly know more than Chiarelli and Julien by keeping the core of the defenseman. It has nothing to do whether or not Bruins like or dislkes Sheldon, the cap is going down with alllot of money commited to the forwards. Plus Rask needs to be re-signed.

    Nobody cares about Souray being in a Bruins uniform but you.

    Another Epic Fail!



    Id like souray here.  Never said i was dying to have him here.  You calling anyone a liar is classic.  Your nose grew more by saying that.  And it wasnt whos better.  I said souray would be comeback player of the year if given a chance and would out pt wiz.  For the money involved as well.  Now souray is on a good team with a very strong year. 

    I havent mentioned souray in a long time.  Same as torres.  You do, to get a rise outta me?  Not sure.  

    Epic fail is repeating the same old stuff san.  You do it everytime you try and debate with me.  

    And the defense thing was about adding someone.  I mentioned redden. I said our def was a concern and we needed someone bc if someone went down we would be in trouble.  You said its fine. I said we need at least a quality dman.  Well our def hasnt looked great, guys got injured and hamilton is in the stands.  Meanwhile one of the guys i mentioned was picked up and playing great. 

    Yup.  Epic fail.  

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from Not-A-Shot. Show Not-A-Shot's posts

    Re: Third line

    In response to SanDogBrewin's comment:



    You are a liar, straight up.



    Takes one to know one.

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from SanDogBrewin. Show SanDogBrewin's posts

    Re: Third line

    In response to Not-A-Shot's comment:

    You are a liar, straight up.

    Takes one to know one.




    You proved nothing and lost on your own thread.

     

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from dezaruchi. Show dezaruchi's posts

    Re: Third line

    In response to Not-A-Shot's comment:

    In response to SanDogBrewin's comment:



    You are a liar, straight up.

     

     



    Takes one to know one.

     

     Shupe's and your tag team name can be "H2O & Vinegar".

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from JWensink. Show JWensink's posts

    Re: Third line

    I feel a lot of love in the room

     

    FWIW -  the old duager was shipped out from a team that was a walking mash unit, now he's playing with Jaromir Jagr, who btw has never played on the 3rd line in his life until he came to Boston. Go figure that these issues are even up for debate. What ? Horton or Seguin can't be moved down, but Jaromir freakin Jagr can ? Jagr has been doing magical stuff out there, but he's all alone. At the very least,put Soderberg or Peverly with him and stop reinventing the wheel. Oh yeah, it would be nice to Jagr back next year, - not sure he's feeling great about his role moving forward.

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from Not-A-Shot. Show Not-A-Shot's posts

    Re: Third line

    In response to dezaruchi's comment:

    In response to Not-A-Shot's comment:

     

    In response to SanDogBrewin's comment:



    You are a liar, straight up.

     

     



    Takes one to know one.

     

     

     

     Shupe's and your tag team name can be "H2O & Vinegar".




    I love that name.

    You two guys can be Hitachi and The Rabbit.

     
  12. This post has been removed.

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from shuperman. Show shuperman's posts

    Re: Third line

    In response to Not-A-Shot's comment:

    In response to dezaruchi's comment:

     

    In response to Not-A-Shot's comment:

     

    In response to SanDogBrewin's comment:



    You are a liar, straight up.

     

     



    Takes one to know one.

     

     

     

     Shupe's and your tag team name can be "H2O & Vinegar".

     




    I love that name.

     

    You two guys can be Hitachi and The Rabbit.



    I wanna be H2O.  Sounds cool. Like water. 

     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from Not-A-Shot. Show Not-A-Shot's posts

    Re: Third line

    In response to shuperman's comment:


    I wanna be H2O.  Sounds cool. Like water. 

     



    It makes sense for me to be Vinegar.  Bitter but necessary!

     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from shuperman. Show shuperman's posts

    Re: Third line

    In response to Not-A-Shot's comment:

    In response to shuperman's comment:

     


    I wanna be H2O.  Sounds cool. Like water. 

     

     



    It makes sense for me to be Vinegar.  Bitter but necessary!

     



    Good on fries and fish.  

     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from dezaruchi. Show dezaruchi's posts

    Re: Third line

    In response to Not-A-Shot's comment:

    In response to dezaruchi's comment:

     

    In response to Not-A-Shot's comment:

     

    In response to SanDogBrewin's comment:



    You are a liar, straight up.

     

     



    Takes one to know one.

     

     

     

     Shupe's and your tag team name can be "H2O & Vinegar".

     




    I love that name.

     

    You two guys can be Hitachi and The Rabbit.



    They call me The Rabbit but it's in reference to my car.

     
  17. You have chosen to ignore posts from Not-A-Shot. Show Not-A-Shot's posts

    Re: Third line

    I'm really hoping someone gets or at least figures out that joke.  It's one of my best ever.

     
  18. This post has been removed.

     
  19. You have chosen to ignore posts from SanDogBrewin. Show SanDogBrewin's posts

    Re: Third line

    In response to shuperman's comment:

    Speaking of sucking...please send a nice warm blanky to Souray, he has to sleep with bags on the flight to Detroit!

     

    Yeah thats the guy you said was done.  Good call on that.  He only avg huge minutes everynight.  Playing on a number 2 team.   You also stated our defense was fine and our top 6 needed no change and johnson was a great number 7.  

    You are a liar, straight up. The argument was who was better Wiz or Souray.

    You certainly know more than Chiarelli and Julien by keeping the core of the defenseman. It has nothing to do whether or not Bruins like or dislkes Sheldon, the cap is going down with alllot of money commited to the forwards. Plus Rask needs to be re-signed.

    Nobody cares about Souray being in a Bruins uniform but you.

    Another Epic Fail!

    Id like souray here.  Never said i was dying to have him here.  You calling anyone a liar is classic.  Your nose grew more by saying that.  And it wasnt whos better.  I said souray would be comeback player of the year if given a chance and would out pt wiz.  For the money involved as well.  Now souray is on a good team with a very strong year. 

    Yup.  Epic fail. 




    "You fail to mention that Souray is on a much better team. Wiz just came back from suspension and Carter hasn't been present.  Columbus has no PP and Dallas has been pretty good. Easy for your Souray express and such.Posted by BsLegion

    Shup doesn't understand the same amount of games nor does he comprehend that Wiz pulled within half of Sheldon's point totals while having played half the games (nothing to do with the suspension or Carter being out).

    I never expected Souray to slow down because he has talent."

     

    Nothing but praise while we debated the difference between the two.

     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from dezaruchi. Show dezaruchi's posts

    Re: Third line

    In response to Not-A-Shot's comment:

    I'm really hoping someone gets or at least figures out that joke.  It's one of my best ever.




    What if I get it but just don't find that it's funny?

     
  21. You have chosen to ignore posts from Not-A-Shot. Show Not-A-Shot's posts

    Re: Third line

    In response to dezaruchi's comment:




    What if I get it but just don't find that it's funny?



    If I were The Rabbit, I wouldn't be laughing either.

    But I'm not.

    And it is wicked funny.

     
  22. You have chosen to ignore posts from G4ck5. Show G4ck5's posts

    Re: Third line

    In response to Not-A-Shot's comment:

    The B's took it to the Leafs, ruling the ice for 58 minutes.

    I cannot understand why anyone would want a change.  We've been lambasting Peverley all season and now, after a 4-1 decisive victory, people want him back in.  You see how dumb that is, right?

    Third liner Daugavins played fine.  He made no mistakes that cost any goals.  I don't recall any mistakes he make that even lead to scoring opportunities.  But, you know, people are never happy, so let's bench that guy.




    Agreed. Don't fix if it's not broken. I really enjoyed watching that line the other night. they had so much puck possession, and didn't allow a goal. For Pev's thanks for the cup and there's the door.

     
  23. You have chosen to ignore posts from dezaruchi. Show dezaruchi's posts

    Re: Third line

    In response to Not-A-Shot's comment:

    In response to dezaruchi's comment:




    What if I get it but just don't find that it's funny?

     

     



    If I were The Rabbit, I wouldn't be laughing either.

     

    But I'm not.

    And it is wicked funny.




    Whatever you say Vinny. Usually funny means some laughs but hey, Dennis Miller needed some competition.

     
  24. You have chosen to ignore posts from Hanrahan1. Show Hanrahan1's posts

    Re: Third line

    In response to JWensink's comment:

     

    I feel a lot of love in the room

     

    FWIW -  the old duager was shipped out from a team that was a walking mash unit, now he's playing with Jaromir Jagr, who btw has never played on the 3rd line in his life until he came to Boston. Go figure that these issues are even up for debate. What ? Horton or Seguin can't be moved down, but Jaromir freakin Jagr can ? Jagr has been doing magical stuff out there, but he's all alone. At the very least,put Soderberg or Peverly with him and stop reinventing the wheel. Oh yeah, it would be nice to Jagr back next year, - not sure he's feeling great about his role moving forward.

     

     

    Finally. And a quality post too. I thought I was reading some sort of gloves off Family Feud forum there for a while. Thanks for getting me back on track.

    Like you said, Jagr on the third line is just a disgrace. Second maybe, but never on the third. And depending on what happens in these play offs that sort of treatment could lead to him withdrawing his interest in resigning in the summer. Sure the Bs are doing fine after one game but it doesn't bode well IMHO. If Horton and Sequin don't produce tonight I can't see how CJ can justify another Jagr third line game.

     




     

     
  25. You have chosen to ignore posts from dezaruchi. Show dezaruchi's posts

    Re: Third line

    In response to Hanrahan1's comment:

    In response to JWensink's comment:

     

    I feel a lot of love in the room

     

    FWIW -  the old duager was shipped out from a team that was a walking mash unit, now he's playing with Jaromir Jagr, who btw has never played on the 3rd line in his life until he came to Boston. Go figure that these issues are even up for debate. What ? Horton or Seguin can't be moved down, but Jaromir freakin Jagr can ? Jagr has been doing magical stuff out there, but he's all alone. At the very least,put Soderberg or Peverly with him and stop reinventing the wheel. Oh yeah, it would be nice to Jagr back next year, - not sure he's feeling great about his role moving forward.

     

     

    Finally. And a quality post too. I thought I was reading some sort of gloves off Family Feud forum there for a while. Thanks for getting me back on track.

    Like you said, Jagr on the third line is just a disgrace. Second maybe, but never on the third. And depending on what happens in these play offs that sort of treatment could lead to him withdrawing his interest in resigning in the summer. Sure the Bs are doing fine after one game but it doesn't bode well IMHO. If Horton and Sequin don't produce tonight I can't see how CJ can justify another Jagr third line game.

     




     




    You guys are seriously overvaluing Jagr's recent contributions. He's been good for most shifts and a soft giveaway machine on others. He's plays on the 3rd line and takes full 2 minute shifts on the PP. He got more ice time in game 1 than Marchhand. I don't see a problem.

     

Share