1972-73 Knicks nba champs despite lowly rebound average

  1. This post has been removed.

     
  2. This post has been removed.

     
  3. This post has been removed.

     
  4. This post has been removed.

     
  5. This post has been removed.

     
  6. This post has been removed.

     
  7. This post has been removed.

     
  8. This post has been removed.

     
  9. This post has been removed.

     
  10. This post has been removed.

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from BostonTS. Show BostonTS's posts

    Re: 1972-73 Knicks nba champs despite lowly rebound average

    " Saying that the Celtics would have beaten the Lakers in 5 games if Ray didn't get a bruised thigh is pure arrogance. Only 2 teams have won all 3 games at home in the Finals."

    b-b-but pud says that Rondo cost us the series. I'm getting confused. 

    Anyhow hats off to Seems, I hope I'm still posting in this forum when I'm 80. That said, it's not all that reassuring when we have to go back to the early 70s to make a case for the Celtics as a championship team....
     
  12. This post has been removed.

     
  13. This post has been removed.

     
  14. This post has been removed.

     
  15. This post has been removed.

     
  16. This post has been removed.

     
  17. This post has been removed.

     
  18. This post has been removed.

     
  19. This post has been removed.

     
  20. This post has been removed.

     
  21. This post has been removed.

     
  22. This post has been removed.

     
  23. You have chosen to ignore posts from PHX85014. Show PHX85014's posts

    Re: 1972-73 Knicks nba champs despite lowly rebound average

    THE KO HAS BEEN ANNOUNCED !

    I DECLARE FIERCEST IN A CLEAR KO OVER RAMEAKAP...

    I GUESS IT'S LIKE JIM ROME SAY'S "HAVE A TAKE, AND DON'T SUCK"

    RAMEAKAP HAS NO TAKE





     
  24. This post has been removed.

     
  25. This post has been removed.

     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share