'98 Celtics went 36-46 in Pitino's first year

  1. This post has been removed.

     
  2. This post has been removed.

     
  3. This post has been removed.

     
  4. This post has been removed.

     
  5. This post has been removed.

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from celticelmo. Show celticelmo's posts

    Re: '98 Celtics went 36-46 in Pitino's first year

    "IF" the Celts would have won the Tim Duncan sweepstakes.................

     
  7. This post has been removed.

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from Gasthoerer. Show Gasthoerer's posts

    Re: '98 Celtics went 36-46 in Pitino's first year

    In response to rameakap's comment:

    With stats, facts and FAR more reality based intelligence than Fiercy provided (did he provide anything?) I have made a superior defense of my opinion than he has.

    NOBODY can win this... you can't prove they wouldn't have. I can't 100% prove they would have... duh.

    So now you just look worse than me for providing NOTHING to support why a 10-12 team in November couldn't have gone 30-30 to get to my prediction of 40-45 wins with Asik.



    Rame, I gave you some facts. Kevin Durant is hunting the MVP and has sth. like 18 win shares. Do you really belive that Asik in 42 games would have given us sth similiar? He would be in the hunt for MVP (actually better cause he played only half the games)? Really?

    You assumption is mainly based on the 10-12 record at the beginnign of the season. Unfortunately the Cs, just overachieved like many young teams at the beginning of the season (gave examples for this as well). This doesn't mean the Cs were a .500 team to begin width. It is just the typical mixture of enthusiasm and the other teams not being well prepared/montivated against a team of nonames.

    You really showed some knowledge in many discussions, but in this particular discussion you were wrong. No big deal. This (nonsense) dispute with fiercy obviously makes you blind or afraid to accept the truth.

    Both of you can give sth to this forum when you stop the nitpicking. By the way: If I remember correctly, fierce never voted for less than 20 wins, but also thought we would be much better with asik.

     

     

     
  9. This post has been removed.

     
  10. This post has been removed.

     
  11. This post has been removed.

     
  12. This post has been removed.

     
  13. This post has been removed.

     
  14. This post has been removed.

     
  15. This post has been removed.

     
  16. This post has been removed.

     
  17. This post has been removed.

     
  18. This post has been removed.

     
  19. This post has been removed.

     
  20. This post has been removed.

     
  21. This post has been removed.

     
  22. This post has been removed.

     
  23. This post has been removed.

     
  24. This post has been removed.

     
  25. This post has been removed.

     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share