at the trade deadline

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from TheBigTicket05. Show TheBigTicket05's posts

    at the trade deadline

    bradley and bass for asik

    Wallace and lee for granger(aint that good anymore)

     

     

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from R9R. Show R9R's posts

    Re: at the trade deadline

    Why Granger? Why?

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from TheBigTicket05. Show TheBigTicket05's posts

    Re: at the trade deadline

    In response to R9R's comment:

     

    Why Granger? Why?

     



    just an expiring contract, or include 1st rd 

     

     
  4. This post has been removed.

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from TheBigTicket05. Show TheBigTicket05's posts

    Re: at the trade deadline

    having bradley as a role player would help them to utilize scoring guards.

     

     
  6. This post has been removed.

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from Eldunker. Show Eldunker's posts

    Re: at the trade deadline

    In response to TheBigTicket05's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    having bradley as a role player would help them to utilize scoring guards.

     

    [/QUOTE]

    I don't understand your statement.  

    Are you saying that having Bradley will help the Pacers utilize shooting guards?  How is that?  Bradley would not play before Hill or Watson at PG and certainly not in place of Stevenson (who is also a good defensive player) at SG.  

    IF you are saying that Bradley would enable the Pacers to better cover opposing SGs?  They have second year SF/SG Solomon Hill who is 6'6" and very accomplished on the defensive end.   

    Bottom line is the Pacers would have no need for Bradley, even as a role player, at either PG or SG.  The Pacers would have no need for Lee or Wallace (coming off the bench with his contract) either.

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from xxbby. Show xxbby's posts

    Re: at the trade deadline

    What's up with Olynyk? I say trade for say, Lance Stephenson? Give up Bass for him

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from xxbby. Show xxbby's posts

    Re: at the trade deadline

    In response to TheBigTicket05's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    bradley and bass for asik

    Wallace and lee for granger(aint that good anymore)

     

     

    [/QUOTE]


    Bradley is not a point guard and coach needs to tell him to pass the ball more. He left Green standing there many times during the Grizzlies game...Make him a shooter off the bench..

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from billge. Show billge's posts

    Re: at the trade deadline

    yeah, but what about, you know, Asik?

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from R9R. Show R9R's posts

    Re: at the trade deadline

    YES!

    BASS FOR ASIK! DO IT!

     

     

    Re-reading this old post ... I don't understand why people **fierce** think that Hump is such a valuable piece at the deadline? 

     

    What do we get back in return? Likely, mediocre player salary. The only reason someone would want Hump right now is to dump next year salary. At 12M, you'd have to give up picks and additional Celtic rookies to get anything back in return.

    Yes, he could be used to fetch Lamarcus Aldirdge, but that deal required Sully and the Celtics 2014 pick. There are only a few deals like that in the NBA right now. Sure, we could use Hump to get Rudy Gay... buy WHY?

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from MitchUnderpants. Show MitchUnderpants's posts

    Re: at the trade deadline


    Our front court's fine.  We need to start talking about dumping Hump, Crash, Bradley for some back court.  Ideally Rondo's knee heals fast and Ricky Davis comes back from retirement. 

     

    You guys still think Ainge is interested in Gordon Hayward?

     
  13. This post has been removed.

     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from PHX85014. Show PHX85014's posts

    Re: at the trade deadline

    In response to TheBigTicket05's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to R9R's comment:

     

    Why Granger? Why?

     



    just an expiring contract, or include 1st rd 

     

    [/QUOTE]

    BOTH OF YOU ARE CRAZY, GRANGER IS BETTER THAN BASS, WALLACE, AND EVEN JEFF GREEN !

    GRANGER WOULD ACTUALLY BE A GREAT PICKUP 

     
  15. This post has been removed.

     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from PHX85014. Show PHX85014's posts

    Re: at the trade deadline

    Short Money is Short Money !

    Granger is a top tier player who would be fun to watch with Rondo and Green , I'd like to see him play the 2 with Green at 3

    Offer Granger a home and I say the Celtics could re-sign him for BASS money....

     
  17. You have chosen to ignore posts from Rajon-Hondo. Show Rajon-Hondo's posts

    Re: at the trade deadline

    Wallace/ Brooks for Granger. Yes. It works for both teams, this and next year.

     

Share