Boston and Milwaukee should not be in the playoffs

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from PlayoffBound. Show PlayoffBound's posts

    Boston and Milwaukee should not be in the playoffs

    When a team has a record like these teams had and you were out-scored by your opponents for the whole season, you don't deserve to be a playoff team. Wow, the East is such a weak conference. 

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from hedleylamarr. Show hedleylamarr's posts

    Re: Boston and Milwaukee should not be in the playoffs

    Yes it is, but they are in the East, so they get in.

    Why don't you take your concerns to Stern?

    The Seahawks had a losing record two years ago and made the NFL playoffs..........your "argument", as usual, is flawed.

    And being "outscored" by .2 for a season is insignificant............

     
  3. This post has been removed.

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from hedleylamarr. Show hedleylamarr's posts

    Re: Boston and Milwaukee should not be in the playoffs

    In response to PlayoffBound's comment:

    In response to hedleylamarr's comment:

     

    Yes it is, but they are in the East, so they get in.

    Why don't you take your concerns to Stern?

    The Seahawks had a losing record two years ago and made the NFL playoffs..........your "argument", as usual, is flawed.

    And being "outscored" by .2 for a season is insignificant............

     



    Maybe Boston wishes they were in the west and missed the playoffs.

     

    Having a better chance at getting a better player to help their dreadful roster is not that bad of a thought...

     




    We don't think our roster is "dreadful", but thanks for your concern.

    Please worry about your own team and the fact you have to play 4 games in San Antonio, and leave the Celtics to us, okay Tommy?

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from BostonTrollSpanker. Show BostonTrollSpanker's posts

    Re: Boston and Milwaukee should not be in the playoffs

    "When a team has a record like these teams had and you were out-scored by your opponents for the whole season, you don't deserve to be a playoff team. Wow, the East is such a weak conference. "

    Hmm well the difference is that our team overperformed based on our talent and your team underperformed to the point that your playoffs began two weeks ago. For a team with Pao and Dwight to struggle to get into the playoffs (not to mention Kobe) is a disgrace and a sign of pathetic coaching on D'Antoni's part...

    Milwaukee is not a good team, but the Celtics have a good shot at beating the Knicks, who were good enough to beat OKC, the best team in the west, recently. 

    Add to that the fact that this year's NBA champions will come out of the east and I'm not sure you can call the conference weak can you - unless you're an idiot which you may well be. The east is not deep but it's not weak, you'll find that out when your western conference champ loses quickly to the Heat in the finals.

     
  6. This post has been removed.

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from PlayoffBound. Show PlayoffBound's posts

    Re: Boston and Milwaukee should not be in the playoffs

    The Lakers had 3 coaches this year.

    They implemented a new offense and defense.

    They have had serious injuries.

    In the second half of the year, they over-achieved.

     

     
  8. This post has been removed.

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from SFBostonFan. Show SFBostonFan's posts

    Re: Boston and Milwaukee should not be in the playoffs

    In response to BostonTrollSpanker's comment:

    "When a team has a record like these teams had and you were out-scored by your opponents for the whole season, you don't deserve to be a playoff team. Wow, the East is such a weak conference. "

    Hmm well the difference is that our team overperformed based on our talent and your team underperformed to the point that your playoffs began two weeks ago. For a team with Pao and Dwight to struggle to get into the playoffs (not to mention Kobe) is a disgrace and a sign of pathetic coaching on D'Antoni's part...

    Milwaukee is not a good team, but the Celtics have a good shot at beating the Knicks, who were good enough to beat OKC, the best team in the west, recently. 

    Add to that the fact that this year's NBA champions will come out of the east and I'm not sure you can call the conference weak can you - unless you're an idiot which you may well be. The east is not deep but it's not weak, you'll find that out when your western conference champ loses quickly to the Heat in the finals.




    Right on observations/ comments...EXCELLENT POST !!!

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from ANONMD08. Show ANONMD08's posts

    Re: Boston and Milwaukee should not be in the playoffs

    In response to SFBostonFan's comment:

    In response to BostonTrollSpanker's comment:

     

    "When a team has a record like these teams had and you were out-scored by your opponents for the whole season, you don't deserve to be a playoff team. Wow, the East is such a weak conference. "

    Hmm well the difference is that our team overperformed based on our talent and your team underperformed to the point that your playoffs began two weeks ago. For a team with Pao and Dwight to struggle to get into the playoffs (not to mention Kobe) is a disgrace and a sign of pathetic coaching on D'Antoni's part...

    Milwaukee is not a good team, but the Celtics have a good shot at beating the Knicks, who were good enough to beat OKC, the best team in the west, recently. 

    Add to that the fact that this year's NBA champions will come out of the east and I'm not sure you can call the conference weak can you - unless you're an idiot which you may well be. The east is not deep but it's not weak, you'll find that out when your western conference champ loses quickly to the Heat in the finals.

     




    Right on observations/ comments...EXCELLENT POST !!!

     




    I totally agree with this. Tell me who in the West can knock off the Heat? I'm a Celtics fan but also a realist. 

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from PlayoffBound. Show PlayoffBound's posts

    Re: Boston and Milwaukee should not be in the playoffs

    Five of the six best teams are in the Western Conference.
    Do you really think the Knicks or Indiana would beat the Clippers, Denver or Memphis in the playoffs?

    Boston did not over-achieve.
    They were 2 games under .500 with Rhondo and 3 games over .500 without him.
    It's a good thing they play Charlotte, Washington, Cleveland, Orlando, etc so often.

     
  12. This post has been removed.

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from OneOnOne. Show OneOnOne's posts

    Re: Boston and Milwaukee should not be in the playoffs

    In response to PlayoffBound's comment:

    The Lakers had 3 coaches this year.

    They implemented a new offense and defense.

    They have had serious injuries.

    In the second half of the year, they over-achieved.

     



    3 coaches?   That is pathetic.

    New offense?  Looks the same to me,  Kome gunning away with horrible shots.

    Don't cry to us about injuries,  the last few years the C's have had a ton.

    Second half a year?  They have outshot their opponents from the free throw line in about 16 straight games, many times by a obscence amount, in very close games, including last night.  16 straight games?  Incredible.  Hmmm makes you wonder if someone wanted the Lakers in the playoffs didn't it.

     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from 37stories. Show 37stories's posts

    Re: Boston and Milwaukee should not be in the playoffs

    In response to PlayoffBound's comment:

    The Lakers had 3 coaches this year.

    They implemented a new offense and defense.

    They have had serious injuries.

    In the second half of the year, they over-achieved.

     




    Oh those scrappy little Lakers! How proud you must be!

     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from MajicMVP. Show MajicMVP's posts

    Re: Boston and Milwaukee should not be in the playoffs

    In response to ANONMD08's comment:

    In response to SFBostonFan's comment:

     

    In response to BostonTrollSpanker's comment:

     

    "When a team has a record like these teams had and you were out-scored by your opponents for the whole season, you don't deserve to be a playoff team. Wow, the East is such a weak conference. "

    Hmm well the difference is that our team overperformed based on our talent and your team underperformed to the point that your playoffs began two weeks ago. For a team with Pao and Dwight to struggle to get into the playoffs (not to mention Kobe) is a disgrace and a sign of pathetic coaching on D'Antoni's part...

    Milwaukee is not a good team, but the Celtics have a good shot at beating the Knicks, who were good enough to beat OKC, the best team in the west, recently. 

    Add to that the fact that this year's NBA champions will come out of the east and I'm not sure you can call the conference weak can you - unless you're an idiot which you may well be. The east is not deep but it's not weak, you'll find that out when your western conference champ loses quickly to the Heat in the finals.

     




    Right on observations/ comments...EXCELLENT POST !!!

     

     




    I totally agree with this. Tell me who in the West can knock off the Heat? I'm a Celtics fan but also a realist. 

     


    well, tell us who in the east can knock off the heat...

    one great team in the east, and the rest of the east are riding on its reputation...

     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from hedleylamarr. Show hedleylamarr's posts

    Re: Boston and Milwaukee should not be in the playoffs

    In response to 37stories' comment:

    In response to PlayoffBound's comment:

     

    The Lakers had 3 coaches this year.

    They implemented a new offense and defense.

    They have had serious injuries.

    In the second half of the year, they over-achieved.

     

     




     

    Oh those scrappy little Lakers! How proud you must be!




    LOL

     
  17. This post has been removed.

     
  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from MajicMVP. Show MajicMVP's posts

    Re: Boston and Milwaukee should not be in the playoffs

    In response to hedleylamarr's comment:

    In response to PlayoffBound's comment:

     

    In response to hedleylamarr's comment:

     

    Yes it is, but they are in the East, so they get in.

    Why don't you take your concerns to Stern?

    The Seahawks had a losing record two years ago and made the NFL playoffs..........your "argument", as usual, is flawed.

    And being "outscored" by .2 for a season is insignificant............

     



    Maybe Boston wishes they were in the west and missed the playoffs.

     

    Having a better chance at getting a better player to help their dreadful roster is not that bad of a thought...

     

     




    We don't think our roster is "dreadful", but thanks for your concern.

     

    Please worry about your own team and the fact you have to play 4 games in San Antonio, and leave the Celtics to us, okay Tommy?



    funny this forum is fullof threads about the lakers' woes: crappiness will continue, anyone else sad about the lakers, gasoft whiners, ... 

    celtics fans worry about the lakers more than lakers fans. in contrary, you can hardly find a thread about celtic woes in the lakers forum. over there, the celtics are as relevant as the bobcats...

     
  19. You have chosen to ignore posts from hedleylamarr. Show hedleylamarr's posts

    Re: Boston and Milwaukee should not be in the playoffs

    In response to MajicMVP's comment:

    In response to hedleylamarr's comment:

     

    In response to PlayoffBound's comment:

     

    In response to hedleylamarr's comment:

     

    Yes it is, but they are in the East, so they get in.

    Why don't you take your concerns to Stern?

    The Seahawks had a losing record two years ago and made the NFL playoffs..........your "argument", as usual, is flawed.

    And being "outscored" by .2 for a season is insignificant............

     



    Maybe Boston wishes they were in the west and missed the playoffs.

     

    Having a better chance at getting a better player to help their dreadful roster is not that bad of a thought...

     

     




    We don't think our roster is "dreadful", but thanks for your concern.

     

    Please worry about your own team and the fact you have to play 4 games in San Antonio, and leave the Celtics to us, okay Tommy?

     



    funny this forum is fullof threads about the lakers' woes: crappiness will continue, anyone else sad about the lakers, gasoft whiners, ... 

     

    celtics fans worry about the lakers more than lakers fans. in contrary, you can hardly find a thread about celtic woes in the lakers forum. over there, the celtics are as relevant as the bobcats...




    Simple - because they don't allow "trolls" over on lakers websites.  I BET if  Celtics fans infested a lakers board, the situations would be similiar.........

     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from PlayoffBound. Show PlayoffBound's posts

    Re: Boston and Milwaukee should not be in the playoffs

    In response to hedleylamarr's comment:

    In response to MajicMVP's comment:

     

    In response to hedleylamarr's comment:

     

    In response to PlayoffBound's comment:

     

    In response to hedleylamarr's comment:

     

    Yes it is, but they are in the East, so they get in.

    Why don't you take your concerns to Stern?

    The Seahawks had a losing record two years ago and made the NFL playoffs..........your "argument", as usual, is flawed.

    And being "outscored" by .2 for a season is insignificant............

     



    Maybe Boston wishes they were in the west and missed the playoffs.

     

    Having a better chance at getting a better player to help their dreadful roster is not that bad of a thought...

     

     




    We don't think our roster is "dreadful", but thanks for your concern.

     

    Please worry about your own team and the fact you have to play 4 games in San Antonio, and leave the Celtics to us, okay Tommy?

     



    funny this forum is fullof threads about the lakers' woes: crappiness will continue, anyone else sad about the lakers, gasoft whiners, ... 

     

    celtics fans worry about the lakers more than lakers fans. in contrary, you can hardly find a thread about celtic woes in the lakers forum. over there, the celtics are as relevant as the bobcats...

     




    Simple - because they don't allow "trolls" over on lakers websites.  I BET if  Celtics fans infested a lakers board, the situations would be similiar.........

     



    Maybe someone should start a Facebook page and keep the trolls out. 

     
  21. You have chosen to ignore posts from PlayoffBound. Show PlayoffBound's posts

    Re: Boston and Milwaukee should not be in the playoffs

    In response to OneOnOne's comment:

    In response to PlayoffBound's comment:

     

    The Lakers had 3 coaches this year.

    They implemented a new offense and defense.

    They have had serious injuries.

    In the second half of the year, they over-achieved.

     

     



    3 coaches?   That is pathetic.

     

    New offense?  Looks the same to me,  Kome gunning away with horrible shots.

    Don't cry to us about injuries,  the last few years the C's have had a ton.

    Second half a year?  They have outshot their opponents from the free throw line in about 16 straight games, many times by a obscence amount, in very close games, including last night.  16 straight games?  Incredible.  Hmmm makes you wonder if someone wanted the Lakers in the playoffs didn't it.



    I know you are old but I thought you were still ok with your memory.  

    Mike Brown had the same offense?

    Did you notice that Kobe and Nash have almost changed roles?

    More crying about fouls? Good stuff. 

     
  22. You have chosen to ignore posts from MajicMVP. Show MajicMVP's posts

    Re: Boston and Milwaukee should not be in the playoffs

    In response to hedleylamarr's comment:

    In response to MajicMVP's comment:

     

    In response to hedleylamarr's comment:

     

    In response to PlayoffBound's comment:

     

    In response to hedleylamarr's comment:

     

    Yes it is, but they are in the East, so they get in.

    Why don't you take your concerns to Stern?

    The Seahawks had a losing record two years ago and made the NFL playoffs..........your "argument", as usual, is flawed.

    And being "outscored" by .2 for a season is insignificant............

     



    Maybe Boston wishes they were in the west and missed the playoffs.

     

    Having a better chance at getting a better player to help their dreadful roster is not that bad of a thought...

     

     




    We don't think our roster is "dreadful", but thanks for your concern.

     

    Please worry about your own team and the fact you have to play 4 games in San Antonio, and leave the Celtics to us, okay Tommy?

     



    funny this forum is fullof threads about the lakers' woes: crappiness will continue, anyone else sad about the lakers, gasoft whiners, ... 

     

    celtics fans worry about the lakers more than lakers fans. in contrary, you can hardly find a thread about celtic woes in the lakers forum. over there, the celtics are as relevant as the bobcats...

     




    Simple - because they don't allow "trolls" over on lakers websites.  I BET if  Celtics fans infested a lakers board, the situations would be similiar.........

     



    i bet not. lakers fans simply don't care about irrelevant teams...

     
  23. You have chosen to ignore posts from hedleylamarr. Show hedleylamarr's posts

    Re: Boston and Milwaukee should not be in the playoffs

    In response to MajicMVP's comment:

    In response to hedleylamarr's comment:

     

    In response to MajicMVP's comment:

     

    In response to hedleylamarr's comment:

     

    In response to PlayoffBound's comment:

     

    In response to hedleylamarr's comment:

     

    Yes it is, but they are in the East, so they get in.

    Why don't you take your concerns to Stern?

    The Seahawks had a losing record two years ago and made the NFL playoffs..........your "argument", as usual, is flawed.

    And being "outscored" by .2 for a season is insignificant............

     



    Maybe Boston wishes they were in the west and missed the playoffs.

     

    Having a better chance at getting a better player to help their dreadful roster is not that bad of a thought...

     

     




    We don't think our roster is "dreadful", but thanks for your concern.

     

    Please worry about your own team and the fact you have to play 4 games in San Antonio, and leave the Celtics to us, okay Tommy?

     



    funny this forum is fullof threads about the lakers' woes: crappiness will continue, anyone else sad about the lakers, gasoft whiners, ... 

     

    celtics fans worry about the lakers more than lakers fans. in contrary, you can hardly find a thread about celtic woes in the lakers forum. over there, the celtics are as relevant as the bobcats...

     




    Simple - because they don't allow "trolls" over on lakers websites.  I BET if  Celtics fans infested a lakers board, the situations would be similiar.........

     

     



    i bet not. lakers fans simply don't care about irrelevant teams...

     




    WRONG - I 've posted on the LA Times..................FACT - I was called a troll, and said my opinion was not welcome...........kind of like you on here!!

     
  24. This post has been removed.

     
  25. You have chosen to ignore posts from hedleylamarr. Show hedleylamarr's posts

    Re: Boston and Milwaukee should not be in the playoffs

    In response to MajicMVP's comment:

    In response to hedleylamarr's comment:

     

    In response to MajicMVP's comment:

     

    In response to hedleylamarr's comment:

     

    In response to MajicMVP's comment:

     

    In response to hedleylamarr's comment:

     

    In response to PlayoffBound's comment:

     

    In response to hedleylamarr's comment:

     

    Yes it is, but they are in the East, so they get in.

    Why don't you take your concerns to Stern?

    The Seahawks had a losing record two years ago and made the NFL playoffs..........your "argument", as usual, is flawed.

    And being "outscored" by .2 for a season is insignificant............

     



    Maybe Boston wishes they were in the west and missed the playoffs.

     

    Having a better chance at getting a better player to help their dreadful roster is not that bad of a thought...

     

     




    We don't think our roster is "dreadful", but thanks for your concern.

     

    Please worry about your own team and the fact you have to play 4 games in San Antonio, and leave the Celtics to us, okay Tommy?

     



    funny this forum is fullof threads about the lakers' woes: crappiness will continue, anyone else sad about the lakers, gasoft whiners, ... 

     

    celtics fans worry about the lakers more than lakers fans. in contrary, you can hardly find a thread about celtic woes in the lakers forum. over there, the celtics are as relevant as the bobcats...

     




    Simple - because they don't allow "trolls" over on lakers websites.  I BET if  Celtics fans infested a lakers board, the situations would be similiar.........

     

     



    i bet not. lakers fans simply don't care about irrelevant teams...

     

     




    WRONG - I 've posted on the LA Times..................FACT - I was called a troll, and said my opinion was not welcome...........kind of like you on here!!

     

     



     

    you posted on la times? what does that have to do with lakets fans don't care or post about the celtics? are you a closet laker fan trying to disciss the celtics?




    Don't believe your initial posit, anyway.  Got a link or proof there is no talk of the Celtics on lakers websites?

     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share