brooks again fav

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from fedup13. Show fedup13's posts

    brooks again fav

    36pts 6 rebounds 5asists  give him a chance trade crawford  fav shoud go to maine with pressy

     
  2. This post has been removed.

     
  3. This post has been removed.

     
  4. This post has been removed.

     
  5. This post has been removed.

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from charliedarling. Show charliedarling's posts

    Re: brooks again fav

    Do not be fooled by Brooks and his D League offensive stats. 

    The D League is just the place to hide his NBA weaknesses as the weaknesses can be swept nicely under the carpet when you only look at points scored.

    I would bet that the guys he has been (or hasn't been) covering are scoring very well against him even in the D League.

     
  7. This post has been removed.

     
  8. This post has been removed.

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from TheBigTicket05. Show TheBigTicket05's posts

    Re: brooks again fav

    In response to Mployee8's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    My question remains ...  why can't we use Brooks at SF rather than Wallace since his offense is so much better (Defense not withstanding)?

    [/QUOTE]
    not a good idea for a player who is in 30mm contract.

     
  10. This post has been removed.

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from TheBigTicket05. Show TheBigTicket05's posts

    Re: brooks again fav

    In response to Mployee8's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to TheBigTicket05's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to Mployee8's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    My question remains ...  why can't we use Brooks at SF rather than Wallace since his offense is so much better (Defense not withstanding)?

    [/QUOTE]
    not a good idea for a player who is in 30mm contract.

    [/QUOTE]


    Brooks doesn't need to take all his minutes ... time at SG (Lee's mins) and some of Wallace's.

    [/QUOTE]

    wallace should play 48 minutes every game. punish him that way

     
  12. This post has been removed.

     

Share