Re: Celtic Dominance
posted at 9/22/2012 3:41 AM EDT
In response to Red-16Russ-11's comment:
In response to KingShaq's comment:
Not answering ANY of my questions, and then calling ME gutless is your MO. Think I'll let you get away with that? You must really be smarting......................
You did not any of mine either.
You said: We needed an inside presence AFTER Bynum went down' - Phil Jackson!!
I said: And the relationship of this statement to "if Bynum had not been injured"? Are you going to say "then we don't need an inside presence"?
You still haven't got out of this loop. Good grief!!!
You said: That's your twisting of my words.....................not my point.
Once you wimped out with "not my point", Bingo, you tried not to argue the hypothetical scenario "Had Bynum not injured". That's why I challenged you with the three posts:
Your own words:
9/7/2012 01:17:37 EDT
"prove without a doubt that the lakers would not have Gasol if Bynum wasn't injured!"
9/7/2012 01:25:43 EDT
"Since they didn't approach MEM until after Bynum got hurt.............I said the trade would not have happened."
"and the trade would not have been made if he didn't get hurt"
Now tell me what exactly your words are...
You dared not argue the hypothetical scenario anymore? re-stating the actual fact isn't going to save you. We all know Gasol got trade after Bynum got hurt. If you are so desperate to get me to agree with you on some facts that weren't our argument, then sure, I'll play. You can state 903876601 more facts and you'll get no argument from me, like "1+1=2", "2*3=6", "the sun rises from the east", "Lebron won the MVP in 2012", etc.
But when pushe comes to shove, your original hypothesis got roasted:
the lakers would not have Gasol if Bynum wasn't injured
I said the trade would not have happened.
and the trade would not have been made if he didn't get hurt
And you have to wimp out with "not my point", "Never said the inverse- only said - because Bynum got injured is the reason the lakers have Gasol"?
You think you can get away by moving the goalposts?