Just want to address the idiotic post by RallyC that the Celtics are 36-17 without Rondo. in 2009 when Garnett went down with a knee injury the Celtics were 18-7 without him. So clearly the Celtics are better without Garnett.
Who doesn't wish we had started 18-7 out of the gate this year? Wait, those teams had Pierce, Allen, and Rondo so uhm, they might win a few games. And when Rnodo went down most of those teams still had KG, Pierce and Ray Allen.
Maybe that is why their record has mostly been good without Rondo. It's mostly been good period. No matter who is out.
This year has been different as we have mosly been mediocre. last year at this point we were mediocre. We turned it on the second half of last year. with Rondo, but the worst bench in the league.
This year without Rondo, Barbosa. Green and Terry, All much better than Dooling Pietrius, and Daniels have stepped up. We are playing well, but let's not get crazy.