In response to James37's comment:
In response to concord27's comment:
In response to James37's comment:
In response to kyceltic's comment:
In response to BCSP's comment:
Wow! If it does happen, I speculate there will be an additional complimentary trade!
If Bledsoe is traded for, Rondo will be gone soon after!!
I'm fine with shipping rondo out if we land bledsoe and a big like DMC. But I still love rondo..Got to give up talent to get it back.
A TEAM OF MORONS YOU ARE WISHING FOR.
Id rather watch what you consider a team of morons then the inconsistent supporting cast we currently have. But honestly I'd watch any player as long as they have on a celtic uniform.
I need you to understand its about building assets, its about making a strategic move. Please take your fan had off for ten seconds and think strategically. You cannot win in the NBA without stars. We cannot get stars without tanking or acquiring assets (We aren't ever getting any free agents in their prime). I am simply saying if we can get assets then why not (out best option to getting a star). Especially with Rondo out, we can see what kind of potential the assets really have along with seeing what we have in green and bradley (who will need to go if theu cant produce).
Outside of pierce, KG and rondo - no one on the team has any real tarde value. We dont have any real assets, instead we have injury plaugued players who may never reach their potential if they can't stay healthy. You cant get nba assets with nba liabilities.
Without a trade this team will be stuck in the abyss we call mediocrity for the next decade.
Have you been watching the celtics lately? They have won 4 in a row, but you claim we have a bunch of liabilities? I don't know what your watching but Lee Bradley Green Terry Barbosa...yeah I'm not sure I'd call them liabilities.