Celtics vs. Kings

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from ktronic. Show ktronic's posts

    Re: Celtics vs. Kings

    What??? Brad just got ejected with :35 left? When was the first T called?

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from DrBoogiebone. Show DrBoogiebone's posts

    Re: Celtics vs. Kings

    Mark this day in C's history.

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from joepatsfan111111. Show joepatsfan111111's posts

    Re: Celtics vs. Kings

    4th in the lotto.

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from ktronic. Show ktronic's posts

    Re: Celtics vs. Kings

    In response to DrBoogiebone's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Mark this day in C's history.

    [/QUOTE]

    But Cousins didnt get tossed. 

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from DrBoogiebone. Show DrBoogiebone's posts

    Re: Celtics vs. Kings

    In response to ktronic's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to DrBoogiebone's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Mark this day in C's history.

    [/QUOTE]

    But Cousins didnt get tossed. 

    [/QUOTE]

    yeah, go figure. Shows what kind of refs we have.... pathetic.

     
  6. This post has been removed.

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from ktronic. Show ktronic's posts

    Re: Celtics vs. Kings

    In response to DrBoogiebone's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to ktronic's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to DrBoogiebone's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Mark this day in C's history.

    [/QUOTE]

    But Cousins didnt get tossed. 

    [/QUOTE]

    yeah, go figure. Shows what kind of refs we have.... pathetic.

    [/QUOTE]

    Mark Davis. Tommy's BBF

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from ktronic. Show ktronic's posts

    Re: Celtics vs. Kings

    BFF. :-)

     
  9. This post has been removed.

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from ktronic. Show ktronic's posts

    Re: Celtics vs. Kings

    Why on earth is Abby interviewing that numbskull Cousins? Hate when Comcast does this.

     
  11. This post has been removed.

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from ktronic. Show ktronic's posts

    Re: Celtics vs. Kings

    In response to Mployee8's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to ktronic's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    What??? Brad just got ejected with :35 left? When was the first T called?

    [/QUOTE]


    There was no T called ... according to Max he didn't even swear and was tossed for telling the ref how bad he was ... He should have gotten himself tossed when Cousins was allowed to play in the 4th qtr!

    [/QUOTE]

    Agree

     
  13. This post has been removed.

     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from scubber. Show scubber's posts

    Re: Celtics vs. Kings

    In response to Fiercy's comment:

    In response to Mployee8's comment:

    [QUOTE]

     

     

    He's not going anywhere ...

    He just outplayed a Center that 70% of the posters here would love to have on the Celtics. And you said he was too small to play center ... Hump proved you wrong again!

    The C's will keep him around for at least 1-2 years until they develop a prospect or get a Big FA. He only gets traded if another team makes an offer that can't be refused.

     



    Yeah, the Celts just lost to the worst team in the west.

     

    So Hump proved me wrong because the Celts lost?

    Use common sense.

    Hump is just 6-9 and he's already 29 years old.

    Why go over the salary cap to keep Hump?

    [/QUOTE]

    In response to Fiercy's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to Mployee8's comment:

    [QUOTE]

    He's not going anywhere ...

    He just outplayed a Center that 70% of the posters here would love to have on the Celtics. And you said he was too small to play center ... Hump proved you wrong again!

    The C's will keep him around for at least 1-2 years until they develop a prospect or get a Big FA. He only gets traded if another team makes an offer that can't be refused.

    [/QUOTE]

    Yeah, the Celts just lost to the worst team in the west.

    So Hump proved me wrong because the Celts lost?

    Use common sense.

    Hump is just 6-9 and he's already 29 years old.

    Why go over the salary cap to keep Hump?

    [/QUOTE]
    Because he is a better trading chip than AB.  Give AB money to Hump.

     
  15. This post has been removed.

     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from joepatsfan111111. Show joepatsfan111111's posts

    Re: Celtics vs. Kings

    In response to scubber's comment:
    [QUOTE]
    Because he is a better trading chip than AB.  Give AB money to Hump.

    [/QUOTE]

    explain to me that whole premise. a 29yo undersized 4man who has most likely or has reached his ceiling is a better trade chip than a 23yo Avery Bradley who has shown glimpses of being very good and still can get much better?

    Hump's the better chip? at 8 mil a year? nah

     
  17. You have chosen to ignore posts from scubber. Show scubber's posts

    Re: Celtics vs. Kings

    In response to Fiercy's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to scubber's comment:

    [QUOTE]

     

    Because he is a better trading chip than AB.  Give AB money to Hump.

    [/QUOTE]

    So give Hump 7-8m per year and just let AB walk without getting anything in return?

    [/QUOTE]

    Yes.

     
  18. This post has been removed.

     
  19. This post has been removed.

     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from scubber. Show scubber's posts

    Re: Celtics vs. Kings

    Again, because he has better trading value than AB.  Long term, we are not keeping either one.

     
  21. You have chosen to ignore posts from scubber. Show scubber's posts

    Re: Celtics vs. Kings

    In response to Fiercy's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to scubber's comment:

    [QUOTE]

    Yes.

    [/QUOTE]
    hance
    That's your opinion.

    I don't think that will happen because Ainge is not stupid to let AB walk with the Celts getting nothing in return.

    [/QUOTE]

    Maybe not, but I think there is a good chance that Ainge will not match whatever offer AB get.  Just a
     hunch.

     
  22. This post has been removed.

     
  23. You have chosen to ignore posts from chris33. Show chris33's posts

    Re: Celtics vs. Kings

    A terribly refereed game.

    I think it is cool that Brad got tossed.

    The refs should be fired.

     
  24. You have chosen to ignore posts from raider3524. Show raider3524's posts

    Re: Celtics vs. Kings

    In response to Mployee8's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to scubber's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Again, because he has better trading value than AB.  Long term, we are not keeping either one.

    [/QUOTE]


    +1 ... S&T Bradley and keep Hump for 1-2 years tops ... Much better use of cap $ and Hump can play both PF & C ... He just made Cousins look like crap!  If not for some home cooking Cousins is gone early 4th Qtr. Hump has been our best player the last month or two and has Pride & Heart ... He's a keeper for awhile ... even if a short while.

    [/QUOTE]

    this is what i would do...

     
  25. You have chosen to ignore posts from TheBigTicket05. Show TheBigTicket05's posts

    Re: Celtics vs. Kings

    In response to raider3524's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to Mployee8's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to scubber's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Again, because he has better trading value than AB.  Long term, we are not keeping either one.

    [/QUOTE]


    +1 ... S&T Bradley and keep Hump for 1-2 years tops ... Much better use of cap $ and Hump can play both PF & C ... He just made Cousins look like crap!  If not for some home cooking Cousins is gone early 4th Qtr. Hump has been our best player the last month or two and has Pride & Heart ... He's a keeper for awhile ... even if a short while.

    [/QUOTE]

    this is what i would do...

    [/QUOTE]

    me too. hump is a steady player... he could be a trade chip next season

     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share