Conclusion: wilcox as useful as teats on a boar

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from aciemvp. Show aciemvp's posts

    Conclusion: wilcox as useful as teats on a boar

    he's no good unless for extremely short spot duty to run the pants off of a larger sized 5 and he has to get dunks to make that worthwhile, because his rebounding per minute is awful.  great job by danny/doc of getting us 5 talent this year and keeping it.  this would be a different situation if we had darko right now.  there is not way that stinkovic goes for 29 last night.  i'll put it to you that way

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from cabutan. Show cabutan's posts

    Re: Conclusion: wilcox as useful as teats on a boar

    HAAa

     
  3. This post has been removed.

     
  4. This post has been removed.

     
  5. This post has been removed.

     
  6. This post has been removed.

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from jtkl. Show jtkl's posts

    Re: Conclusion: wilcox as useful as teats on a boar

    Darko, is a hall of famer. Every coach he has played for has loved him Acie. Why can't Doc marshall his great talent? 

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from kdp59. Show kdp59's posts

    Re: Conclusion: wilcox as useful as teats on a boar

    In response to Kirk6's comment:

    The Celtics are a +0.6 with Wilcox on the floor.

    The Celtics are a -9.5 with Bass on the floor.

    Tell me who is more worthless.

    http://www.82games.com/1213/1213BOS.HTM



    Bass is a better player than Wilcox...I don;t care what some made up +or_ system says.

    if you really think that Wilcox is a better player, you are watching some other games than the rest of us.

     

    this + and- stuff is garbage stats folks.

     

     

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from kdp59. Show kdp59's posts

    Re: Conclusion: wilcox as useful as teats on a boar

    and Wilcox is who has always been...an under achiever who at one time had NBA starting talent.

     

    he obviously is on the end of his career and has alwasy been wildly inconsistant as a player.

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from concord27. Show concord27's posts

    Re: Conclusion: wilcox as useful as teats on a boar

    In response to Kirk6's comment:

    The Celtics are a +0.6 with Wilcox on the floor.

    The Celtics are a -9.5 with Bass on the floor.

    Tell me who is more worthless.

    http://www.82games.com/1213/1213BOS.HTM




    Kirk the other night you referred to Pekovic as General Zod.  Dead ringer, those who don't remember Superman from the mid-seventies did not appreciate it.

     
  11. This post has been removed.

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from snakeoil123. Show snakeoil123's posts

    Re: Conclusion: wilcox as useful as teats on a boar

    In response to Kirk6's comment:

    In response to kdp59's comment:

     

    In response to Kirk6's comment:

     

    The Celtics are a +0.6 with Wilcox on the floor.

    The Celtics are a -9.5 with Bass on the floor.

    Tell me who is more worthless.

    http://www.82games.com/1213/1213BOS.HTM

     



    Bass is a better player than Wilcox...I don;t care what some made up +or_ system says.

     

    if you really think that Wilcox is a better player, you are watching some other games than the rest of us.

     

    this + and- stuff is garbage stats folks.

     

     

     



    Numbers don't lie. Only posters lie.

     



    Okay then if we are going by numbers...

     

    Terry +4.6 is better than Garnett +4.4 and Randolph at -15.3 is the worst player on the team

     

     
  13. This post has been removed.

     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from BostonTrollSpanker. Show BostonTrollSpanker's posts

    Re: Conclusion: wilcox as useful as teats on a boar

    Unless you've sucked on a boar's teats you have no right to say this. 

    Yum!

     
  15. This post has been removed.

     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from hedleylamarr. Show hedleylamarr's posts

    Re: Conclusion: wilcox as useful as teats on a boar

    In response to BloggetyBloop's comment:

    In response to Fierce34's comment:

     

    The problem with the Celts is they got old.

    5 Atlantic division championships.

    2 trips to the Finals.

    1 championship.

    All that in a span of 5 years.

    It's not like the Celts got KG and Ray when they were still 25 years old.

     



    Too bad the Celtics could not win back to back titles in that 5 year span. I think there is one team that did though.

     

    ROTFLMAO!!!

    Stay blessed!




    2 after this year!

     
  17. This post has been removed.

     
  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from aciemvp. Show aciemvp's posts

    Re: Conclusion: wilcox as useful as teats on a boar

    In response to Kirk6's comment:

    The Celtics are a +0.6 with Wilcox on the floor.

    The Celtics are a -9.5 with Bass on the floor.

    Tell me who is more worthless.

    http://www.82games.com/1213/1213BOS.HTM




    not a big fan of the +/- rabbit hole.  there is no way you can come up with a supposed 5 gathering in 2 or 3 rebs in 20+ minutes and have it be a "+".  lately, even bass has been wiping the glass better than that

     
  19. You have chosen to ignore posts from aciemvp. Show aciemvp's posts

    Re: Conclusion: wilcox as useful as teats on a boar

    In response to snakeoil123's comment:

     

    Bass is a better player than Wilcox...I don;t care what some made up +or_ system says.

     

    if you really think that Wilcox is a better player, you are watching some other games than the rest of us.

     

    this + and- stuff is garbage stats folks.



    Numbers don't lie. Only posters lie.



    Okay then if we are going by numbers...

     

    Terry +4.6 is better than Garnett +4.4 and Randolph at -15.3 is the worst player on the team

     



    thank you.  wilcox's plus/minus being anywhere near positive is thanks to his more effective and more scoring per minute earlier in the season.  that has dried up since we really needed minutes out of him.

     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from aciemvp. Show aciemvp's posts

    Re: Conclusion: wilcox as useful as teats on a boar

    In response to jtkl's comment:

    Darko, is a hall of famer. Every coach he has played for has loved him Acie. Why can't Doc marshall his great talent? 




    riddle me this qui queg- darko has productive pre-season proving that he can still contribute and then __________you fill in the blank_____________ happens rendering him totally unable to play for the celts in the regular season.

     

    i have never said darko was a great player or a great guy.  all we needed was a ham and egger 7 footer and doc iced him out of the country

     
  21. You have chosen to ignore posts from BostonTrollSpanker. Show BostonTrollSpanker's posts

    Re: Conclusion: wilcox as useful as teats on a boar

    " all we needed was a ham and egger 7 footer and doc iced him out of the country"

    Darko asked to leave, his mother is sick. If it was all on Doc and Darko is so valuable why isn't he playing for another NBA team? You're heading into runrunrun territory here. Darko is a head case and one of the biggest busts in NBA history.

    Doc is not the best coach in the league but he is far from the idiot you portray him as. I see this stuff in the Red Sox forum a lot. Some fans find a way to blame a coach for losses but not give them credit for wins. That's ridiculous. 

    I think given our roster our record is just about right. 

     

     
  22. This post has been removed.

     
  23. You have chosen to ignore posts from OneOnOne. Show OneOnOne's posts

    Re: Conclusion: wilcox as useful as teats on a boar

    In response to BostonTrollSpanker's comment:

    " all we needed was a ham and egger 7 footer and doc iced him out of the country"

    Darko asked to leave, his mother is sick. If it was all on Doc and Darko is so valuable why isn't he playing for another NBA team? You're heading into runrunrun territory here. Darko is a head case and one of the biggest busts in NBA history.

    Doc is not the best coach in the league but he is far from the idiot you portray him as. I see this stuff in the Red Sox forum a lot. Some fans find a way to blame a coach for losses but not give them credit for wins. That's ridiculous. 

    I think given our roster our record is just about right. 

     



    Someone actually thinks Doc is a idiot?

     

Share