They could have traded Old man river,concussion,Luke and not given up nothing for that deal.
Old man river= 6 million dollar man
concussion guy = Daniels
Dam we could have had Baron and their number this year
-
Dam we could have had Baron and their number this year
posted at 2/24/2011 9:44 AM EST
- notrade
- Posts: 2275
- First: 1/12/2008
- Last: 2/29/2012
-
Re: Dam we could have had Baron and their number this year
posted at 2/24/2011 9:45 AM EST
- concord27
- Posts: 7707
- First: 6/16/2009
- Last: 6/18/2013
What are you talking about? -
Re: Dam we could have had Baron and their number this year
posted at 2/24/2011 9:48 AM EST
- P34
- Posts: 3719
- First: 8/22/2010
- Last: 3/22/2011
In Response to Dam we could have had Baron and their number this year:They could have traded Old man river,concussion,Luke and not given up nothing for that deal. Old man river= 6 million dollar man concussion guy = Daniels
Posted by notradeWhat are you talking about?Baron Davis' salary this season is 13m and next season it will go up to 13.95m. The Celtics will never take on a contract like that. -
Re: Dam we could have had Baron and their number this year
posted at 2/24/2011 9:50 AM EST
- notrade
- Posts: 2275
- First: 1/12/2008
- Last: 2/29/2012
I would have for a lottery pick,and getting rid of old man river. -
Re: Dam we could have had Baron and their number this year
posted at 2/24/2011 9:53 AM EST
- P34
- Posts: 3719
- First: 8/22/2010
- Last: 3/22/2011
In Response to Re: Dam we could have had Baron and their number this year:I would have for a lottery pick,and getting rid of old man river.
Posted by notradeHow would the Celtics come up with 13m? -
Re: Dam we could have had Baron and their number this year
posted at 2/24/2011 9:59 AM EST
- notrade
- Posts: 2275
- First: 1/12/2008
- Last: 2/29/2012
They only have to come up with 9 to 10 million.
Jermaine = 6
Daniels = 2.2
Luke = 800 or so
Wafer if need be can be throw in too.
They can take on 25 percent more ,then they trade away. -
Re: Dam we could have had Baron and their number this year
posted at 2/24/2011 10:04 AM EST
- P34
- Posts: 3719
- First: 8/22/2010
- Last: 3/22/2011
In Response to Re: Dam we could have had Baron and their number this year:They only have to come up with 9 to 10 million. Jermaine = 6 Daniels = 2.2 Luke = 800 or so Wafer if need be can be throw in too. They can take on 25 percent more ,then they trade away.
Posted by notradeThe trade doesn't work! I tried it on ESPN's trade machine. -
Re: Dam we could have had Baron and their number this year
posted at 2/24/2011 10:29 AM EST
- ChesBay
- Posts: 4
- First: 8/2/2009
- Last: 2/24/2011
In Response to Re: Dam we could have had Baron and their number this year:In Response to Re: Dam we could have had Baron and their number this year : The trade doesn't work! I tried it on ESPN's trade machine.
Posted by P34
Well...actually it would have been JON, Nate, and Luke for Baron + lottery pick. An interesting possibility....but why would the Clips essentially take Nate over Mo Williams???? -
Re: Dam we could have had Baron and their number this year
posted at 2/24/2011 10:30 AM EST
- P34
- Posts: 3719
- First: 8/22/2010
- Last: 3/22/2011
In Response to Re: Dam we could have had Baron and their number this year:In Response to Re: Dam we could have had Baron and their number this year : Well...actually it would have been JON, Nate, and Luke for Baron + lottery pick. An interesting possibility....but why would the Clips essentially take Nate over Mo Williams????
Posted by ChesBayTrue! -
Re: Dam we could have had Baron and their number this year
posted at 2/24/2011 10:33 AM EST
- TPETTEWAY1
- Posts: 175
- First: 6/14/2008
- Last: 6/17/2013
In Response to Dam we could have had Baron and their number this year:They could have traded Old man river,concussion,Luke and not given up nothing for that deal. Old man river= 6 million dollar man concussion guy = Daniels
Posted by notrade
idiot -
Re: Dam we could have had Baron and their number this year
posted at 2/24/2011 11:05 AM EST
- cole-ely
- Posts: 2709
- First: 5/4/2008
- Last: 6/19/2013
Who wants baron davis anyway? That guy's no fit for this team. -
Re: Dam we could have had Baron and their number this year
posted at 2/24/2011 1:54 PM EST
- concord27
- Posts: 7707
- First: 6/16/2009
- Last: 6/18/2013
What does Baron Davis bring to the Celtics at this point? I can't believe what anyone who understands the Celtics thinks Baron Davis at 13 million helps the Celtics in any real way.The ideas for trades have been just plain stupid here the last several days.What about Rondo and Ray for Kobe? I mean really what is the criteria for posting and discussion here. -
Re: Dam we could have had Baron and their number this year
posted at 2/24/2011 2:21 PM EST
- notrade
- Posts: 2275
- First: 1/12/2008
- Last: 2/29/2012
The high lottery pick would add a young player to their old team. Baron would have been a great backup for Rondo and Ray Allen. -
Re: Dam we could have had Baron and their number this year
posted at 2/24/2011 2:31 PM EST
- notrade
- Posts: 2275
- First: 1/12/2008
- Last: 2/29/2012
In Response to Re: Dam we could have had Baron and their number this year:Yeah. Clippers will just trade players away for nothing in return and on top of that Ainge wants Baron's contract? That is nothing but fail all the way around.
Posted by tompenny
They didn't want Mo and Moon. They only wanted to get rid of Baron's contract.