Faverani is already better than Asik

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from celticsince1958. Show celticsince1958's posts

    Faverani is already better than Asik

    Why get Asik?? Skip Asik please.

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from debrit. Show debrit's posts

    Re: Faverani is already better than Asik

    In response to celticsince1958's comment:

    Why get Asik?? Skip Asik please.



    No,no,no.Paverani is not better than Asik.The brazilian has upside,could became a very good player,give him time.No pressure,please.

     

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from celticsince1958. Show celticsince1958's posts

    Re: Faverani is already better than Asik

    In response to debrit's comment:

    In response to celticsince1958's comment:

    Why get Asik?? Skip Asik please.



    No,no,no.Paverani is not better than Asik.The brazilian has upside,could became a very good player,give him time.No pressure,please.

    Check all the stats of both centers based on equal playing time.

     




     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from celticsince1958. Show celticsince1958's posts

    Re: Faverani is already better than Asik

    In response to debrit's comment:

    In response to celticsince1958's comment:

    Why get Asik?? Skip Asik please.



    No,no,no.Paverani is not better than Asik.The brazilian has upside,could became a very good player,give him time.No pressure,please.

     



    Check all the stats of both centers based on equal playing time.

     
  5. This post has been removed.

     
  6. This post has been removed.

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from celticsince1958. Show celticsince1958's posts

    Re: Faverani is already better than Asik

    In response to Fierce34's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Just use common sense.

    If the Celts got Asik, he would start alongside Sully.

    So why would Asik start and Fav does not start for the Celts?

    [/QUOTE

    Check all the stats of both centers based on equal playing time.

    Then we can discuss the Faverinai/Asik issue. Also our new coach is tanking for sure. Either that or he does not have a clue.

     

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from R9R. Show R9R's posts

    Re: Faverani is already better than Asik

    In response to Fierce34's comment:

    Just use common sense.

    If the Celts got Asik, he would start alongside Sully.

    So why would Asik start and Fav does not start for the Celts?



    Thats a good question...

    I guess Bass>Fav

    Id like to see Fav and Hump to come in and provide more off the bench

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from cabutan. Show cabutan's posts

    Re: Faverani is already better than Asik

    Fav could catch a Rondo pass...asik couldnt...am glad asik deal didn't go thru...he is junk...

     
  10. This post has been removed.

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from cabutan. Show cabutan's posts

    Re: Faverani is already better than Asik

    You think asik would school hibbert? Haaaaaa listen, hibert is at the top of nba center, no comparison...asik would do no different and thats a fact 

     
  12. This post has been removed.

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from wozzy. Show wozzy's posts

    Re: Faverani is already better than Asik

    In response to Fierce34's comment:

    Just use common sense.

    If the Celts got Asik, he would start alongside Sully.

    So why would Asik start and Fav does not start for the Celts?



    Asik would start if traded to the C's because he has one year left on his contract genius and he's getting paid through the nose, also the same reason Bass, Lee, Hump, Bradley and Wallace are getting max minutes, because some contending team will think they can help and will trade for them and/or their expiring contracts.  The only goal for the Celtics is to get better, this isn't mutually exclusive with winning games or starting the players of the future.

    Close your pie hole long enough to learn the game, nothing worse than a blabbering know nothing.

     
  14. This post has been removed.

     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from wozzy. Show wozzy's posts

    Re: Faverani is already better than Asik

    In response to Fierce34's comment:

    The reason Asik would start is he's simply better than Fav.

    Right now Fav is only averaging 4.8 ppg, 3.9 rpg, and 0.9 bpg.

    Not exactly starting Center numbers.

    You don't have to be genius to figure that out.



    Fav plays three minutes less per game than Asik; scores more points, has more steals, has more blocks, has more assists, shoots threes...

     

    Yeah he's better, learn the game.

     
  16. This post has been removed.

     
  17. This post has been removed.

     
  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from wozzy. Show wozzy's posts

    Re: Faverani is already better than Asik

    Just the facts ma'am, just the facts...

     
  19. This post has been removed.

     
  20. This post has been removed.

     
  21. This post has been removed.

     
  22. You have chosen to ignore posts from rameakap. Show rameakap's posts

    Re: Faverani is already better than Asik

    Faverani is the kind of big who would be perfect for a backup/enforcer role in Houston playing behind Dwight.

    Asik is the perfect rim protecting starting big to play 26-30 mins a game and be subbed out late in an offense/defense move for a guy like Olynyk due to Ft shooting.

    When I said the Celtics would be 40-45 game winner this year had they made the Asik trade, it wasn't just the one player being worth 20+ wins. The team was 10-12 at the time and the entire culture of the season would have changed. 

    There would have been no tanking, Rondo sitting out back to backs, Ainge would have followed with another trade by the deadline and so on.

    Still a good offseason target, Humphries in a sign and trade + Fav... in my opinion.

     
  23. You have chosen to ignore posts from hedleylamar. Show hedleylamar's posts

    Re: Faverani is already better than Asik


    Why do we Celtic fans limit ourselves to discussing scrubs. Neither one of these guys is going to lead us to the promised land.

     
  24. You have chosen to ignore posts from docc. Show docc's posts

    Re: Faverani is already better than Asik

       Faverani isn't a legit center.   He's more a pf.   Basically the Cs have 4pfs in
    Sully, Fav, Kelly, and Humphries.   Will DA get it correct and keep the best 2?   Humphries salary may have some play, but Sully's contract is up after ? 2 more seasons.   JG is only good offensively in 1 of 10 games and he isn't reliable to be a good supporting player in the other games.   I'd rather have Humphries with other good players (and his salary) than JG.   What do other GMs think about it not being a good draft?   If they think not, then would they want to trade a pick for JG (of course it'd be more complicated w/ JGs salary).   Their are many draftees in top 15 who could contribute to building a good team than JG.   REMEMBER: I first mention that JG wasn't a player when I saw him play 2 games for the Cs.   I can just tell be how someone moves on the court.   Good players don't have 2 bad games in a row esp if you play w/ a PP and KG and RR, ie good players.

     
  25. You have chosen to ignore posts from BostonTrollSpanker. Show BostonTrollSpanker's posts

    Re: Faverani is already better than Asik

    Can we start a Gortat thread too? He whipped us the other night.

     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share