Gordon Heyward: Less Efficient than the Big Dig

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from chris33. Show chris33's posts

    Re: Gordon Heyward: Less Efficient than the Big Dig

    I'd like to see Rondo, Crawford, and Green play together, but I think Rondo will be traded at some point, because he is too expensive for a point guard not named Chris Paul.

     
  2. This post has been removed.

     
  3. This post has been removed.

     
  4. This post has been removed.

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from hedleylamarr. Show hedleylamarr's posts

    Re: Gordon Heyward: Less Efficient than the Big Dig

    http://www.nba.com/advancedstats/player-vs-player.html#Avery-Bradley-vs-Gordon-Hayward|202340,202330;year=201213;season=r

     

    Bradley has peaked.  Hayward has improved every year.

    Bradley is 6'2"

    Hayward is 6'8"

    If they both want the same money, shouldn't you go for the one who's "marginally" better?  (which is a matter of opinion, btw!)

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from TheBigTicket05. Show TheBigTicket05's posts

    Re: Gordon Heyward: Less Efficient than the Big Dig

    In response to Fierce34's comment:

    Would guys prefer swapping Bradley with Hayward and paying Hayward 8m per year?



    if they are at the same price.. yes, i would

     
  7. This post has been removed.

     
  8. This post has been removed.

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from TheBigTicket05. Show TheBigTicket05's posts

    Re: Gordon Heyward: Less Efficient than the Big Dig

    In response to Fierce34's comment:

    In response to hedleylamarr's comment:

     

    http://www.nba.com/advancedstats/player-vs-player.html#Avery-Bradley-vs-Gordon-Hayward|202340,202330;year=201213;season=r

     

    Bradley has peaked.  Hayward has improved every year.

    Bradley is 6'2"

    Hayward is 6'8"

    If they both want the same money, shouldn't you go for the one who's "marginally" better?  (which is a matter of opinion, btw!)

     



    I disagree that Bradley has peaked.

     

    He's just 23 years old.



    hayward is also 23 years old though.

    sorry fierce this time i with hedleylamarr.

    if only he can be a effecttive pg why not? but his ball handling is terrible.

    if he plays like a young jason terry or joe dumars, then he is a keeper

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from TheBigTicket05. Show TheBigTicket05's posts

    Re: Gordon Heyward: Less Efficient than the Big Dig

    In response to Fierce34's comment:

    In response to TheBigTicket05's comment:

     

     

    if they are at the same price.. yes, i would

     



    Agree.

     

    If Bradley and Hayward would both cost 8m per year, Hayward has the advantage because he's bigger.

    The question is would Utah want a sign and trade with Boston for Bradley?

     

    I don't think we can get Hayward as a RFA if we don't overpay.



    i dont think so. 

     
  11. This post has been removed.

     
  12. This post has been removed.

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from TheBigTicket05. Show TheBigTicket05's posts

    Re: Gordon Heyward: Less Efficient than the Big Dig

    In response to Fierce34's comment:

    In response to TheBigTicket05's comment:

     

     

    hayward is also 23 years old though.

    sorry fierce this time i with hedleylamarr.

    if only he can be a effecttive pg why not? but his ball handling is terrible.

    if he plays like a young jason terry or joe dumars, then he is a keeper

     



    Like I said, if can sign and trade Bradley for Hayward then I'm all for it.

     

    But if Utah doesn't want Bradley then we'd have to overpay for Hayward.

    That means we'd have to offer Hayward around 10-12m per year so that Utah will not match.



    i get it. 

     
  14. This post has been removed.

     
  15. This post has been removed.

     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share