Re: Green Thunderous Dunk.....sweet
posted at 1/28/2013 8:48 AM EST
In response to Karllost's comment:
In response to snakeoil123's comment:
In response to Karllost's comment:
In response to snakeoil123's comment:
In response to Karllost's comment:
In response to snakeoil123's comment:
In response to Karllost's comment:
In response to snakeoil123's comment:
Yeah, that 11 points 4 rebounds and 0 assists in 42 minutes were awe inspiring.
Thanks for shining a 5,000 watt spotlight on your basketball IQ.
Oh what a cute insult.
He played great D.
He was not strong on offense, rebounded poorly and had o assists in 42 minutes.
Enlighten me on what you disagree with basketball genius.
Some reason you left He played great D out of your original assessment of Greens game?
That was by far the best and most important attribute to his game yesterday, giving Lebron difficulty getting the shots he wanted.. especially down the stretch and OT.. 11 points isnt bad (11% of teams total) on 50% shooting...
it was a tough, grind out game where only one team scored 100 pts after 2 OT's and JG shot 50%, only 2 others on the C's shot any better...
But youre still missing the point.. JG's defense was clearly the attention getter and you didnt even notice it in your original analysis
For some reason you didn't notice that this thread was about a dunk. Not about his Defense. Then for some reason you said I didn't know anything about basketball because I mentioned Green did next to nothing on offense or on the boards.
This thread wasn't about his D. I was responding to the OP about what a "great dunk" Green had.
You missed the point of the thread. Not me.
If the thread was about JG's dunk... then why did you post about his stat line??
Let me know your rationale on this after telling me my post isnt about his dunk
Also, my post was in response to yours,, ya know, the one mentioning (sarcastically) how awe inspiring JG's stat line was
That's kind of easy. A dunk is not important. it's just two points. The thread was about how great JG's dunk was and then mentioned how he should be playing more.
So I posted his stat line to (sarcastically) show that dunk or not he didn't show up on offense or the boards.
then you called me stupid because I posted his stat line.
You up to speed yet?
Go back and read the original post. You know...about a dunk.
First off I didnt call you stupid, nice try at making up bs to get sympathy.. thats pathetic..
Second, if you posted his stat line to show he didnt show up offensively or on the boards (in your opinion) , then why did you leave out his great defensive play??? Maybe you just didnt notice
Sympathy? Are you kidding? Who am i trying to get sympathy from? You're pathetic.
What don't you get? THe OP was about his offense. I was responding to the OP.
Which was about his offense. Which is what I was responding to.
I can say it 8 more times if you want.
If the thread was about his D I wouldn't have put up his stat line. Because then it would have been about his D.
Since it was about a dunk (which is actually a shot that is taken on offense) I put up his stat line.
If you look at the thread above me only one guy mentioned his D and that guy posted at the same time I did.
Get it?
Wow.