Re: I Thought Moore is Already Ahead of Bradley?
posted at 1/1/2012 9:47 PM EST
- Fiercest34
- Posts: 15670
- First: 3/24/2011
- Last: 4/27/2013
In Response to
Re: I Thought Moore is Already Ahead of Bradley?:
Someone here thinks we should trade Rondo for Gasol
Posted by Mployee8
That's plausible. Remember, the Lakers desperately need a PG and the Celtics need another big man that can rebound and score inside the paint.
Bradley on the other hand has more fouls than points. Any GM out there stupid enough to want a bad player like that?
Ugh!
Re: I Thought Moore is Already Ahead of Bradley?
posted at 1/1/2012 10:07 PM EST
- Mployee8
- Posts: 5990
- First: 7/8/2008
- Last: 5/20/2013
Somewhere ... yes!
But doubt we could replace Cousy ... err I mean Rondo.
Re: I Thought Moore is Already Ahead of Bradley?
posted at 1/1/2012 10:10 PM EST
- Fiercest34
- Posts: 15670
- First: 3/24/2011
- Last: 4/27/2013
In Response to
Re: I Thought Moore is Already Ahead of Bradley?:
Somewhere ... yes! But doubt we could replace Cousy ... err I mean Rondo.
Posted by Mployee8
How about we bet on Bradley being traded for a 2nd round pick?
Re: I Thought Moore is Already Ahead of Bradley?
posted at 1/1/2012 10:11 PM EST
- Mployee8
- Posts: 5990
- First: 7/8/2008
- Last: 5/20/2013
Already told you ... Danny could have too much man-love for the guard so risk/reward in a bet is not palatable. But I'll take you up on Gasol for Rondo.
Re: I Thought Moore is Already Ahead of Bradley?
posted at 1/1/2012 10:21 PM EST
- Fiercest34
- Posts: 15670
- First: 3/24/2011
- Last: 4/27/2013
In Response to
Re: I Thought Moore is Already Ahead of Bradley?:
Already told you ... Danny could have too much man-love for the guard so risk/reward in a bet is not palatable. But I'll take you up on Gasol for Rondo.
Posted by Mployee8
I'm not insisting on a Rondo for Gasol trade. All I'm saying is it's plausible because the Lakers need a PG and the Celts need a big.
Bradley for a 2nd round pick on the other hand is close to impossible!
Re: I Thought Moore is Already Ahead of Bradley?
posted at 1/1/2012 10:30 PM EST
Danny should trade Bradley and JON for Cousins and then use Cousins as trade material to get Howard. Wait, Cousins couldn't be traded twice, could he? So, Danny should move Bradley and JON (expiring contract) + picks in a three way deal that gets Howard to C's while Orlando gets Cousins and Sac gets a couple of players.
Cousins is a talented head case but maybe he and Bradley can be usefully packaged to get Howard to the C's?
Then, with the cap room at end of the season, convince Deron Williams to come and join his buddy Howard as shooting guard to replace Ray.
PG - Rondo
SG - DWill (Ray as backup at reduced salary)
SF - Paul (Green/Pietrus as backups)
PF - Bass (Green, maybe KG as backups)
C - Howard (Steimsma as backup)
I like it!
Re: I Thought Moore is Already Ahead of Bradley?
posted at 1/1/2012 10:36 PM EST
- Fiercest34
- Posts: 15670
- First: 3/24/2011
- Last: 4/27/2013
In Response to
Re: I Thought Moore is Already Ahead of Bradley?:
Danny should trade Bradley and JON for Cousins and then use Cousins as trade material to get Howard. Wait, Cousins couldn't be traded twice, could he? So, Danny should move Bradley and JON (expiring contract) + picks in a three way deal that gets Howard to C's while Orlando gets Cousins and Sac gets a couple of players. Cousins is a talented head case but maybe he and Bradley can be usefully packaged to get Howard to the C's? Then, with the cap room at end of the season, convince Deron Williams to come and join his buddy Howard as shooting guard to replace Ray. PG - Rondo SG - DWill (Ray as backup at reduced salary) SF - Paul (Green/Pietrus as backups) PF - Bass (Green, maybe KG as backups) C - Howard (Steimsma as backup) I like it!
Posted by Celtsfan4life
No way! I'm sorry but as bad an attitude as Cousins has, no way the Kings will just trade him for JO, Bradley, and picks.
And JO and Bradley's outgoing salary will just be 8m, DH will have an incoming salary of 18m.
Re: I Thought Moore is Already Ahead of Bradley?
posted at 1/1/2012 10:40 PM EST
So we ship out some additional salary - Wilcox and Sasha, for example.
Re: I Thought Moore is Already Ahead of Bradley?
posted at 1/1/2012 10:45 PM EST
Wilcox and our 2 number 1's for Cousins. It's tough because he doesn't make a lot of money, relatively speaking. They MAY (it's PLAUSIBLE...LOL) they want a replacement for him, and would take two picks. I think DA should investigate.....we'd then have our replacement for KG, get Nick Young, and we will right back in the hunt next year
Rondo/Dooling
Young/Ray (Moore traded)
PP/Green
Bass/KG
Cousins/Steamer
Not bad, guys!!
Re: I Thought Moore is Already Ahead of Bradley?
posted at 1/1/2012 10:46 PM EST
- Mployee8
- Posts: 5990
- First: 7/8/2008
- Last: 5/20/2013
In Response to
Re: I Thought Moore is Already Ahead of Bradley?:
In Response to Re: I Thought Moore is Already Ahead of Bradley? : I'm not insisting on a Rondo for Gasol trade. All I'm saying is it's plausible because the Lakers need a PG and the Celts need a big. Bradley for a 2nd round pick on the other hand is close to impossible!
Posted by Fiercest34
So lets bet on Gasol for Rondo ... You've been posting that for weeks ... Put your $ where your mouth is ... LOL
Re: I Thought Moore is Already Ahead of Bradley?
posted at 1/1/2012 10:48 PM EST
In Response to
Re: I Thought Moore is Already Ahead of Bradley?:
In Response to Re: I Thought Moore is Already Ahead of Bradley? : So lets bet on Gasol for Rondo ... You've but posting that for weeks ... Put your $ where your mouth is ... LOL
Posted by Mployee8
They aren't trading Gasol and we are not trading Rondo. It's a bet for losers!!
Re: I Thought Moore is Already Ahead of Bradley?
posted at 1/1/2012 10:54 PM EST
- Mployee8
- Posts: 5990
- First: 7/8/2008
- Last: 5/20/2013
In Response to
Re: I Thought Moore is Already Ahead of Bradley?:
In Response to Re: I Thought Moore is Already Ahead of Bradley? : They aren't trading Gasol and we are not trading Rondo. It's a bet for losers!!
Posted by Red-16Russ-11
Mind your own business! I'm talking with Fierce not some guy with holes in the knees of his pants.
Re: I Thought Moore is Already Ahead of Bradley?
posted at 1/1/2012 10:56 PM EST
In Response to
Re: I Thought Moore is Already Ahead of Bradley?:
In Response to Re: I Thought Moore is Already Ahead of Bradley? : Mind your own business! I'm talking with Fierce not some guy with holes in the knees of his pants.
Posted by Mployee8
Talking to yourself. My shirt costs more than your whole outfit, so it can't be me!!
Re: I Thought Moore is Already Ahead of Bradley?
posted at 1/1/2012 11:02 PM EST
- jdm894g
- Posts: 2163
- First: 1/6/2009
- Last: 5/18/2013
In Response to
Re: I Thought Moore is Already Ahead of Bradley?:
In Response to Re: I Thought Moore is Already Ahead of Bradley? : They aren't trading Gasol and we are not trading Rondo. It's a bet for losers!!
Posted by Red-16Russ-11
Im tired of reading it!!!! The FAKERS & Celtics would/will never trade star players to help each other. It's a fantasy for some armchair GMs on message boards.
Re: I Thought Moore is Already Ahead of Bradley?
posted at 1/1/2012 11:04 PM EST
- Mployee8
- Posts: 5990
- First: 7/8/2008
- Last: 5/20/2013
In Response to
Re: I Thought Moore is Already Ahead of Bradley?:
In Response to Re: I Thought Moore is Already Ahead of Bradley? : Talking to yourself. My shirt costs more than your whole outfit, so it can't be me!!
Posted by Red-16Russ-11
Obvious that you don't want to go head to head with me as my kneehole remark got past you ...
Re: I Thought Moore is Already Ahead of Bradley?
posted at 1/1/2012 11:04 PM EST
In Response to
Re: I Thought Moore is Already Ahead of Bradley?:
In Response to Re: I Thought Moore is Already Ahead of Bradley? : Im tired of reading it!!!! The FAKERS & Celtics would/will never trade star players to help each other. It's a fantasy for some armchair GMs on message boards.
Posted by jdm894g
Exactly. Not even in a 3 team trade would Danny do business with Kupcake!
Re: I Thought Moore is Already Ahead of Bradley?
posted at 1/1/2012 11:11 PM EST
- Mployee8
- Posts: 5990
- First: 7/8/2008
- Last: 5/20/2013
Agreed to that ... When you gonna convince your buddy Fierce to forgeddaboudette?
Re: I Thought Moore is Already Ahead of Bradley?
posted at 1/1/2012 11:12 PM EST
In Response to
Re: I Thought Moore is Already Ahead of Bradley?:
Agreed to that ... When you gonna convince your buddy Fierce to forgeddaboudette?
Posted by Mployee8
He is his own man, with his own opinions...just like you and me. He doesn't take himself quite as seriously as you..............and that's why I like his posts.
Sorry, just telling it like it is!!
Re: I Thought Moore is Already Ahead of Bradley?
posted at 1/1/2012 11:36 PM EST
- Mployee8
- Posts: 5990
- First: 7/8/2008
- Last: 5/20/2013
And for that you turn a blind eye to the rest of his nonsense ...
Re: I Thought Moore is Already Ahead of Bradley?
posted at 1/1/2012 11:45 PM EST
- Fiercest34
- Posts: 15670
- First: 3/24/2011
- Last: 4/27/2013
In Response to
Re: I Thought Moore is Already Ahead of Bradley?:
And for that you turn a blind eye to the rest of his nonsense ...
Posted by Mployee8
You really are crazy! You attack him on another thread and you expect him to be your friend on this thread? Ha Ha
Re: I Thought Moore is Already Ahead of Bradley?
posted at 1/1/2012 11:48 PM EST
- Mployee8
- Posts: 5990
- First: 7/8/2008
- Last: 5/20/2013
What makes you think I'm looking for friendship? Like I'm here 24/7 like some others ....
Re: I Thought Moore is Already Ahead of Bradley?
posted at 1/1/2012 11:49 PM EST
- Fiercest34
- Posts: 15670
- First: 3/24/2011
- Last: 4/27/2013
Guys, I don't think we can trade Wilcox yet.
83. When can a team trade a free agent it signs? Do they have to keep him forever?
Generally, a player cannot be traded until three months after signing a contract or December 15th of that season, whichever is later. This does not apply to draft picks, who can be traded 30 days after signing their contract. In addition, if the player is playing under a one-year contract and will have Larry Bird or Early Bird rights at the end of the contract, he can't be traded without his consent. If consent is granted and the player is traded, then he loses his Larry Bird or Early Bird rights, and enters free agency as a Non-Bird free agent. For example, Seattle signed Vladimir Radmanovic to a one-year qualifying offer on September 21, 2005. Therefore, Radmanovic could not be traded at all until December 21, 2005. After December 21, 2005, he could only be traded if he consented to the trade (he did consent and was traded to the Clippers). He became a Non-Bird free agent with the Clippers in the summer of 2006 (and signed instead with the Lakers).
Re: I Thought Moore is Already Ahead of Bradley?
posted at 1/2/2012 8:29 AM EST
- painter
- Posts: 887
- First: 5/22/2007
- Last: 5/20/2013
Is this Danny saying goodbye to Avery Bradley?
