I told you I wasn't worried about Steve Blake,and Farmar was better.
-
I told you I wasn't worried about Steve Blake,and Farmar was better.
posted at 2/22/2011 7:35 PM EST
Blake has done virtually nothing for the Lakers. -
Re: I told you I wasn't worried about Steve Blake,and Farmar was better.
posted at 2/22/2011 7:44 PM EST
In Response to I told you I wasn't worried about Steve Blake,and Farmar was better.:Blake has done virtually nothing for the Lakers.
Posted by notrade
Did you really tell us that? I'd love to see that post, because I honestly can't imagine anyone foreseeing Blake being a worse fit with the Lakers than Farmar.Regardless, at this point I have to say I agree with your statement. Hopefully he finds a way to contribute more to the team the second half of the season. -
Re: I told you I wasn't worried about Steve Blake,and Farmar was better.
posted at 2/22/2011 7:49 PM EST
I said it,when many on this board thought it was an upgrade. -
Re: I told you I wasn't worried about Steve Blake,and Farmar was better.
posted at 2/23/2011 1:04 AM EST
I'd say they're actually about even. blake's stats don't leap off the page, but offensively I still believe he's a better player than farmar.it's easy to put up better stats on a bad teamwhere blake is costing them is defensively, and so the lakers have lost a bit of their defensive identity from last season -
This post has been removed.
-
Re: I told you I wasn't worried about Steve Blake,and Farmar was better.
posted at 2/23/2011 10:31 AM EST
In Response to Re: I told you I wasn't worried about Steve Blake,and Farmar was better.:In Response to I told you I wasn't worried about Steve Blake,and Farmar was better. : Did you really tell us that? I'd love to see that post, because I honestly can't imagine anyone foreseeing Blake being a worse fit with the Lakers than Farmar. Regardless, at this point I have to say I agree with your statement. Hopefully he finds a way to contribute more to the team the second half of the season.
Posted by FlobusMcNugget
I am not sure what he said, but I guarantee you I said it. The only ones that thought it was a upgrade basically were the Lakers fans. -
Re: I told you I wasn't worried about Steve Blake,and Farmar was better.
posted at 2/23/2011 10:40 AM EST
I thought blake was better than he's turned out to be. he was pretty good in Denver and was it Portland?
For the lakers, I definitely think farmar was better. -
Re: I told you I wasn't worried about Steve Blake,and Farmar was better.
posted at 2/23/2011 12:04 PM EST
In Response to Re: I told you I wasn't worried about Steve Blake,and Farmar was better.:I love seeing Vujachick and Farmar waste away in NJ. The best thing Sharipova can hope for there is the sopranos tour and atlantic city. Hahahahahahahaha.
Posted by DFURY13VujacicNJ - 26.7 MPG, 11.0 PPG, 2.1 APG, 3.2 RPGLAL - 4.9 MPG, 1.8 PPG, 0.5 APG, 0.4 RPGFarmarNJ - 23.9 MPG, 9.4 PPG, 4.4 APG, 2.2 RPGLAL - 18.0 MPG, 7.2 PPG, 1.5 APG, 1.6 RPGYou call this "wasting away"? Looks like a decent move for both of them to me. -
Re: I told you I wasn't worried about Steve Blake,and Farmar was better.
posted at 2/23/2011 12:21 PM EST
I said when they signed Blake that Farmar was better. Farmar wanted to be a starter, and whined about it. So they shipped him out. And while their NUMBERS may be better in NJ, I believe Fury meant they are not on a playoff team anymore, so they are "wasting away" in East Rutherford, NJ.
Sasha will never again see the kind of money he's making now, even if his numbers continue to go up. 11 PPG on the NETS!!! WOW!!
And with DWill now in the fold, looks like old Jordy will never be a starter. -
Re: I told you I wasn't worried about Steve Blake,and Farmar was better.
posted at 2/23/2011 12:34 PM EST
I remember, Notrade and hedley saying it, and i definately said it!!!