if we can't find love

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from kaktug. Show kaktug's posts

    if we can't find love

    green to Utah for Hayward. 


     


    bass and hump to Houston for asik. 


     


    trade down to get another 1st rounder. 


     


    rondo-Bradley-Hayward-sully-asik. 


     


    oly is the 6th man. 


     


    draft the Croatian big man. 


     


    draft a shooter at the SF in hood. 


     


    draft a backup PG like Napier. 

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from rameakap. Show rameakap's posts

    Re: if we can't find love

    Decent plan. I don't like Hood at all though.

    “The commercial class has always mistrusted verbal brilliancy and wit, deeming such qualities, perhaps with some justice, frivolous and unprofitable.”

    - Red Auerbach

     
  3. This post has been removed.

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from rameakap. Show rameakap's posts

    Re: if we can't find love

    Two first round picks for Gordon Hayward is more than fair.

    Duh.

    There are posters here who would practically give Green away for free.

    I bet this board would be split 50-50 on whether to give pick 17 and the Clippers pick away for Gordon Hayward. It is more than fair value. Joel Anthony is obviously $ filler.

    You have been proven wrong on this trade idea being bad value for MONTHS now, yet you keep bringing it up and laughing like a baboon at it. Why? glutton for punishment? You just look idiotic. The trade is a perfectly legit one that is fair to both teams.

     
  5. This post has been removed.

     
  6. This post has been removed.

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from rameakap. Show rameakap's posts

    Re: if we can't find love

    I never made a prediction psychopath

    Just like I never predicted Rondo for McLemore and pick 8 or for Love to come here.

    I simply state trade ideas that are fair value for both sides. All trade proposals have an unlikely chance of happening. Their simply are not that many made compared to how many fair ideas arm-chair GM's can come up with.

    The bets I offered you were that Rondo would not be traded on draft night, after you continue to predict he will be, and that Humphries could return to Boston or be used in a sign and trade, after you predicted he 100% will not be. 

    Fiercy the coward refused to bet.

    Typical.

    We know you'd refuse to honor one even if you did bet and lose anyhow welcher, so what is the point?

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from rameakap. Show rameakap's posts

    Re: if we can't find love

    Fiercy, yup you really are this stupid.

    Saying Hayward for picks is a laughable terrible trade idea that is lopsided and rediculous is where you were wrong.

    Duh

    It was never about a prediction, I NEVER predicted it would happen.

    I said it was fair

    You said it was not

    Utah was rumored to be shopping Hayward for ONE 2014 pick

    You were WRONG

    Get over it

     
  9. This post has been removed.

     
  10. This post has been removed.

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from jgallag1. Show jgallag1's posts

    Re: if we can't find love

    I agree with Rame that two first rounders and Anthony is more than fair value for Hayward. I agree with Fierce that it won't (and shouldn't) happen. The problem is it's overpaying. Can we all just get along and never bring up this subject from MONTHS ago now?

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from mellymel3. Show mellymel3's posts

    Re: if we can't find love

    In response to jgallag1's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    I agree with Rame that two first rounders and Anthony is more than fair value for Hayward. I agree with Fierce that it won't (and shouldn't) happen. The problem is it's overpaying. Can we all just get along and never bring up this subject from MONTHS ago now?

    [/QUOTE]

    +1

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from Kingface12. Show Kingface12's posts

    Re: if we can't find love

    In response to Fiercy's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    It's simple, rame, if you don't want to bet, just say you don't want to.

    Why are you so defensive?

     

    I challenge you to a bet and your excuse for not accepting is you accuse me of being a welcher.

    But you contradicted yourself because you challenged me to a bet regarding Rondo getting traded on draft night last month.

    So when you challenge me to a bet I'm not a welcher.

    But if I challenge you to a bet I'm a welcher.

    You're the poster boy for the word "contradiction".

    HAHAHA

    [/QUOTE]


    Just an observation.....you have posted 3,500 times in 5 months......  nerd.

    "HAHAHA"

     
  14. This post has been removed.

     

Share