It's Official ... The Celtics are Too Good to Tank (Tankapalooza is Over!)

  1. This post has been removed.

     
  2. This post has been removed.

     
  3. This post has been removed.

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from CeltsFanInNH. Show CeltsFanInNH's posts

    Re: It's Official ... The Celtics are Too Good to Tank (Tankapalooza is Over!)

    In response to Mployee8's comment:

    Unfortunately Danny was trying to buy from a renegger ... we all know to deal with a renegger you must "flush" them out first, right?

    Your only tradable that got dumped was Lee ... LOL!!!

    And that backfired cuz we are better off with Bayless and save $ ... Hahaha

    The team was poorly constructed when the season began and little has changed to improve it ... little has changed to make them any worse either otherwise we wouldn't be better than Orlando, Philly, Milwaukee & Utah. The record we end up with is probably gonna be worse than they deserve but that can be chalked up to good planning by Danny with Brad executing Danny's plan as a good subordinate does especially when being well compensated under the circumstances.



    That's why people were calling it Tankapalooza. It was quite obvious the Cs were headed that way. The new rules make it tougher for GMs to trade bad players and salary. The Cs have plenty of both. There will most likely be another season of it next year too. 

     
  5. This post has been removed.

     
  6. This post has been removed.

     
  7. This post has been removed.

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from vtfanofcs. Show vtfanofcs's posts

    Re: It's Official ... The Celtics are Too Good to Tank (Tankapalooza is Over!)

    In response to Fiercy's comment:

    It's official?

    Celts too good to tank?

     

    After Lee and Crawford got traded and Rondo and Bayless took over, the Celts are just 10-30.

    Celts were 13-21 before Lee and Crawford got traded.

     

    Obviously the Celts are not too good to tank.

    Proof of this is the Celts are in the hunt for a top 4 or top 5 pick in the 2014 Draft.



     You keep saying the same thing.  So, it is not an accident.  Either you are lying or you can explain how the Celtics were 13-21 "before LEE AND CRAWFORD got traded."

     
  9. This post has been removed.

     
  10. This post has been removed.

     
  11. This post has been removed.

     
  12. This post has been removed.

     
  13. This post has been removed.

     
  14. This post has been removed.

     
  15. This post has been removed.

     
  16. This post has been removed.

     
  17. This post has been removed.

     
  18. This post has been removed.

     
  19. This post has been removed.

     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from CeltsFanInNH. Show CeltsFanInNH's posts

    Re: It's Official ... The Celtics are Too Good to Tank (Tankapalooza is Over!)

    The Cs have a worse record playing Hump more minutes than early on. He's been their most effective and hardest working player all season long. 

    Whats their record with Rondo than without Rondo? 

     

    The good news is only 6 more games. Then we are halfway there. 

     
  21. You have chosen to ignore posts from OneOnOne. Show OneOnOne's posts

    Re: It's Official ... The Celtics are Too Good to Tank (Tankapalooza is Over!)

    why are there so many posts removed from this thread?

     
  22. You have chosen to ignore posts from mellymel3. Show mellymel3's posts

    Re: It's Official ... The Celtics are Too Good to Tank (Tankapalooza is Over!)

    The C's should now adopt the Chicago method of voting...

    Tank early, tank often, tank in the morning, the afternoon and the evening...tank by land, by sea and in the air...just get on with the tanking...lets go 0 fer 6!

     
  23. This post has been removed.

     
  24. This post has been removed.

     
  25. This post has been removed.

     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share