Jeff Green is not good at the 4

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from Ortiz123. Show Ortiz123's posts

    Re: Jeff Green is not good at the 4

    In response to Kirk6's comment:

    In response to rameakap's comment:

     

    FACTS WE KNEW:

    1. Green gave up more than he was giving when playing at the 4

    2. SF seemed his most natural position

    3. He was still growing as a player and could get better at both positions

    4. He is NOT a SG

     




    Green would be best at the 2.

     

    He could defend the 2 and he would overpower other 2s.

    Do you really think Lee and Terry are better than Green?




    When he can handle and shoot like PP, Koby, or Lebrains, then he can play the two..

    But then, he still will be better at the three...

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from Ortiz123. Show Ortiz123's posts

    Re: Jeff Green is not good at the 4

    In response to rameakap's comment:

    So we have Golden State next... Green on Steph Curry right?




    like to see that..on second thought..nooooooooo!

     
  3. This post has been removed.

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from snakeoil123. Show snakeoil123's posts

    Re: Jeff Green is not good at the 4

    K cool kirk

    Green will be the first 6 9 guard who has never played guard in the history of the NBA.

    We all agree with you.

     
  5. This post has been removed.

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from snakeoil123. Show snakeoil123's posts

    Re: Jeff Green is not good at the 4

    Youre completely right. you know more about Green then any guy that has ever coached him.

     
  7. This post has been removed.

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from tomobo. Show tomobo's posts

    Re: Jeff Green is not good at the 4

    In response to snakeoil123's comment:

    In response to concord27's comment:

     

    In response to tomobo's comment:

     

    In response to snakeoil123's comment:

     

    In response to postal5's comment:

     

    In response to snakeoil123's comment:

     

    In response to Kirk6's comment:

     

    In response to rameakap's comment:

     

    FACTS WE KNEW:

    1. Green gave up more than he was giving when playing at the 4

    2. SF seemed his most natural position

    3. He was still growing as a player and could get better at both positions

    4. He is NOT a SG

     




    Green would be best at the 2.

     

    He could defend the 2 and he would overpower other 2s.

    Do you really think Lee and Terry are better than Green?

     



    Kirk.

     

    Green is 6 foot 9.  He has never played the 2 in his lfe.

    What are you talking about?

     


    Jeff would play 3 on offense while Pierce plays 3.  On D, Jeff covers taller 2's and Paul stays on his usual 3 cover.

     

     



    Why can't Green get minutes at the 3 and the 4 like he always has his entire high school. college and pro career?

     

    He isn't a 2.  

     



    Kirk & Concord should have a beer summit in which each of them spews inanities @ each other until they slowly ease toward drowning themselves in the pitcher placed before them. I'll give them a pass on other topics but jeez...

     

     



    What are you talking about?  Regarding Green I have said only he should start.  As far as other inanities I am probably guilty.  That is what this board is about.  You seem to avoid scrutiny here are you that knowledgeable.  Kirk is repetitive but has point of view.  I don't know where I fall but you just don't seem that consequential yourself.  I cannot put my finger on you having any opinion at all.  

     

     



    He writes about Rondo's cup a lot.

     




    I see that I still loom large in your mental landscape(writer of letters' and such). You'll never be over me. I see that now. HA HA HA

     
  9. This post has been removed.

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from Ortiz123. Show Ortiz123's posts

    Re: Jeff Green is not good at the 4

    In response to Kirk6's comment:

    In response to snakeoil123's comment:

     

    K cool kirk

    Green will be the first 6 9 guard who has never played guard in the history of the NBA.

    We all agree with you.

     



    Thanks for proving my point.

     

    He is bigger and can overpower people at the 2. Doc keeps playing him there for short periods and we do well. Let's do it for a longer time. KG, Bass, Pierce, Green, and Bradley.

     




    Why not Kg at the two...he would over power them too...common Kirk..

    Im not saying he can't do it  it on occasions, but he is not that quick...Koby can, Lebrons on certain occasion too...Green is not that quick...they will get him in foul trouble...Yes, on offense, he can over power them, but at the other end, we will pay for it..PP would be better for that...Lee also..Lee is a very good defender...at the two..he has trouble with the fast points...

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from Ortiz123. Show Ortiz123's posts

    Re: Jeff Green is not good at the 4

    Plus he is to inconsistant with the mid range jumper...not saying he can't improve..Lebrons did..

     
  12. This post has been removed.

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from snakeoil123. Show snakeoil123's posts

    Re: Jeff Green is not good at the 4

    In response to tomobo's comment:

    In response to snakeoil123's comment:

     

    In response to concord27's comment:

     

    In response to tomobo's comment:

     

    In response to snakeoil123's comment:

     

    In response to postal5's comment:

     

    In response to snakeoil123's comment:

     

    In response to Kirk6's comment:

     

    In response to rameakap's comment:

     

    FACTS WE KNEW:

    1. Green gave up more than he was giving when playing at the 4

    2. SF seemed his most natural position

    3. He was still growing as a player and could get better at both positions

    4. He is NOT a SG

     




    Green would be best at the 2.

     

    He could defend the 2 and he would overpower other 2s.

    Do you really think Lee and Terry are better than Green?

     



    Kirk.

     

    Green is 6 foot 9.  He has never played the 2 in his lfe.

    What are you talking about?

     


    Jeff would play 3 on offense while Pierce plays 3.  On D, Jeff covers taller 2's and Paul stays on his usual 3 cover.

     

     



    Why can't Green get minutes at the 3 and the 4 like he always has his entire high school. college and pro career?

     

    He isn't a 2.  

     



    Kirk & Concord should have a beer summit in which each of them spews inanities @ each other until they slowly ease toward drowning themselves in the pitcher placed before them. I'll give them a pass on other topics but jeez...

     

     



    What are you talking about?  Regarding Green I have said only he should start.  As far as other inanities I am probably guilty.  That is what this board is about.  You seem to avoid scrutiny here are you that knowledgeable.  Kirk is repetitive but has point of view.  I don't know where I fall but you just don't seem that consequential yourself.  I cannot put my finger on you having any opinion at all.  

     

     



    He writes about Rondo's cup a lot.

     

     




    I see that I still loom large in your mental landscape(writer of letters' and such). You'll never be over me. I see that now. HA HA HA

     

    I own it. I like making fun of you.

     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from tomobo. Show tomobo's posts

    Re: Jeff Green is not good at the 4

    In response to snakeoil123's comment:

    In response to tomobo's comment:

     

    In response to snakeoil123's comment:

     

    In response to concord27's comment:

     

    In response to tomobo's comment:

     

    In response to snakeoil123's comment:

     

    In response to postal5's comment:

     

    In response to snakeoil123's comment:

     

    In response to Kirk6's comment:

     

    In response to rameakap's comment:

     

    FACTS WE KNEW:

    1. Green gave up more than he was giving when playing at the 4

    2. SF seemed his most natural position

    3. He was still growing as a player and could get better at both positions

    4. He is NOT a SG

     




    Green would be best at the 2.

     

    He could defend the 2 and he would overpower other 2s.

    Do you really think Lee and Terry are better than Green?

     



    Kirk.

     

    Green is 6 foot 9.  He has never played the 2 in his lfe.

    What are you talking about?

     


    Jeff would play 3 on offense while Pierce plays 3.  On D, Jeff covers taller 2's and Paul stays on his usual 3 cover.

     

     



    Why can't Green get minutes at the 3 and the 4 like he always has his entire high school. college and pro career?

     

    He isn't a 2.  

     



    Kirk & Concord should have a beer summit in which each of them spews inanities @ each other until they slowly ease toward drowning themselves in the pitcher placed before them. I'll give them a pass on other topics but jeez...

     

     



    What are you talking about?  Regarding Green I have said only he should start.  As far as other inanities I am probably guilty.  That is what this board is about.  You seem to avoid scrutiny here are you that knowledgeable.  Kirk is repetitive but has point of view.  I don't know where I fall but you just don't seem that consequential yourself.  I cannot put my finger on you having any opinion at all.  

     

     



    He writes about Rondo's cup a lot.

     

     




    I see that I still loom large in your mental landscape(writer of letters' and such). You'll never be over me. I see that now. HA HA HA

     

     

     

    I own it. I like making fun of you.




    Consider yourself owned. Again

     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from snakeoil123. Show snakeoil123's posts

    Re: Jeff Green is not good at the 4

    In response to tomobo's comment:

    In response to snakeoil123's comment:

     

    In response to tomobo's comment:

     

    In response to snakeoil123's comment:

     

    In response to concord27's comment:

     

    In response to tomobo's comment:

     

    In response to snakeoil123's comment:

     

    In response to postal5's comment:

     

    In response to snakeoil123's comment:

     

    In response to Kirk6's comment:

     

    In response to rameakap's comment:

     

    FACTS WE KNEW:

    1. Green gave up more than he was giving when playing at the 4

    2. SF seemed his most natural position

    3. He was still growing as a player and could get better at both positions

    4. He is NOT a SG

     




    Green would be best at the 2.

     

    He could defend the 2 and he would overpower other 2s.

    Do you really think Lee and Terry are better than Green?

     



    Kirk.

     

    Green is 6 foot 9.  He has never played the 2 in his lfe.

    What are you talking about?

     


    Jeff would play 3 on offense while Pierce plays 3.  On D, Jeff covers taller 2's and Paul stays on his usual 3 cover.

     

     



    Why can't Green get minutes at the 3 and the 4 like he always has his entire high school. college and pro career?

     

    He isn't a 2.  

     



    Kirk & Concord should have a beer summit in which each of them spews inanities @ each other until they slowly ease toward drowning themselves in the pitcher placed before them. I'll give them a pass on other topics but jeez...

     

     



    What are you talking about?  Regarding Green I have said only he should start.  As far as other inanities I am probably guilty.  That is what this board is about.  You seem to avoid scrutiny here are you that knowledgeable.  Kirk is repetitive but has point of view.  I don't know where I fall but you just don't seem that consequential yourself.  I cannot put my finger on you having any opinion at all.  

     

     



    He writes about Rondo's cup a lot.

     

     




    I see that I still loom large in your mental landscape(writer of letters' and such). You'll never be over me. I see that now. HA HA HA

     

     

     

    I own it. I like making fun of you.

     




    Consider yourself owned. Again

     



    Yeah. Wow. What a burn. 

    I mock you, then you say "wow I sure am in your head ahahah"

    You're a true internet warrior.

     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from tomobo. Show tomobo's posts

    Re: Jeff Green is not good at the 4

    In response to snakeoil123's comment:

    In response to tomobo's comment:

     

    In response to snakeoil123's comment:

     

    In response to tomobo's comment:

     

    In response to snakeoil123's comment:

     

    In response to concord27's comment:

     

    In response to tomobo's comment:

     

    In response to snakeoil123's comment:

     

    In response to postal5's comment:

     

    In response to snakeoil123's comment:

     

    In response to Kirk6's comment:

     

    In response to rameakap's comment:

     

    FACTS WE KNEW:

    1. Green gave up more than he was giving when playing at the 4

    2. SF seemed his most natural position

    3. He was still growing as a player and could get better at both positions

    4. He is NOT a SG

     




    Green would be best at the 2.

     

    He could defend the 2 and he would overpower other 2s.

    Do you really think Lee and Terry are better than Green?

     



    Kirk.

     

    Green is 6 foot 9.  He has never played the 2 in his lfe.

    What are you talking about?

     


    Jeff would play 3 on offense while Pierce plays 3.  On D, Jeff covers taller 2's and Paul stays on his usual 3 cover.

     

     



    Why can't Green get minutes at the 3 and the 4 like he always has his entire high school. college and pro career?

     

    He isn't a 2.  

     



    Kirk & Concord should have a beer summit in which each of them spews inanities @ each other until they slowly ease toward drowning themselves in the pitcher placed before them. I'll give them a pass on other topics but jeez...

     

     



    What are you talking about?  Regarding Green I have said only he should start.  As far as other inanities I am probably guilty.  That is what this board is about.  You seem to avoid scrutiny here are you that knowledgeable.  Kirk is repetitive but has point of view.  I don't know where I fall but you just don't seem that consequential yourself.  I cannot put my finger on you having any opinion at all.  

     

     



    He writes about Rondo's cup a lot.

     

     




    I see that I still loom large in your mental landscape(writer of letters' and such). You'll never be over me. I see that now. HA HA HA

     

     

     

    I own it. I like making fun of you.

     




    Consider yourself owned. Again

     

     



    Yeah. Wow. What a burn. 

     

    I mock you, then you say "wow I sure am in your head ahahah"

    You're a true internet warrior.



    Look who pops up @ the sound of my bell. Rondo's Dawg. You've picked up the mantle of the cup quite well. Why? Because it hurt you beyond all measure. You're so transparent that you're an honorary white man. Congratulations! You've finally achieved. Now get to writing something of merit(writer of letters' and such)...

     
  17. You have chosen to ignore posts from snakeoil123. Show snakeoil123's posts

    Re: Jeff Green is not good at the 4

    In response to tomobo's comment:

    In response to snakeoil123's comment:

     

    In response to tomobo's comment:

     

    In response to snakeoil123's comment:

     

    In response to tomobo's comment:

     

    In response to snakeoil123's comment:

     

    In response to concord27's comment:

     

    In response to tomobo's comment:

     

    In response to snakeoil123's comment:

     

    In response to postal5's comment:

     

    In response to snakeoil123's comment:

     

    In response to Kirk6's comment:

     

    In response to rameakap's comment:

     

    FACTS WE KNEW:

    1. Green gave up more than he was giving when playing at the 4

    2. SF seemed his most natural position

    3. He was still growing as a player and could get better at both positions

    4. He is NOT a SG

     




    Green would be best at the 2.

     

    He could defend the 2 and he would overpower other 2s.

    Do you really think Lee and Terry are better than Green?

     



    Kirk.

     

    Green is 6 foot 9.  He has never played the 2 in his lfe.

    What are you talking about?

     


    Jeff would play 3 on offense while Pierce plays 3.  On D, Jeff covers taller 2's and Paul stays on his usual 3 cover.

     

     



    Why can't Green get minutes at the 3 and the 4 like he always has his entire high school. college and pro career?

     

    He isn't a 2.  

     



    Kirk & Concord should have a beer summit in which each of them spews inanities @ each other until they slowly ease toward drowning themselves in the pitcher placed before them. I'll give them a pass on other topics but jeez...

     

     



    What are you talking about?  Regarding Green I have said only he should start.  As far as other inanities I am probably guilty.  That is what this board is about.  You seem to avoid scrutiny here are you that knowledgeable.  Kirk is repetitive but has point of view.  I don't know where I fall but you just don't seem that consequential yourself.  I cannot put my finger on you having any opinion at all.  

     

     



    He writes about Rondo's cup a lot.

     

     




    I see that I still loom large in your mental landscape(writer of letters' and such). You'll never be over me. I see that now. HA HA HA

     

     

     

    I own it. I like making fun of you.

     




    Consider yourself owned. Again

     

     



    Yeah. Wow. What a burn. 

     

    I mock you, then you say "wow I sure am in your head ahahah"

    You're a true internet warrior.

     



    Look who pops up @ the sound of my bell. Rondo's Dawg. You've picked up the mantle of the cup quite well. Why? Because it hurt you beyond all measure. You're so transparent that you're an honorary white man. Congratulations! You've finally achieved. Now get to writing something of merit(writer of letters' and such)...

     



    Press a button and watch Tomobo get all worked up.

     

     
  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from tomobo. Show tomobo's posts

    Re: Jeff Green is not good at the 4

    In response to snakeoil123's comment:

    In response to tomobo's comment:

     

    In response to snakeoil123's comment:

     

    In response to tomobo's comment:

     

    In response to snakeoil123's comment:

     

    In response to tomobo's comment:

     

    In response to snakeoil123's comment:

     

    In response to concord27's comment:

     

    In response to tomobo's comment:

     

    In response to snakeoil123's comment:

     

    In response to postal5's comment:

     

    In response to snakeoil123's comment:

     

    In response to Kirk6's comment:

     

    In response to rameakap's comment:

     

    FACTS WE KNEW:

    1. Green gave up more than he was giving when playing at the 4

    2. SF seemed his most natural position

    3. He was still growing as a player and could get better at both positions

    4. He is NOT a SG

     




    Green would be best at the 2.

     

    He could defend the 2 and he would overpower other 2s.

    Do you really think Lee and Terry are better than Green?

     



    Kirk.

     

    Green is 6 foot 9.  He has never played the 2 in his lfe.

    What are you talking about?

     


    Jeff would play 3 on offense while Pierce plays 3.  On D, Jeff covers taller 2's and Paul stays on his usual 3 cover.

     

     



    Why can't Green get minutes at the 3 and the 4 like he always has his entire high school. college and pro career?

     

    He isn't a 2.  

     



    Kirk & Concord should have a beer summit in which each of them spews inanities @ each other until they slowly ease toward drowning themselves in the pitcher placed before them. I'll give them a pass on other topics but jeez...

     

     



    What are you talking about?  Regarding Green I have said only he should start.  As far as other inanities I am probably guilty.  That is what this board is about.  You seem to avoid scrutiny here are you that knowledgeable.  Kirk is repetitive but has point of view.  I don't know where I fall but you just don't seem that consequential yourself.  I cannot put my finger on you having any opinion at all.  

     

     



    He writes about Rondo's cup a lot.

     

     




    I see that I still loom large in your mental landscape(writer of letters' and such). You'll never be over me. I see that now. HA HA HA

     

     

     

    I own it. I like making fun of you.

     




    Consider yourself owned. Again

     

     



    Yeah. Wow. What a burn. 

     

    I mock you, then you say "wow I sure am in your head ahahah"

    You're a true internet warrior.

     



    Look who pops up @ the sound of my bell. Rondo's Dawg. You've picked up the mantle of the cup quite well. Why? Because it hurt you beyond all measure. You're so transparent that you're an honorary white man. Congratulations! You've finally achieved. Now get to writing something of merit(writer of letters' and such)...

     

     



    Press a button and watch Tomobo get all worked up.

     

     



    Ding. See Stalker-in Chief project his feelings so transparently. Watch now. HA HA HA

     
  19. You have chosen to ignore posts from snakeoil123. Show snakeoil123's posts

    Re: Jeff Green is not good at the 4

    So easy.

     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from snakeoil123. Show snakeoil123's posts

    Re: Jeff Green is not good at the 4

    I write one sentence and the dude gets frantic.

     

     

     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share