JO, Bradley, and Dooling for Emeka Okafor

  1. This post has been removed.

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from susan250. Show susan250's posts

    Re: JO, Bradley, and Dooling for Emeka Okafor

    In Response to JO, Bradley, and Dooling for Emeka Okafor:
    DO IT DANNY!
    Posted by Fiercest34


    Would be a good trade but isn't going to happen.  I don't expect many trades will happen for the remainder of the season.  With the shortened season it will be difficult to develop any team chemistry.  The Celtics are already playing with many new players and didn't have a long pre-season.  You may still see players like Howard traded, but I don't believe you will see many mid-season trades. 
     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from vertmont. Show vertmont's posts

    Re: JO, Bradley, and Dooling for Emeka Okafor

    Do it here to. Love to Okafor on the C's.
     
  4. This post has been removed.

     
  5. This post has been removed.

     
  6. This post has been removed.

     
  7. This post has been removed.

     
  8. This post has been removed.

     
  9. This post has been removed.

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from bostonsucks69. Show bostonsucks69's posts

    Re: JO, Bradley, and Dooling for Emeka Okafor

    Good luck trying to make a trade with David Stern. lol
     
  11. This post has been removed.

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from PHX85014. Show PHX85014's posts

    Re: JO, Bradley, and Dooling for Emeka Okafor

    WHO IS THIS INSANE PERSON WHO WANTS TO GIVE UP THE HOUSE FOR ROBIN LOPEZ ?????????? , AVERY BRADLEY, JUJUAN JOHNSON AND A #1 PICK FOR LOPEZ ? YOU ARE NUTS PAL !

    MUST BE A FANTASY GEEK

    ROBIN LOPEZ IS A FLOP , WE'VE ALREADY SEEN PATRICK O'BRYANT AND SHELDEN WILLIAMS, LOPEZ IS NO BETTER THAN THOSE GUYS...

    J'ON IS FAR SUPERIOR AND FINALLY HEALTHY , JUJUAN JOHNSON IS BETTER STRAIGHT UP THAN LOPEZ, WAY TOO EARLY TO BE THROWING AVERY UNDER THE BUS.....GIVE THE GUY A CHANCE !


     
  13. This post has been removed.

     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from TheNewGKDynasty. Show TheNewGKDynasty's posts

    Re: JO, Bradley, and Dooling for Emeka Okafor

    And for drafting Bradley we can say thaaaaaaaaaank yoooooooooooouuuuuuuuu Daaaaaaaaaannyyyyyyyyyyyyyy...
     
  15. This post has been removed.

     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from Red-16Russ-11. Show Red-16Russ-11's posts

    Re: JO, Bradley, and Dooling for Emeka Okafor

    In Response to Re: JO, Bradley, and Dooling for Emeka Okafor:
    And for drafting Bradley we can say thaaaaaaaaaank yoooooooooooouuuuuuuuu Daaaaaaaaaannyyyyyyyyyyyyyy...
    Posted by TheNewGKDynasty


    And your analysis of your team, my friend?

    Let me guess, it's only ONE game, right?
     
  17. This post has been removed.

     
  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from Red-16Russ-11. Show Red-16Russ-11's posts

    Re: JO, Bradley, and Dooling for Emeka Okafor

    In Response to Re: JO, Bradley, and Dooling for Emeka Okafor:
    In Response to Re: JO, Bradley, and Dooling for Emeka Okafor : What is there to analyze? Without Phil Jackson it's Kobe, Kobe, and Kobe without a pre-nup! Ugh!
    Posted by Fiercest34


    Still want to trade Rondo for Gasol????......:)
     
  19. You have chosen to ignore posts from TheNewGKDynasty. Show TheNewGKDynasty's posts

    Re: JO, Bradley, and Dooling for Emeka Okafor

    By the way that Lakers defense is already clicking. I though you said we couldn't get better without practice. Bulls were one of the best offensive team in the league last season. You really played organized basketball????
    Celtics 65 pts in a half and 106 the entire game. Like null says ugh!
    When Bynum gets back defense will be much better.
     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from Red-16Russ-11. Show Red-16Russ-11's posts

    Re: JO, Bradley, and Dooling for Emeka Okafor

    In Response to Re: JO, Bradley, and Dooling for Emeka Okafor:
    By the way that Lakers defense is already clicking. I though you said we couldn't get better without practice. Bulls were one of the best offensive team in the league last season. You really played organized basketball???? Celtics 65 pts in a half and 106 the entire game. Like null says ugh! When Bynum gets back defense will be much better.
    Posted by TheNewGKDynasty


    Actually not true, the Bulls were the #1 DEfensive team in the league last year.  I seem to recall them complaining all year that Rose was doing too much!!  Boozer not doing enough?  Any of this ring a bell?  Holding them under 100 is not  a big deal at all!!
     
  21. This post has been removed.

     
  22. You have chosen to ignore posts from Red-16Russ-11. Show Red-16Russ-11's posts

    Re: JO, Bradley, and Dooling for Emeka Okafor

    In Response to Re: JO, Bradley, and Dooling for Emeka Okafor:
    In Response to Re: JO, Bradley, and Dooling for Emeka Okafor : Get your facts right, Rico! The Bulls were 20th in offense last season. Bulls not even in the top 10! Trying to pull a fast one? PTS/G:  98.6 (20th of 30) ▪  Opp PTS/G:  91.3 (2nd of 30) http://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/CHI/2011.html So much for organized basketball. Ugh!
    Posted by Fiercest34


    Good show, I said #1 on D - of course, mine was off the top of my head....:)
     
  23. This post has been removed.

     
  24. This post has been removed.

     
  25. You have chosen to ignore posts from TheNewGKDynasty. Show TheNewGKDynasty's posts

    Re: JO, Bradley, and Dooling for Emeka Okafor

    97.5 a game last season. 10 pts. under their avg is a lot. The best defensive team last year (Bobcats) aloud 93.8 so 87 is good enough and without Bynum. We lost because the Bulls are better. No refs and it was 5 vs 5 will never get a corny excuse about refs and home teams getting calls. Never.
     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share