KG To Return With Or Without Pierce

  1. This post has been removed.

     
  2. This post has been removed.

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from Russell1. Show Russell1's posts

    Re: KG To Return With Or Without Pierce

    In response to Fierce34's comment:

    If this is true then KG lied when he said he won't play without Pierce.



    I thought he said he would like Paul back? 

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from 37stories. Show 37stories's posts

    Re: KG To Return With Or Without Pierce

    I like Pierce but eh and Green play the same position.  Green, Milsap, Garnett>Pierce, Green, Garnett simply because you have two guys that both are best at the 3.

    A rotation of Garnett, Sully, and Milsap as bigs is not bad at all.

     
  5. This post has been removed.

     
  6. This post has been removed.

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from 37stories. Show 37stories's posts

    Re: KG To Return With Or Without Pierce

    I may have misread that but I thought it said that if they dumped Pierce they could pay Milsap.

    Which as I was saying as much as I like Pierce Green is already contract and paying 2 SF's well upwwards of 20 million would be insane.

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from BCSP. Show BCSP's posts

    Re: KG To Return With Or Without Pierce

    Thanks for the post Fierce! It will be interesting to see how the Cs swing PM's contract (if they get him), without going over the salary cap!

    This must mean PP is gone!

     

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from BCSP. Show BCSP's posts

    Re: KG To Return With Or Without Pierce

    In response to Fierce34's comment:

     

    In response to 37stories' comment:

     

    I like Pierce but eh and Green play the same position.  Green, Milsap, Garnett>Pierce, Green, Garnett simply because you have two guys that both are best at the 3.

    A rotation of Garnett, Sully, and Milsap as bigs is not bad at all.

     



    True, that's not bad at all!

     

    The problem is if KG returns, we can't afford Millsap.

    Millsap will be looking to get paid 7-8m per year. Celts don't have the cap space for that.

     



    What if the Cs amnesty PP?

     

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from Russell1. Show Russell1's posts

    Re: KG To Return With Or Without Pierce

    In response to BCSP's comment:

    In response to Fierce34's comment:

     

    In response to 37stories' comment:

     

    I like Pierce but eh and Green play the same position.  Green, Milsap, Garnett>Pierce, Green, Garnett simply because you have two guys that both are best at the 3.

    A rotation of Garnett, Sully, and Milsap as bigs is not bad at all.

     



    True, that's not bad at all!

     

    The problem is if KG returns, we can't afford Millsap.

    Millsap will be looking to get paid 7-8m per year. Celts don't have the cap space for that.

     



    What if the Cs amnesty PP?

     



    Ainge may do something like he did to get Lee, we will see.

     
  11. This post has been removed.

     
  12. This post has been removed.

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from Red-16Russ-11. Show Red-16Russ-11's posts

    Re: KG To Return With Or Without Pierce

    Rondo sign and trade to Utah for Millsap and #14 - c'mon guys, I was on this a week ago....lol

     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from prakash. Show prakash's posts

    Re: KG To Return With Or Without Pierce

    First off all this does not suggest that Paul is not coming back.  Utah is way under the cap.  They can sign Millsap if they want to.  If not, they can do a sign and trade.  They need multiple players.  And Utah is not a prime free agent destination.

    If the Celts bring in Millsap then Millsap, Bass and Sullinger are one too many.  If Millsap wants to play in Boston then this deal could be swung for Lee and salary cap fodder (Shav, TWill, DJ White).  Utah will need a Lee level backup 2 and will need to pay him Lee kind of money.  It will require that Millsap wants to play in Boston.

    Also, if this happens then this will not be the only move.  I think that Bass will be gone.  Where?  How?

     
  15. This post has been removed.

     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from prakash. Show prakash's posts

    Re: KG To Return With Or Without Pierce

    I am now wondering if Montae Ellis is plan B if the Millsap plan works.  It will mean shipping AB and Bass.  But the Celts will get some nice salary cap room.

     
  17. You have chosen to ignore posts from gman101019. Show gman101019's posts

    Re: KG To Return With Or Without Pierce

    Another undersized 4? Really? We already have 2. Unless we can trade bbass too, I see no point in obtaining millsap. Plus, Id like to see sully in the starting lineup avg 29-33 mpg. 

     
  18. This post has been removed.

     
  19. You have chosen to ignore posts from Red-16Russ-11. Show Red-16Russ-11's posts

    Re: KG To Return With Or Without Pierce

    Rondo for Millsap and #14

    Bass and Lee for Bargnani

     

    Olynk and Schroeder..........

     
  20. This post has been removed.

     
  21. This post has been removed.

     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share