Kings at Celtics

  1. This post has been removed.

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from 37stories. Show 37stories's posts

    Re: Kings at Celtics

    In response to mossad-did-911's comment:
    [QUOTE]

                            Spread                 Total

    Kings                -1                         201

    Celtics              +1     

     

    Both teams have been playing well recently, but as a home dog I've got to go with Boston. 90% of public bets are on the Kings and 90% of public bets are on the over 201.

    I'm going to play it safe and go against the public and take Boston +1, but i'm also going to gamble and side with the public on the over 201. I'm expecting a high scoring, fast paced game, and a Celtics victory.

    Boston +1 Over 201

     

    [/QUOTE]

    you have to take the over. I take the Celtics and the over as well.

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from BCSP. Show BCSP's posts

    Re: Kings at Celtics

    Kings strengths are Cs weakneeses - Dominant big man and scoring PG!

    Prediction: Kings win by 4-pts. 

    Yes - I have been wrong before LOL! 

     
  4. This post has been removed.

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from 37stories. Show 37stories's posts

    Re: Kings at Celtics

    In response to Mployee8's comment:

    Rondo not playing and Bradley questionable ... Danny is tanking tonight!



    Ha.

    Yep.

    Sacramento all the way.

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from ANONMD08. Show ANONMD08's posts

    Re: Kings at Celtics

    I guess a 2 game win streak is good enough.

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from kyceltic. Show kyceltic's posts

    Re: Kings at Celtics

    In response to Mployee8's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Rondo not playing and Bradley questionable ... Danny is tanking tonight!

    [/QUOTE]  OMG, they're about to be traded!


     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from BCSP. Show BCSP's posts

    Re: Kings at Celtics

    In response to kyceltic's comment:

    In response to Mployee8's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Rondo not playing and Bradley questionable ... Danny is tanking tonight!

      OMG, they're about to be traded!


    [/QUOTE]

    HaHaHa!! - and a new thread is born!! 

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from CeltsFanInNH. Show CeltsFanInNH's posts

    Re: Kings at Celtics

    With Rondo and AB out we really need Jeff Green to step to the plate and be his normal self. 3-12 , 0-4, 5r and 3a. 

     
  10. This post has been removed.

     
  11. This post has been removed.

     
  12. This post has been removed.

     
  13. This post has been removed.

     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from Petey62. Show Petey62's posts

    Re: Kings at Celtics

    Can someone tell me the difference between being a genuinely bad team versus "tanking"?

    Why do so many posters say we're tanking?  Why would we resort to such nonsense?  We're bad enough to finish deep in the lottery without gimmicks designed to improve our chances of losing games.

    I know AB reinjured his right ankle against Philly but why is Rondo out tonight?

    Man, there was once a time when it was an automatic "W" when Sacramento came to town.  Those were the days.

    I dread Pressey starting tonight.  We're doomed.

     
  15. This post has been removed.

     
  16. This post has been removed.

     
  17. You have chosen to ignore posts from Petey62. Show Petey62's posts

    Re: Kings at Celtics

    Did you say "sore"?

    Oh, okay.  Thanks.

    Is Sully playing?  I guess his finger isn't "sore" anymore.

    "Sore"......... not playing due to "soreness".

    Wow, that's a new one.

     
  18. This post has been removed.

     
  19. This post has been removed.

     
  20. This post has been removed.

     
  21. You have chosen to ignore posts from Petey62. Show Petey62's posts

    Re: Kings at Celtics

    In response to Fiercy's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Pete

    Celts were a bad team to start the season.

    But they were not bad enough to end up with a top 5 pick.

    So Ainge downgraded by trading Lee and Craw.

     

    Just like I said last October, Ainge will do the tanking.

    [/QUOTE]

    Oh, like "you" said last October?  Fierce, you couldn't be more wrong.  Our roster today is better than it was before our trades.

    The Celtics WERE bad enough to end up with a top 5 pick with the roster we started the season with had they stayed together.  You really believe Crawford and Lee were going to make us a middle of the pack team?  That's funny!

    We APPEARED better because we played in a horrible conference and the other teams in our division "sucked".  It's an 82 game season and, believe me, we were not going to be any better with Marshon Brooks, Jordan Crawford and Courtney Lee than we will be with our current roster.

    It only seemed that we might end up better because everybody else was horrible.  Crawford's minutes were going to be reduced significantly anyway as were Lee's once Rondo returned.  And Brooks wasn't playing anyway so I don't see how we downgraded so much.  In essence, we lost Brooks, Crawford and Lee and now have Chris Johnson, Bayless and Rondo back.

    That is no downgrade.

     
  22. This post has been removed.

     
  23. This post has been removed.

     
  24. This post has been removed.

     
  25. This post has been removed.

     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share