Lakers beat the Spurs at AT & T - without #24!

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from Elven 32. Show Elven 32's posts

    Re: Lakers beat the Spurs at AT & T - without #24!

    Sadly, Boston had a great record in the bush league days of no 3pt shots, an 8 team league (lmao), winning your conference(lol) meant you went through to the conference finals(lol) and many other characterizations which made the NBA back then a bush league.

    Roll forward to the NBA/ABA merge and in particular the Magic/Bird years and the NBA as we know it kicked off hugely. In that time, the real franchises have stood up and made their mark in a league now studded with the best players from around the globe, unlike the bush league days.
     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from Red-16Russ-11. Show Red-16Russ-11's posts

    Re: Lakers beat the Spurs at AT & T - without #24!

    In Response to Re: Lakers beat the Spurs at AT & T - without #24!:
    [QUOTE]Sadly, Boston had a great record in the bush league days of no 3pt shots, an 8 team league (lmao), winning your conference(lol) meant you went through to the conference finals(lol) and many other characterizations which made the NBA back then a bush league. Roll forward to the NBA/ABA merge and in particular the Magic/Bird years and the NBA as we know it kicked off hugely. In that time, the real franchises have stood up and made their mark in a league now studded with the best players from around the globe, unlike the bush league days.
    Posted by Elven 32[/QUOTE]


    Which, according to your logic, makes about 20 of the Yankees WS pennants worthless, right?
     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from RicoLakerfan. Show RicoLakerfan's posts

    Re: Lakers beat the Spurs at AT & T - without #24!

    In Response to Re: Lakers beat the Spurs at AT & T - without #24!:
    [QUOTE]Sadly, Boston had a great record in the bush league days of no 3pt shots, an 8 team league (lmao), winning your conference(lol) meant you went through to the conference finals(lol) and many other characterizations which made the NBA back then a bush league. Roll forward to the NBA/ABA merge and in particular the Magic/Bird years and the NBA as we know it kicked off hugely. In that time, the real franchises have stood up and made their mark in a league now studded with the best players from around the globe, unlike the bush league days.
    Posted by Elven 32[/QUOTE]


    Oh Elfie What is sad is in those Bush league days they beat and humiliated and destroyed us. We will never catch the great Celtics. We have never beat a fully healthy Celtics team in the finals we are lucky they are not 12-0 against us. 

    We Laker fans have much to be grateful for.

    We're number two!!!
     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from rameakap. Show rameakap's posts

    Re: Lakers beat the Spurs at AT & T - without #24!

    In Response to Re: Lakers beat the Spurs at AT & T - without #24!:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Lakers beat the Spurs at AT & T - without #24! : Which, according to your logic, makes about 20 of the Yankees WS pennants worthless, right?
    Posted by Red-16Russ-11[/QUOTE]

    hahahaha

    Elven is getting hammered with his idiocy today

    the #'s that matter are:

    17 vs. 16

    9 vs. 3

    131-92

    6-24 MVP gifted by refs

    Celtics greatest franchise ever

    2012 Celtics will go father in the playoffs than LA
     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from Elven 32. Show Elven 32's posts

    Re: Lakers beat the Spurs at AT & T - without #24!

    For those who missed the column by Hollinger (he who Boston fans are currently quoting on his all defensive team) I post for your pleasure:

    http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/playoffs/2010/columns/story?columnist=hollinger_john&page=FranchiseRankings2010-Intro

    http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/playoffs/2009/columns/story?columnist=hollinger_john&page=FranchiseRankings2010-Lakers

    http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/playoffs/2010/columns/story?columnist=hollinger_john&page=FranchiseRankings2010-Celtics

    Enjoy!
     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from OC-CeltsFan. Show OC-CeltsFan's posts

    Re: Lakers beat the Spurs at AT & T - without #24!

    In response to "Re: Lakers beat the Spurs at AT & T - without #24!": [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Lakers beat the Spurs at AT & T - without #24! : Oh if only that were true. The Celtics have more titles. More Hall of Famers, Have beat us more head to head, have beat us 9-3 in title games. We just aren't as good. It's time for us laker fans to be real. Even with all of our recent success we still can't catch the most dominat franchise inthe history of Basketball.  Posted by RicoLakerfan[/QUOTE] Glad to see that there's one objective laker fan on this board. LA is so obsessed with catching the celtics that they even enlisted another franchise, in hopes of someday saying that they also had 17 NBA championship parades. Even being outnumbered 2 to 1, Boston still has way more titles: 17 - 11. Sorry Rico, between the lakers and clips, maybe LA will catch us sometime in your lifetime. Just don't hold your breath.
     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from rameakap. Show rameakap's posts

    Re: Lakers beat the Spurs at AT & T - without #24!

    In Response to Re: Lakers beat the Spurs at AT & T - without #24!:
    [QUOTE]For those who missed the column by Hollinger (he who Boston fans are currently quoting on his all defensive team) I post for your pleasure: http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/playoffs/2010/columns/story?columnist=hollinger_john&page=FranchiseRankings2010-Intro http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/playoffs/2009/columns/story?columnist=hollinger_john&page=FranchiseRankings2010-Lakers http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/playoffs/2010/columns/story?columnist=hollinger_john&page=FranchiseRankings2010-Celtics Enjoy!
    Posted by Elven 32[/QUOTE]

    The Lakers are the best team in the second half of NBA history

    The Celtics are the best team in the first half

    17-16

    9-3

    131-92 (hahaha)

    The Celtics are the best team IN THE ENTIRE NBA HISTORY

    If Elven and the misguided and wrong John Hollinger want to pretend the NBA started in 1976 then they can make-up what they want in their own minds. I guess I'll pretend the Babe Ruth Yankees don't count then (hahaha)

    The FACT remains

    Boston is the greatest franchise in the history of the NBA... when you pass us in titles then you can stake the claim... duh
     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from RicoLakerfan. Show RicoLakerfan's posts

    Re: Lakers beat the Spurs at AT & T - without #24!

    In Response to Re: Lakers beat the Spurs at AT & T - without #24!:
    [QUOTE]For those who missed the column by Hollinger (he who Boston fans are currently quoting on his all defensive team) I post for your pleasure: http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/playoffs/2010/columns/story?columnist=hollinger_john&page=FranchiseRankings2010-Intro http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/playoffs/2009/columns/story?columnist=hollinger_john&page=FranchiseRankings2010-Lakers http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/playoffs/2010/columns/story?columnist=hollinger_john&page=FranchiseRankings2010-Celtics Enjoy!
    Posted by Elven 32[/QUOTE]


    I feel your pain Elfie. I too have read hollinger hoping to feel better about the fact that Boston has 6 more banners the L.A. and have dominated us through and through. 

    Go Lakers! WE'RE NUMBER TWO!!!
     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from rameakap. Show rameakap's posts

    Re: Lakers beat the Spurs at AT & T - without #24!

    Since you LOVE Hollinger so much... here is his latest list of title contenders:

    http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/story/_/page/PERDiem-120412/nba-title-contenders-state-union

    Boston is 5

    LA, sadly, is 6th

    hahaha

    I don't think either has a chance... but the Celts are playing great team ball, LA selfish thug ball, and I'm 99% sure the Celtics (barring injury) will be playing later than the Fakers this year

    and 17-16 don't lie, greatest franchise in NBA history

    regardsLaughing
     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from RicoLakerfan. Show RicoLakerfan's posts

    Re: Lakers beat the Spurs at AT & T - without #24!

    In Response to Re: Lakers beat the Spurs at AT & T - without #24!:
    [QUOTE]Since you LOVE Hollinger so much... here is his latest list of title contenders: http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/story/_/page/PERDiem-120412/nba-title-contenders-state-union Boston is 5 LA, sadly, is 6th hahaha I don't think either has a chance... but the Celts are playing great team ball, LA selfish thug ball, and I'm 99% sure the Celtics (barring injury) will be playing later than the Fakers this year and 17-16 don't lie, greatest franchise in NBA history regards
    Posted by rameakap[/QUOTE]


    And the Celtics have Cap space and multiple number one picks next year and KG wanting to come back cheap. My Lakers will never catch you guys. 
     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from rameakap. Show rameakap's posts

    Re: Lakers beat the Spurs at AT & T - without #24!

    Rico,

    if you trade Gasol for two solid younger starters, get a mature/healthy bynum, get a new coach and keep sending Kobe on his mysterious Germany trips... then you could leapfrog SA/Memphis and lose to OKC in a few West finals before Kobe finally retires

    Thats a lot of if's tho

    The Celtics are in the same boat with Chi/Mia despite being a better team now than LA and having tons of cap space and draft picks...
     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share