LAKERS WIN LAKERS WIN!!

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from hedleylamarr. Show hedleylamarr's posts

    Re: LAKERS WIN LAKERS WIN!!

    I have to give dirty credit as being the only lakers fan with any sac................he will, however, disagree with anything said about the lakers this year.

     

    I said 2 years ago they should make kobe the PG and go after a SG, since in the Fisher era, kobe handled the ball more anyway.

    Acquiring Steve Nash was a big mistake, and Kupchak doesn't usually make them.

    Trading for Eric Gordon...getting Jason Terry, or Radja Bell, or Rip Hamilton, or Kirk Hinrich  MAY have given them a better team.  If they traded Gasol, they could have Kenyon Martin to go along with Earl Clark and the soon-to-be-returning Jordan Hill.

    Face it, the downward spiral started with the justifiable veto of the Chris Paul trade, and the subsequent hissy fit from Lamar.

    If Howard walks ( and I doubt he will), they will be FORCED to trade Gasol for pennies on the dollar............it will be tough to watch for a while.

    The only real solution is to trade Gasol and amnesty kobe............but they won't do that.

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from SFBostonFan. Show SFBostonFan's posts

    Re: LAKERS WIN LAKERS WIN!!

    In response to hedleylamarr's comment:

    I have to give dirty credit as being the only lakers fan with any sac................he will, however, disagree with anything said about the lakers this year.

     

    I said 2 years ago they should make kobe the PG and go after a SG, since in the Fisher era, kobe handled the ball more anyway.

    Acquiring Steve Nash was a big mistake, and Kupchak doesn't usually make them.

    Trading for Eric Gordon...getting Jason Terry, or Radja Bell, or Rip Hamilton, or Kirk Hinrich  MAY have given them a better team.  If they traded Gasol, they could have Kenyon Martin to go along with Earl Clark and the soon-to-be-returning Jordan Hill.

    Face it, the downward spiral started with the justifiable veto of the Chris Paul trade, and the subsequent hissy fit from Lamar.

    If Howard walks ( and I doubt he will), they will be FORCED to trade Gasol for pennies on the dollar............it will be tough to watch for a while.

    The only real solution is to trade Gasol and amnesty kobe............but they won't do that.




    ======================

     

    Very good analysis----glad you are not Kupchak because I think this formula would have made them very competitve. And especially so if we stupidly traded Rondo for Gasol !!!

     
  3. This post has been removed.

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from BCSP. Show BCSP's posts

    Re: LAKERS WIN LAKERS WIN!!

    In response to TheNewGKDynasty's comment:

    Celtics 40 - 39. If we are a crappy team. What are the Celtics?????



    A team with an emerging young star (JG) and a 1st round draft pick! Next question GK! 

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from dirty52. Show dirty52's posts

    Re: LAKERS WIN LAKERS WIN!!

    In response to Fierce34's comment:

    In response to dirty52's comment:

     

    the celtics 7th seed....more injured than la..

     

    lakers had there team longer and are 8th....

     

    LAKERS 8th

    celtics 7th

     

    BOSTON PLUS 1

     




    Not quite true

     

     

     

    Steve Nash   50 games played

    Steve Blake 47 games

    Jordan Hill 29 games  and still out

    Pau Gasol  47 games

     

    Nash and Blake were out at the same time

     

     

     



    What?

     

    Nash and Blake were out at the same time?

    Excuses?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DtGBIOEf7ro

     

    Excuses, excuses, you'll hear them everyday...

     photo wwwMessenToolscom-Humor-risa-perro.gif




    Fierce

     

    Maybe you should take up reading comprehension.

     

    No where in that post did i make a excuse.

     

    The Dr. said this

    the celtics 7th seed....more injured than la..

     

    lakers had there team longer and are 8th

     

    I said that was not quite  true.

    Its not a excuse . Its the truth

     
  6. This post has been removed.

     
  7. This post has been removed.

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from Ortiz123. Show Ortiz123's posts

    Re: LAKERS WIN LAKERS WIN!!

    and then hire another idiot coach that lets their superstar play 40+ minutes....

    "Bryant has taken control over when he will play. Often this season, he has hijacked the offense and refused to play defense, too. Sometimes it has worked, but the Lakers’ strategy of allowing Bryant off a leash currently has them struggling for the eighth and final playoff spot—hardly impressive by anyone’s standards.

    From day one on the job, D’Antoni molded an environment where Bryant maintained complete control over his own play."

    http://www.nbclosangeles.com/blogs/triple-threat/Lakers-Kobe-Bryant-minutes-causing-coach-concern-202064961.html 

    Thanks D"Antoni!!

     
  9. This post has been removed.

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from dirty52. Show dirty52's posts

    Re: LAKERS WIN LAKERS WIN!!

    In response to Fierce34's comment:

     

    In response to dirty52's comment:

     

     

    Fierce

     

     

    Maybe you should take up reading comprehension.

     

    No where in that post did i make a excuse.

     

    The Dr. said this

    the celtics 7th seed....more injured than la..

     

    lakers had there team longer and are 8th

     

    I said that was not quite  true.

    Its not a excuse . Its the truth

     



    Reading comprehension?

     

    Have you lost touch with reality?

    Back in October I already branded the Lakers a crappy team because they were signing old players like Nash and Jamison. 

    Are you surprised that old players easily get injured?

    The Lakers are expected to suffer a lot of injuries because they're old and they have a weak bench that will force the coach to play Kobe a lot, and I mean a lot, of minutes.

    Get it?

     

    Again, you're just making excuses. 

    As early as March, the Celts were already resting Pierce and KG. The Celts would have won more games if KG and Pierce didn't rest. Get it?

     




    I guess you still can't comprehend. I am not making any excuses.

     

    Maybe Hedley  can teach you how to read and comprehend

     

     

     

     
  11. This post has been removed.

     
  12. This post has been removed.

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from susan250. Show susan250's posts

    Re: LAKERS WIN LAKERS WIN!!

    In response to LloydDobler's comment:

    No doubt a heck of a win for the Lakers, especially without Kobe. But they're clearly in  a lot of trouble with his injury and the fact  that they cannot guard anyone.

     


    Definitely agree.  It was an impressive win by the Lakers but I am not sure they can maintain this level of play once the playoffs start.  It won't be easy for them to win many games without Kobe. 

     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from KingShaq. Show KingShaq's posts

    Re: LAKERS WIN LAKERS WIN!!

    In response to Fierce34's comment:

    Seriously, the Lakers will have to wait until the last game of the season is over before they will know for sure they will make it to the playoffs. The Celts already clinched a playoff spot last week. See the difference?

    It's not that difficult to understand, the Lakers are simply a CRAPPY TEAM!




    A crappy team at 45-37? compared to a more crappy team at 41-39?

    "The Celts already clinched a playoff spot last week", you say?

    That's no excuse of losing. There is no rule saying team must lose games by resting players after clinching playoff spots.


    Now who should stop making excuses?

     

     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from hedleylamarr. Show hedleylamarr's posts

    Re: LAKERS WIN LAKERS WIN!!

    According to the latest NBA standings, the lakers are 44-37.

     

    Counting seems to be a problem for some!!

     

    Anyone here...ANYONE...say the Celtics are anything more than mediocre since Rondo went down??????

    ANYONE?????????????????????????????????????

    Crappy is crappy, there are no degrees of crappy..........that's creepy!!

     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from LloydDobler. Show LloydDobler's posts

    Re: LAKERS WIN LAKERS WIN!!

    In response to Fierce34's comment:

    The Celtics offered Rondo for Gasol last season. But the Lakers said no.



    Uh ... link?

     

     
  17. You have chosen to ignore posts from hedleylamarr. Show hedleylamarr's posts

    Re: LAKERS WIN LAKERS WIN!!

    In response to LloydDobler's comment:

    In response to Fierce34's comment:

     

    The Celtics offered Rondo for Gasol last season. But the Lakers said no.

     



    Uh ... link?

     

     




    Well, I read it, too........but I couldn't tell give you a link........I could give you another schnitzingruben, unless 15 is your limit!!

     
  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from KingShaq. Show KingShaq's posts

    Re: LAKERS WIN LAKERS WIN!!

    In response to hedleylamarr's comment:

    Crappy is crappy, there are no degrees of crappy




    Says who? If that's you, I don't worry about it...

    Crappy is an adjective, true or false?

    http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/crappy?s=t

    crappy

    adjective, crap·pi·er, crap·pi·est.

     

     
  19. You have chosen to ignore posts from hedleylamarr. Show hedleylamarr's posts

    Re: LAKERS WIN LAKERS WIN!!

    In response to KingShaq's comment:

    In response to hedleylamarr's comment:

     

    Crappy is crappy, there are no degrees of crappy

     




     

    Says who? If that's you, I don't worry about it...

    Crappy is an adjective, true or false?

    http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/crappy?s=t

    crappy

    adjective, crap·pi·er, crap·pi·est.

     




    Since when is 45 wins the same as 44?

    Go ahead and explain that one  - I'll wait.

    And you said "crappy" not crappier.....................nice try - I'll wait for that one, too.

    By the way, 4 years from now I STILL won't let you off the hook for not being able to distinguish 45 from 44, or crappy from crappier!!

     
  20. This post has been removed.

     
  21. You have chosen to ignore posts from hedleylamarr. Show hedleylamarr's posts

    Re: LAKERS WIN LAKERS WIN!!

    Since when is 45 wins the same as 44?  I await your answer.

    Crappy is crappy...................Crappier was never said!!!

     

    Both teams are crappy, but the Celtics have a better chance against the Knicks than the lakers do against the Thunder.........................

     
  22. You have chosen to ignore posts from KingShaq. Show KingShaq's posts

    Re: LAKERS WIN LAKERS WIN!!

    In response to hedleylamarr's comment:

     

    Since when is 45 wins the same as 44?  I await your answer.[/QUOTE]

    Not before you substantiate the "fact" that "had Bynum not injured". I'll wait for your answer. So far there hasn't been one for 4 years...

     

     

     

     

     

    Crappy is crappy...................Crappier was never said!!!

     

    Says who? It's in the dictionary.

     

     

     
  23. You have chosen to ignore posts from hedleylamarr. Show hedleylamarr's posts

    Re: LAKERS WIN LAKERS WIN!!

    Who cares about the dictionary?  It was never said in this context, on this thread.....the WORD crappier was not used by anyone.................meanwhile, back to the point at hand:

    IN WHAT UNIVERSE IS 45 WINS THE SAME AS 44???

    I WILL NEVER LET YOU OFF THE HOOK, MIGHT AS WELL GIVE UP!!!

     

    Obnoxious, isn't it???????

     
  24. You have chosen to ignore posts from hedleylamarr. Show hedleylamarr's posts

    Re: LAKERS WIN LAKERS WIN!!

    Here is the Game 6 box score from 2008 - it lists Pau Gasol as the starting CENTER on the lakers.....................just like I said:

     

    http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/boxscore?gid=2008061702

     

     
  25. This post has been removed.

     

Share