Re: Lets help the Bulls help the Celtics
posted at 11/26/2013 11:19 PM EST
In response to Fierce34's comment:
In response to R9R's comment:
Common dude you contradict yourself. You just said to tank would be to trade Bass & Humphries.
Crawfords the bad player who can do well on a bad team. Just like a Nate Robinson. Not going to win us anything.
Snell was the 20th pick in this last draft. He came from a similar situation as Leonard and has been compared to him.
I'm just saying, nobody in the NBA wanted Crawford a month ago including the Celtics. Why not sell high, get worse in the short term, and get another guy on a rookie deal with potential? This way we can pay Avery who is a superior player to Crawford.
Listen, I like what Crawfords been doing, but its all about selling high and taking advantage of situations. Bulls could use him and we could use young talent.
It's not contradicting my self.
Trading Bass and Humpy is the right thing to do because they are not part of the future plans.
Both Bass and Humpy and are 28 years old.
Crawford is just 25 years old.
There's a big difference.
Right now Crawford has proven he can play PG.
He's our best shooter right now.
And he will not demand a huge contract.
So he's a keeper for a lot of reasons.
Every year there are guys, that come out of the draft, like Snell.
Trading Humphries is a bad idea unless he can be packaged with one of our young bigs and draft picks for an allstar type player.
We need the salary to expire. Danny is not going to trade him just to get another couple of mid tier role players.
Crawford may be legit.
Why not trade Brooks for Snell & Teague?
Oh yeah, because Brooks has no value, just like Crawford 1 month ago.