Re: Love outrebounds Davis 24 to 1.
posted at 1/4/2011 6:17 PM EST
- P34
- Posts: 3719
- First: 8/22/2010
- Last: 3/22/2011
In Response to
Re: Love outrebounds Davis 24 to 1.:
Um, do you realize that game came down to one possession?? Did you see the traveling call on a free layup and block by RA? Did you watch the same game?
Posted by BiasLewis
So the Celtics didn't play good defense because it came down to one possession, is that what you're saying?
Re: Love outrebounds Davis 24 to 1.
posted at 1/4/2011 6:27 PM EST
- aciemvp
- Posts: 3033
- First: 3/7/2008
- Last: 5/19/2013
In Response to
Re: Love outrebounds Davis 24 to 1.:
In Response to Re: Love outrebounds Davis 24 to 1. : I understand you want to put blame on everyone thats not carrying their load, not just BBD... but the point is for this game vs the TWolves.. nobody got waxxed like Big Baby did.
Posted by Karllost
that's great. so it's true. and arguably it's all symantics. you know, if i got too much coffee in me after a celts win and came on here pointed out how rondo and biedrins are fighting it out for the basement FT% in the league, following a lousy FT shooting game like rondo, i'd be assailed.
a win is a win. davis got outrebounded by 23. i think that is horrible. i know he can do better and can't understand why for a guy who shows so much mobility doing other things on the floor, why can't he move his butt around better boxing people out? i dunno.
but i chose to look at the whole team and the malaise that has enveloped others more so than it has davis the last few games that have been close squeakers. i thought it was more meaningful to point out the fact that 2/3 of the personnel on the team leave something to be desired of in their recent performance.
and i'll tell you this, if we don't get something out of nate, marcheese and shak tonight, we are dead meat. davis has historically done well against duncan and we'll see how he does against blair. but i assert that our success in this game depends on rondo scoring some points, marcheese doing something, nate doing something other than a goose egg and shak being active on the glass, IN ADDITION to just davis being a sound rebounder. right?!
Re: Love outrebounds Davis 24 to 1.
posted at 1/4/2011 6:51 PM EST
- tomobo
- Posts: 616
- First: 5/11/2009
- Last: 4/29/2013
Considerind bb is seed of shaq is there any real surprise there? Fruit doesn't travel far from the tree unless its picked..
Re: Love outrebounds Davis 24 to 1.
posted at 1/4/2011 6:53 PM EST
- P34
- Posts: 3719
- First: 8/22/2010
- Last: 3/22/2011
Oh whats Love got to do, got to do with it
What's Love but a second hand emotion
What's Love got to do, got to do with it
Who needs a heart
When a heart can be broken
Re: Love outrebounds Davis 24 to 1.
posted at 1/4/2011 7:47 PM EST
- kyceltic
- Posts: 3018
- First: 2/12/2006
- Last: 5/19/2013
In Response to
Re: Love outrebounds Davis 24 to 1.:
Oh whats Love got to do, got to do with it What's Love but a second hand emotion What's Love got to do, got to do with it Who needs a heart When a heart can be broken
Posted by P34
Y Fierce, that's such a sweet old fashioned notion
Re: Love outrebounds Davis 24 to 1.
posted at 1/4/2011 8:42 PM EST
- BiasLewis
- Posts: 4262
- First: 5/30/2008
- Last: 6/30/2012
Some of you need to hit spell check before you send out a post. Butchering names of C's players isn't a good look when you're a fan of the team. You see the names practically everyday.
Re: Love outrebounds Davis 24 to 1.
posted at 1/4/2011 10:56 PM EST
In Response to
Re: Love outrebounds Davis 24 to 1.:
In Response to Re: Love outrebounds Davis 24 to 1. : Except Harangody got minutes against Love and he stunk up the joint. I saw him do a good job boxing out twice, but that's the extent of his effectiveness. The Celtics suffered their biggest deficit (10) after Davis went to the bench and Harangody replaced him and then came back and won the game when Davis came back and Harangody went to the bench.
Posted by cpjohn1
I disagree. He did a much better job on the boards.That was fairly obvious. The title of this thread is explanation enough. Baby is clearly much better offensively. Baby didnt exactly shoot the lights out though either. He hit some big free throws. Baby neds to work on his rebounding.
Re: Love outrebounds Davis 24 to 1.
posted at 1/5/2011 8:12 AM EST
- cpjohn1
- Posts: 3339
- First: 2/10/2005
- Last: 3/14/2013
In Response to
Re: Love outrebounds Davis 24 to 1.:
In Response to Re: Love outrebounds Davis 24 to 1. : I disagree. He did a much better job on the boards.That was fairly obvious. The title of this thread is explanation enough. Baby is clearly much better offensively. Baby didnt exactly shoot the lights out though either. He hit some big free throws. Baby neds to work on his rebounding.
Posted by existentialparquet
Much better job on the boards? Didn't he have 2 rebounds? I guess that's much better. lol
Re: Love outrebounds Davis 24 to 1.
posted at 1/5/2011 9:24 AM EST
- Karllost
- Posts: 5038
- First: 2/19/2009
- Last: 5/19/2013
In Response to
Re: Love outrebounds Davis 24 to 1.:
In Response to Re: Love outrebounds Davis 24 to 1. : that's great. so it's true. and arguably it's all symantics. you know, if i got too much coffee in me after a celts win and came on here pointed out how rondo and biedrins are fighting it out for the basement FT% in the league, following a lousy FT shooting game like rondo, i'd be assailed. a win is a win. davis got outrebounded by 23. i think that is horrible. i know he can do better and can't understand why for a guy who shows so much mobility doing other things on the floor, why can't he move his butt around better boxing people out? i dunno. but i chose to look at the whole team and the malaise that has enveloped others more so than it has davis the last few games that have been close squeakers. i thought it was more meaningful to point out the fact that 2/3 of the personnel on the team leave something to be desired of in their recent performance. and i'll tell you this, if we don't get something out of nate, marcheese and shak tonight, we are dead meat. davis has historically done well against duncan and we'll see how he does against blair. but i assert that our success in this game depends on rondo scoring some points, marcheese doing something, nate doing something other than a goose egg and shak being active on the glass, IN ADDITION to just davis being a sound rebounder. right?!
Posted by aciemvp
I agree with your post. I think you're getting too worked up about BBD and the criticism hes getting.
We came into this game and all the talk was about LOVE dominating the boards, even Doc discussed it.. it was a focal point. Well, if Love finished the game with 7 rebounds..guess what.. there'd be alot of posts of how great BBD did holding him down.
If Derek Rose scored 48 against Rondo, thered be alot of posts about Rondos suspect defense.
Many celtics are not playing well right now and Id attribute some of it to the new rotations and injuries. You get into a flow with teammates and then theyre gone. Start over.
You make good points but youre getting too upset with the criticism heaped on BBD. He deserved it for that one game because it was spotlighted and very noticable. It stuck out like a sore thumb.
Its over and done with now.. on to the Spurs.
Re: Love outrebounds Davis 24 to 1.
posted at 1/5/2011 1:16 PM EST
- aciemvp
- Posts: 3033
- First: 3/7/2008
- Last: 5/19/2013
In Response to
Re: Love outrebounds Davis 24 to 1.:
Some of you need to hit spell check before you send out a post. Butchering names of C's players isn't a good look when you're a fan of the team. You see the names practically everyday.
Posted by BiasLewis
marcheese is spelled with cheese because of his likeness "in ice" that he puts around his neck, = cheesey
Re: Love outrebounds Davis 24 to 1.
posted at 1/5/2011 1:28 PM EST
In Response to
Re: Love outrebounds Davis 24 to 1.:
In Response to Re: Love outrebounds Davis 24 to 1. : Much better job on the boards? Didn't he have 2 rebounds? I guess that's much better. lol
Posted by cpjohn1
He kept Love off of the boards. AND NO HE HAD 3! haha.
