In response to RallyC's comment:
In response to Fierce34's comment:
Was it really necessary to trade KG and Pierce for GW and Humpy?
Absorbing GW's contract means the Celtics will pay GW 20.2m, total, until 2016.
Would Ainge have done that trade if Brooklyn didn't offer 3 1st round picks?
If Ainge kept Pierce and KG for 1 more year then the Celts would still be a playoff team next season.
The Celts would also have gotten 27.3m in cap relief from Pierce's expiring contract and KG's non-guaranteed salary for next season.
That would have meant the Celtics would be able to go after a big name free-agent next summer.
I cannot believe how you think you know more about what's right for the Boston Celtics than does DA. Its like your Avatar! You live in fantasy and are playing "Fantsy GM" almost all of the time. You are hysterical in your analysys, Fierce, unless during the times when you are plagerizing other's writings on a subject. I am amazed at how much effort you put into trying to look like you know what you are talking about. We are all LOFAO@U all the time.
I don't know whether to call you a troll, scumdbag or idiot.
Fiece did not once say he knows better than Ainge. Dude, everyone on this site "plays" Ainge. If anything, you purport to know more than Ainge with your Rondo hating, as DA thinks Rondo is the Celtics franchise player and you would trade him just to get rid of him.